I have a roll of Tmax in my F90X at this very moment.
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
David J Brooks wrote:
I have a roll of Tmax in my F90X at this very moment.
How long has that roll of film been in the that camera? (To the
nearest 10 years)
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I haven't shot 35mm film in many years . Frankly 35mm film in the
digital age isn't worth the effort.
I do put a few rolls through the 6x7 every year though.
DS
On 10 March 2012 23:44, JC O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of
I'm teaching a photography class to middle schoolers this month. Last
week, we were talking about the anatomy of a camera... I pulled out a
K-1000 to demonstrate a few things, and asked: has anyone ever used a
film camera?
I got lots of blank looks, but then a hand went up, My Grandma has one!!
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:44 PM, JC O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?
I regularly shoot a random (black white/color) roll of film once
every
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
I have a roll of Tmax in my F90X at this very moment.
How long has that roll of film been in the that camera? (To the
nearest 10 years)
Since last Saturday, that's as close as i can get to
Den 12. mars 2012 kl. 22:44 skrev Derby Chang:
On 11/03/2012 7:08 AM, DagT wrote:
No, just medium format. But on the other hand I´m building a darkroom for
that use these days.
35mm is too small, digital is better. I just made a small museum for the
film stuff.
On 11/3/12, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
I hate to be a Linguistics Nazi, but Semantics is a part of Grammar, not
separate from it.
I hate to be a Nazi Nazi but you will be killed until you are dead dead dead.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
Just LF.
Only the occasional 35, and only rarely.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Agree.
My last 35mm roll was shot back in 2006. Right before digitak K100d.
But i shoot medium format 6x4.5 and 6x7 often. Mostly BW, but sometimes
also color negs and slides.
Gasha
On 03/10/2012 10:08 PM, DagT wrote:
No, just medium format. But on the other hand I´m building a darkroom for
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Cotty
I hate to be a Linguistics Nazi, but Semantics is a part of Grammar,
not separate from it.
I hate to be a Nazi Nazi
No you don't, you love it. You're Adolf Clarkson's far-right twin.
B
but you will be killed
On 11/03/2012 7:08 AM, DagT wrote:
No, just medium format. But on the other hand I´m building a darkroom for that
use these days.
35mm is too small, digital is better. I just made a small museum for the film
stuff.
http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m265/dagthrane/_DT20614-gammalt-utstyr.jpg
All of you Grammar Nazis, Semantic Nazis, and Linguistic Nazis are
going to give Nazis a bad name.
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
BTW, I hate to play the Grammar Nazi, but slide films and reversal
films aren't opposites, they
MAARR!
On 13/03/2012, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
All of you Grammar Nazis, Semantic Nazis, and Linguistic Nazis are
going to give Nazis a bad name.
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Bob W
Yep, I've basically gone back to film for family stuff, as my wife complains
that she
never gets to see any prints from digital - mainly because my work involves
being on the
computer all day, and so I seldom feel like spending time on it again
processing images.
In addition, I have a small
On 11 March 2012 15:30, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
I hate to be a Semantic Nazi, but you were being a Semantic Nazi, not
a Grammar Nazi.
I knew that, but as Semantic Nazi was unknown to me, and Grammar
Nazi was a cliche known to everyone, I decided to go with the popular
term at the
BTW, I hate to play the Grammar Nazi, but slide films and reversal
films aren't opposites, they are one and the same.
I hate to be a Semantic Nazi, but you were being a Semantic Nazi, not a
Grammar Nazi.
I hate to be a Linguistics Nazi, but Semantics is a part of Grammar, not
separate
On 11 March 2012 20:09, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
BTW, I hate to play the Grammar Nazi, but slide films and reversal
films aren't opposites, they are one and the same.
I hate to be a Semantic Nazi, but you were being a Semantic Nazi, not a
Grammar Nazi.
I hate to be a
On Mar 11, 2012, at 1:38 AM, Anthony Farr wrote:
Thanks, Bob, although I wish I'd seen your message a little earlier
than I did. Two feet in one mouth isn't a good look.
I think that would depend on the feet, and possibly what shoes she was wearing.
It's not *my* kink, but I try not to let
There should have been the word not before reversal, (bad editor, oh
wait a minute...).
On 3/10/2012 11:24 PM, Anthony Farr wrote:
On 11 March 2012 07:28, P. J. Allingwebstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry, by their ages past naming convention, Ektar should by rights be a
slide film.
On 3/11/2012 4:53 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Mar 11, 2012, at 1:38 AM, Anthony Farr wrote:
Thanks, Bob, although I wish I'd seen your message a little earlier
than I did. Two feet in one mouth isn't a good look.
I think that would depend on the feet, and possibly what shoes she was wearing.
On 11 March 2012 23:10, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
bleach I need more bleach...
Wishing to supply a link to a picture that would flesh out Larry's
proposition, I did a Google image search for feet in mouth. Hey,
it's a big world, there must be a picture to illustrate
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
BTW, I hate to play the Grammar Nazi, but slide films and reversal
films aren't opposites, they are one and the same.
I hate to be a Semantic Nazi, but you were being a Semantic Nazi, not a
Grammar Nazi.
I hate to be a
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 3:08 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
No, just medium format. But on the other hand I´m building a darkroom for
that use these days.
35mm is too small, digital is better. I just made a small museum for the film
stuff.
From: Robert and Leigh Woerner
Hi PDML Gang,
I haven't shot much film since getting a K20D in 2009 and then a K5 in December
2011.
The cost of film is horrendous, and, Kodak keeps cutting their own throats.
