Thanks, Frank.
I was talking shots with flash and reflective surfaces the previous
evening, and had adjusted the exposure to -1.7. I didn't notice that
I had forgotten to reset the exposure compensation, so this and the
other early morning shots the next day were badly under exposed.
Adjusting
Very nice and sharp. On a side note have you ever noticed that
Photo.net details don't include any lens information, arguably more
important information about how a photo was made than the camera body?
On 10/1/2012 11:16 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Photo.net includes lens information if the photographer enters it.
On Oct 1, 2012, at 11:32 AM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Very nice and sharp. On a side note have you ever noticed that Photo.net
details don't include any lens information, arguably more important
Apparently it does the Camera body information automatically.
On 10/1/2012 11:47 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Photo.net includes lens information if the photographer enters it.
On Oct 1, 2012, at 11:32 AM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Very nice and sharp. On a side note have
Thanks for your comments, P.J.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:32 AM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Very nice and sharp. On a side note have you ever noticed that Photo.net
details don't include any lens information,
Thanks for looking, Paul.
You are right. I just noticed that I haven't been adding the lenses,
as I should. I have edited this one to show it was taken with my DA
18-135.
You may have noticed that I screwed up badly in taking this image, but
it came out fairly well, despite my wort efforts. G
Looks really hot on my android but it works. Love that deep blue background!
Cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Sent: October 1, 2012 10/1/12
To:
7 matches
Mail list logo