Hi!
HC> you would have to send the camera in, at least. it doesn't like there is an
HC> interface to connect to, so the camera needs to be partly disassembled. i
HC> would not be surprised to see a $100 charge for such an operation. for a
HC> camera that costs $300 and under, i don't see that anyo
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W"
Subject: Re: Question or better yet, idea
> Hi,
>
> > The new firmware fix gives you better than stop down metering. It
> > is a nice solution.
>
> I don't generally follow ist-d threads, so forgive me i
I think someone ought to hold their feet to the fire, so they come up
with a compatibility scheme to hook all my SMC K-mount lenses to my Optio-S4!
Now, there's an idea whose time has come!
Not that there's anything wrong with YOUR idea, Boris, but this one came
immediately to mind, so I had to br
And hacks are fine. Kludges are usually a mess.
Len
---
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
From: "Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Question or better yet, idea
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:43:57 -0500
I'd
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
From: alex wetmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Question or better yet, idea
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:04:29 -0800 (PST)
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Leonard Paris wrote:
> That's really strange, the
ry 09, 2004 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: Question or better yet, idea
> Hi,
>
> > The new firmware fix gives you better than stop down metering. It
> > is a nice solution.
>
> I don't generally follow ist-d threads, so forgive me if I'm repeating
> something, or if I&
Hi,
> The new firmware fix gives you better than stop down metering. It
> is a nice solution.
I don't generally follow ist-d threads, so forgive me if I'm repeating
something, or if I've missed something about the ist-d.
It sounds to me like a solution to a problem that shouldn't exist anyway.
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
> Do these have electronic DOF preview? Do they have a way to upgrade
> the firmware?
how about by exposing a roll of film to the binary code of the upgrade, then
loading that film into the camera?
arnie
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Leonard Paris wrote:
> That's really strange, the "crippled mount" idea. I was using my Zenitar
> fisheye in aperture priority with version 1.0 of the firmware and had no
> problems.
Probably in stop down metering?
That works great with screwmount lenses on a screwmount adapt
Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Pentax has proved by giving an example that a camera with crippled
>mount is not really so crippled. I wonder, whether they can produce an
>firmware upgrade for *ist, MZ-30 and similar cameras...
As long as you don't mind soldering a new surface-mount RO
That's really strange, the "crippled mount" idea. I was using my Zenitar
fisheye in aperture priority with version 1.0 of the firmware and had no
problems.
Len
---
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
From: Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Boris Liberman wrote:
> mount is not really so crippled. I wonder, whether they can produce an
> firmware upgrade for *ist, MZ-30 and similar cameras...
Do these have electronic DOF preview? Do they have a way to upgrade
the firmware?
I was talking to a friend about the chanc
I say that since the *ist is not a digital camera per se, there would be
no way to "upgrade" the firmware, without sending it back to Pentax to
have whatever ROM chip that holds the operating information, upgraded or
replaced.
Jeff.
-Original Message-
From: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL P
13 matches
Mail list logo
