I can't remember whether you had an E-3 or went straight from the E-1
to the
E-5. If you had an E-3, do you think the E-5 has major advantages
over it?
I was planning to buy an E-3 when the E-5 came out, to take advantage
of remainder pricing, etc. But the more I looked at it, the more
Yes. The digital backs for Hasselblad was made by a Danich company, that did
merge with Hasselblad (Sweden) a few years back. I guess the scanners came from
the very same company - which now is a part of the Hasselblad concern.
Jens
--
Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.
On
I occasionally get nostalgic and think I want to work with film again.
Then I shoot a roll of film, have it processed, and work through the
scanning business. After that, and after I look at the photos the
process creates, I put the film camera away until the next time I feel
nostalgic.
Going
I occasionally get nostalgic and think I want to work with film again.
Then I shoot a roll of film, have it processed, and work through the
scanning business. After that, and after I look at the photos the
process creates, I put the film camera away until the next time I feel
nostalgic.
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
I occasionally get nostalgic and think I want to work with film again.
Then I shoot a roll of film, have it processed, and work through the
scanning business. After that, and after I look at the photos the
process
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
I'll be going for a walk soon and will carry ... the Olympus E-5. ...
I can't remember whether you had an E-3 or went straight from the E-1 to the
E-5. If you had an E-3, do you think the E-5 has major advantages over it?
I was
2011/1/2 AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com:
I frequently miss shooting with the 645Nii, but never get around to
actually loading it with film.
Let me know when the dust gets too thick to manage ]=)
Ecke
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
He, he...
I meant to say 6x6 isn't the format for me. I want a rectangular viewfinder and
rectangular images - most of the time.
Regards
Jens
--
Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.
On Jan 3, 2011 12:21 eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote:
Jens wrote:
But more
Good point Godfrey.
To me is more an economical issue.
I own a large collection of Pentacon Six /Carl Zeiss Jena/Schneider Kreutznach
lenses.
I got this 10-15 years ago (ebay) after selling my Rolleiflex (man, was that
great), since I needed interchangeable lenses.
The Pentacon Six really does
Some great shots there, Mark.
I see you're still (?) using the MZ-S.
I got mine from a fellow PDML member. I do intend to keep it.
I recenly bought a K2. Great camera. Like a K1000 with an Auto Exposure option.
Still have one Spotmatic, a MX and a ME Super.
(Now I Just miss a Super A (one of the
They still make imacon scanners (I believe they were Danish actually)?
Jens
--
Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.
On Jan 1, 2011 20:32 paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jan 1, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Jens wrote:
I'm not sure Paul, but since it a studio recording
From: Jens
Thank you all for you rinterest in responding and answering my question.
I have done some samll tests, that didin't turn out too well. But I was
using old film and a questionable lab for developing.
My result is shown at flickr.
I photographed a sitting girl (in full figure) filling
2011/1/2 Jens p...@planfoto.dk:
They still make imacon scanners (I believe they were Danish actually)?
Jens
The Imacon scanners are now sold as Hasselblad Flextight scanners.
They're more expensive than a Pentax 645D by good margin.
I'm sure the Pentax 67 is a wonderful tool for acquiring
Try shooting the K7 through a pair of pantyhose.
That's not legal in Virginia. ;-)
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:58 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: Jens
Thank you all for you rinterest in responding and answering my question.
I have done some samll tests, that didin't turn
Sides, you'd have to take them off to do that..I'm guessing here, of course!
Jack
--- On Sun, 1/2/11, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml
Thank you all for you rinterest in responding and answering my question.
I have done some samll tests, that didin't turn out too well. But I was using
old film and a questionable lab for developing.
My result is shown at flickr.
I photographed a sitting girl (in full figure) filling out the frame
I'm not sure Paul, but since it a studio recording done at appr. the same time,
I guess it the same aperture - F 13 or perhaps F11.
Next time I shall:
1. Make sure the conditions are very close to being exactly the same.
2. Use new 120 film (Kodak Ektar 100 or Fuji Astia 100)
3. Use a pro-lab
17 matches
Mail list logo
