Thanks PJ.
I've gone back and looked for it again.
Using the crop box is the easiest way for me to check verticals.
The error is a couple of line widths, less than my eyes can tell.
With a big astigmatism since childhood, I'm pretty flexible on
straight lines. :-)
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Sep 6,
I think you imparted a subtle skew to the right, when you corrected the
lean. Not much, less than the width of the grid lines in Photoshop but
enough that I noticed it anyway.
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Thanks Marnie,
I tried straightening and stretching this one a bit.
I had actually pointed the ca
I hope not... Bob S.
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 8:33 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Is it me or does everything in the scene seem to skew slightly right...
>
> Bob Sullivan wrote:
>>
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9719320
>>
>> FA43 limited at f5.6 and 1/800th with ISO 200 on the K-7.
>>
>> Gr
Is it me or does everything in the scene seem to skew slightly right...
Bob Sullivan wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9719320
FA43 limited at f5.6 and 1/800th with ISO 200 on the K-7.
Great detail in the original, but less so as processed for the web.
The 43 limited is a fine len
Thanks Marnie,
I tried straightening and stretching this one a bit.
I had actually pointed the camera down a bit, to get less sky.
As a result, the buildings leaned a bit into the composition.
The tall John Hancock Building on the right is also a fooler.
It is not square, the sides slope inward.
Re
In a message dated 8/31/2009 3:42:15 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
rf.sulli...@gmail.com writes:
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9719320
>>
>> FA43 limited at f5.6 and 1/800th with ISO 200 on the K-7.
>>
>> Great detail in the original, but less so as processed for the web.
>> The 43
Paul, Dave, Jack, and Bob W.,
Thanks for commenting.
And Jack, even with the depressed RE market, it is expensive,
but it's 2 short blocks to school and a 20 minute walk to work.
Bob W., she's pretty excited about the whole thing. We are just
feeling our way.
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9719320
>
> FA43 limited at f5.6 and 1/800th with ISO 200 on the K-7.
>
> Great detail in the original, but less so as processed for the web.
> The 43 limited is a fine lens. More pictures later...
>
> This month, after 30 years, we are 'Empty Neste
Expensive looking view. Nice composition if just a little overall bluish.
Jack
--- On Mon, 8/31/09, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> From: Bob Sullivan
> Subject: PESO: Chicago View
> To: "PDML"
> Date: Monday, August 31, 2009, 11:53 AM
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9719320
>
> FA43 limited
Nice view, and lovely shot Bob. Very clean photo.
Erin and James are going to the church Thursday to set their wedding
date, and book the hall. Looks like I'll be in your boat next October,
except farther away from Chicago.:-0
Dave
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> http://ph
Nice view and an excellent composition.
I'd love to live in downtown Chicago, but still too many birds in my
nest.
Paul
On Aug 31, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9719320
FA43 limited at f5.6 and 1/800th with ISO 200 on the K-7.
Great detail in
11 matches
Mail list logo
