Re: RE: Slightly OT: Fuji 1600 Unscientific review

2002-11-22 Thread David Brooks
Thanks David.I'll keep that in mind.The Dressage team is showing at the same arena this Sunday.I was going to shoot some colour 800 or 1600 but i plan to take a roll of Neopan also. Dave Begin Original Message From: David Chang-Sang [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:23:52

Re: Re: Slightly OT: Fuji 1600 Unscientific review

2002-11-22 Thread David Brooks
Unfortunately the money we payed for the class buys the chemicals for all and the instructor likes and uses Tmax 1:4. Looks like i'l need to supply my own person with more than 1 developer in the house for use on different films. Is this what most of you do or do you stick with a favorite.?

Re: Re: Slightly OT: Fuji 1600 Unscientific review

2002-11-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
] Subject: Re: Re: Slightly OT: Fuji 1600 Unscientific review Unfortunately the money we payed for the class buys the chemicals for all and the instructor likes and uses Tmax 1:4. Looks like i'l need to supply my own person with more than 1 developer in the house for use on different films

RE: Re: Slightly OT: Fuji 1600 Unscientific review

2002-11-22 Thread tom
: Slightly OT: Fuji 1600 Unscientific review Unfortunately the money we payed for the class buys the chemicals for all and the instructor likes and uses Tmax 1:4. Looks like i'l need to supply my own person with more than 1 developer in the house for use on different films. Is this what most of you

Re: RE: RE: Slightly OT: Fuji 1600 Unscientific review

2002-11-21 Thread David Brooks
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:51:59 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: RE: Slightly OT: Fuji 1600 Unscientific review -Original Message- From: David Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] No,never had time to try other filters,and besides most