> I have 3 x 2GB Transcend 150x cards and they perform great. Yes it is
> true that the fit in the K10D slot is a bit snug but after a few times
> in and out of the slot they work just fine.
I have a Transcend 4GB SD and it's just fine. But the real problem with
these "second class" manufacturer
> >
> > For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
> What happens
> > here is, whenever someone somewhere in the world tweezes out an
> > eyebrow, Mike immediately grows another one to replace it.
> Otherwise a
> > vacuum would be created, which Nature abhors.
> >
> > Bob
> >
>
Bob W wrote:
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>>Eyebrow _tweezers_? (Shudder)
>>>
>>>=
>>>This is one of those female things (although some guys
>>
>>tweezer their
>>
>>>eyebrows). No worse than shaving (or not shaving).
>>>
>
>
> Nostril hairs!
>
>
>>>Eyebrow tweezers make han
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Those brows just need a moustach trimmer. Mine would be like that
> without a weekly trim.
> Paul
You're just encouraging them.
> On Jun 23, 2007, at 4:14 AM, mike wilson wrote:
>
>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In a message dated 6/22/2007 2:19:30 A.M. Pacific
I have 3 x 2GB Transcend 150x cards and they perform great. Yes it is
true that the fit in the K10D slot is a bit snug but after a few times
in and out of the slot they work just fine.
I did not need to sand down the label.
Rgds
Patrick
On 6/21/07, Mark Cassino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I k
In a message dated 6/23/2007 1:21:46 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, but.
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/photoessays/essays/london.html
(shudder again)
===
Aha! Got it.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
-
Warning: I am
Those brows just need a moustach trimmer. Mine would be like that
without a weekly trim.
Paul
On Jun 23, 2007, at 4:14 AM, mike wilson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> In a message dated 6/22/2007 2:19:30 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Eyebrow _tweezers_? (S
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Eyebrow _tweezers_? (Shudder)
> >
> > =
> > This is one of those female things (although some guys
> tweezer their
> > eyebrows). No worse than shaving (or not shaving).
> >
Nostril hairs!
> > Eyebrow tweezers make handy dandy little tools. T
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 6/22/2007 2:19:30 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Eyebrow _tweezers_? (Shudder)
>
> =
> This is one of those female things (although some guys tweezer their
> eyebrows). No worse than shaving (or not shavi
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 10:19:57AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 6/22/2007 2:19:30 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Eyebrow _tweezers_? (Shudder)
>
> =
> This is one of those female things (although some guys tweezer their
> eyebrow
In a message dated 6/22/2007 2:19:30 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eyebrow _tweezers_? (Shudder)
=
This is one of those female things (although some guys tweezer their
eyebrows). No worse than shaving (or not shaving).
Eyebrow tweezers make handy dandy
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 2007/06/21 Thu PM 04:51:47 GMT
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Transcend Memory Cards
>
> In a message dated 6/21/2007 3:29:49 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Give me back by CF cards!
> Paul
>
- Original Message -
From: "John Sessoms"
Subject: Re: Transcend Memory Cards
>> Ask anyone who worked/ works in retail/ photofinishing and they'll
>> tell you all about the horror that is the CF card interface.
> Would you care to elucidate? I'
Thanks for the report, Paul.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
2007/6/21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I returned both a Sandisk and a Transcend card under warranty. I had bought
> the Transcend from New Egg, and
>
> From:
> "William Robb"
>
> Ask anyone who worked/ works in retail/ photofinishing and they'll
> tell you all about the horror that is the CF card interface.
Would you care to elucidate? I'm running a photo-lab now and have
encountered no problems with CF cards.
The only problem I have encoun
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Give me back by CF cards!
Seconded. I've come to despise those teeny SD cards.
With any luck, the next top-end Pentax will take both types of card.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 6/21/2007 3:29:49 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Give me back by CF cards!
Paul
=
Yeah.
These SD things are just too tiny. I have to work hard to not lose them. And
they are hard to get out of the built-in reader (which has different slots
I have a small case with three 2G and one 4G CF cards in it. Nothing
I own now uses them, but no big deal to me. Something might in the
future, or I'll give them to my brother for use in his Nikon D200.
The K10D, *ist DS and L1 all use SD, so I have plenty and to spare in
SD capacity.
G
On
With the *ist-D I accumulated 4 -1GB cards, 2 - 2GB cards and 5 - 4GB
cards.
Be nice if I could have used them with the K-10D instead of having to
start all over again with a new type of card. And have to keep up with
two sets of cards since I still use the *ist-D for my backup.
Other than tha
I disagree. Neither card is any more fragile than the other. The
difference between them mechanically is that the SD card has a small
switch to hardware-write-lock them, something I wish CF cards had
too. The CF card, being larger and heavier, is more susceptible to
physical damage when dro
I returned both a Sandisk and a Transcend card under warranty. I had bought the
Transcend from New Egg, and they replaced it immediately. No problems. I had
purchased the Sandisk card from Adorama. Adorama said I had to return it to
Sandisk. Sandisk made me jump through hoops. I had to send the
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
Subject: Re: Transcend Memory Cards
> Why? I see no great advantage to CF over SD.
>
> I've had equipment that used both of these card types for a long
> time. I find the SD format easier to manage because the
The CF cards are sturdier overall. Yes, there can be pin alignment problems,
but the cards themselves are much less fragile.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Why? I see no great advantage to CF over SD.
>
> I've had equipmen
Why? I see no great advantage to CF over SD.
I've had equipment that used both of these card types for a long
time. I find the SD format easier to manage because they're smaller,
but there's nothing much in either direction to choose between them. d
Godfrey
On Jun 21, 2007, at 3:26 AM, Paul
Somehow I agree about your CF cards comment Paul ;)
As for SD cards, one point might be warranty differences? How is
Transcend warranty and how serious are they if there's a problem?
Also, I might remember badly but I remember ExtremeIII are quite a bit
faster than Transcend 150X.
--
Thibault M
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 06:26:41 -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote
> But Sandisk Ultra II are much slower than the Transcend 150X. You
> have to go to the Sandisk Extreme III to top or match the Transcend
> for speed. I use both Transcend and Sandisk now. I had a Transcend
> that simply failed right of
But Sandisk Ultra II are much slower than the Transcend 150X. You
have to go to the Sandisk Extreme III to top or match the Transcend
for speed. I use both Transcend and Sandisk now. I had a Transcend
that simply failed right off the shelf. But I had a Sandisk that
broke apart when the litt
On 21.06.2007, at 09:54 , John Whittingham wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:21:12 -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote
>> I have twelve of the 2G Transcend 150x cards.
>> Have not had one problem with them.
>>
>> At $21 each, they're proven to be quite a good deal.
>>
>> G
>
> I've four 2gb SD cards and t
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:21:12 -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote
> I have twelve of the 2G Transcend 150x cards.
> Have not had one problem with them.
>
> At $21 each, they're proven to be quite a good deal.
>
> G
I've four 2gb SD cards and two 2gb CF cards (for the *istD), never had a
problem with a
I have twelve of the 2G Transcend 150x cards.
Have not had one problem with them.
At $21 each, they're proven to be quite a good deal.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Mark Cassino wrote:
> Looking at the cards, the paper labels are visibly thicker than the
> older transcends I have. All it took was a few buffs with some 400 grade
> sandpaper and they were worn down enough to fit in and out of the camera
> without problem.
perhaps Transcend changed its' supp
I have about 5 of the Transcends and all are a little tight but can be
manipulated as John stated. I have also purchased a PQI 2 gb card
along with 2 Kingston 2 gb cards. All exhibit just a little tightness
in the K10D.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, June 20, 2007, 10:10:09 PM, you wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 09:46:38PM -0400, Mark Cassino wrote:
> I know that these cards have gotten somewhat mixed reviews (though the
> positive comments far outweigh the negatives.) Well, today I received
> two new 2 gig Transcend cards from NewEgg. I had pressed my slowest SD
> card card int
> I think I'm gonna join the "pay a little more" school of thought going
> forward...
>
> - MCC
Aren't your images worth it.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Cassino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Transcend Memory Cards
>I know that these cards have gotten somewhat m
Mark Cassino wrote:
> once the glossy finish on the label was gone, was I in
> for even more swelling of the paper in humid weather?
A little Goo Gone should get rid of that label permanently without
leaving behind gummy residue.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDM
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Cassino" Subject: Transcend Memory Cards
> I think I'm gonna join the "pay a little more" school of thought going
> forward...
I figure if my pictures are worth a Pentax, then they are also worth a
Sandisk.
Some would argue that my pictures are worth n
I thought that maybe you had.
Mark Cassino wrote:
> Mark Cassino wrote:
>
>> I had pressed my slowest SD
>> card card into service as a Jumpboost device on my laptop
>>
>
> Sorry - lost track of the jargon. That should read "readyboost device."
>
> Jumpboost devices have yet to be invent
Mark Cassino wrote:
>I had pressed my slowest SD
> card card into service as a Jumpboost device on my laptop
Sorry - lost track of the jargon. That should read "readyboost device."
Jumpboost devices have yet to be invented, but I bet they will be great
when they get here... :-)
- MCC
--
- -
38 matches
Mail list logo