Kodachrome made them unique and bam, they discontinued it. I do like the Ektar
and had
John,
More than price, Kodachrome's problems at the film scanner caused it's downfall.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:01 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: Robert and Leigh Woerner
Hi PDML Gang,
I haven't shot much film since getting a K20D in 2009 and then a K5
On 3/10/12 16:44, JC O'Connell wrote:
I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?
Yes. Although it depends a bit on how you define regularly; I must
admit I don't seem shoot much in
From: Bob W
BTW, I hate to play the Grammar Nazi, but slide films and reversal
films aren't opposites, they are one and the same.
I hate to be a Semantic Nazi, but you were being a Semantic Nazi, not a
Grammar Nazi.
I hate to be a Linguistics Nazi, but Semantics is a part of Grammar, not
Bob Sullivan wrote:
John,
More than price, Kodachrome's problems at the film scanner caused it's
downfall.
I hated Kodachrome. Don't miss it at all.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Over 20 years ago, I once bought about 90 rolls of K64 marked down to
$0.10/roll.
Took me 10 years to shoot it all (freezer stored) . Loved that film and my
pro
Kodak carousel projector at the time. Wasn't scanning at the time or
it may have been much less fun.
-
J.C.O'Connell
On Mar 11, 2012, at 7:02 AM, Anthony Farr wrote:
On 11 March 2012 23:10, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
bleach I need more bleach...
Wishing to supply a link to a picture that would flesh out Larry's
proposition, I did a Google image search for feet in mouth. Hey,
Ofcause, I do.
But, I would buy a digital, high resolution camera if I could - Perhaps a
Pentax 645 or even better - a Phase One (costs about 50.000 USD here) if I
could. Untill then I shoot high resolution images with my Pentax 67/67II. It's
very good (when ever I can find a decent lab for
From: JC O'Connell
I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?
Not very often, but I dig a roll out once in a while if I'm feeling
particularly adventurous. I've got a refrigerator full
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:17 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Not very often, but I dig a roll out once in a while if I'm feeling
particularly adventurous. I've got a refrigerator full of it.
I hadn't shot any for a long time, sold off most of what I had in 35mm
stock. Then I
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:44 AM, JC O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?
With a bit of rounding up on the time, my numbers are identical to
Last roll of film I shot was October 2003. gs
George Sinos
gsi...@gmail.com
www.georgesphotos.net
plus.georgesinos.com
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:44 AM, JC O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
I have
George Sinos wrote:
Last roll of film I shot was October 2003. gs
Mid-2003 here.
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
FWIW, the one roll I did shoot and scan was TMAX100
and the sharpness was impressive but even this fine
grained BW 100 speed film showed grain noisier than iso
200 images from my *istDS.
---
jco
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Every couple of months I run some 120 BW, (respooled onto 620 spools)
through the Kodak Medalist II. The negatives are gorgeous, the subject
matter no so much. A friend gave me a few rolls of expired and soon to
be expired 35mm a couple of months ago. I loaded up a MX, a LX and the
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:44 AM, JC O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?
I don't shoot it regularly. Up until last year my ZX-L was a backup to
Dario Bonazza wrote:
George Sinos wrote:
Last roll of film I shot was October 2003. gs
Mid-2003 here.
The last 35mm film I shot was 2 rolls in 2005.
I still go through a few rolls of medium format slide film every year,
though.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
On 3/10/2012 2:46 PM, Adam Montoya wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:44 AM, JC O'Connellhifis...@gate.net wrote:
I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?
I don't shoot it regularly.
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:56 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/10/2012 2:46 PM, Adam Montoya wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:44 AM, JC O'Connellhifis...@gate.net wrote:
I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of film since buying it. I am
No, just medium format. But on the other hand I´m building a darkroom for that
use these days.
35mm is too small, digital is better. I just made a small museum for the film
stuff.
http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m265/dagthrane/_DT20614-gammalt-utstyr.jpg
DagT
Den 10. mars 2012 kl. 16:44
On 3/10/2012 3:02 PM, Adam Montoya wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:56 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/10/2012 2:46 PM, Adam Montoya wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:44 AM, JC O'Connellhifis...@gate.netwrote:
I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
Missed the original post...
I'm still shooting it from time to time, though I have resolved to stop
buying it. This afternoon I finished off a roll of Classic Pan 200 that
has been sitting in a holga for several months. These days it is mostly
120 film or the occasional 35mm BW roll. I bought
Quoting JC O'Connell hifis...@gate.net:
I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?
Not regularly. I have a few rolls of film still in the freezer
(nothing special - just basic 35 mm
Hi PDML Gang,
I haven't shot much film since getting a K20D in 2009 and then a K5 in December
2011.
The cost of film is horrendous, and, Kodak keeps cutting their own throats.
Kodachrome made them unique and bam, they discontinued it. I do like the Ektar
and had quite a fling with it in 2010
That is a fantastic image set! I especially like the sepia one.
- Original Message
From: Adam Montoya amont...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sat, March 10, 2012 3:02:04 PM
Subject: Re: Anybody still shooting film?
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:56 PM, P. J
On 11 March 2012 07:28, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry, by their ages past naming convention, Ektar should by rights be a
slide film. I didn't realize it was a reversal film.
Ekta wasn't a naming convention reserved just for transparency
film such as
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Anthony Farr farranth...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, I hate to play the Grammar Nazi, but slide films and reversal
films aren't opposites, they are one and the same.
I hate to be a Semantic Nazi, but you were being a Semantic Nazi, not
a Grammar Nazi.
--
PDML
On 3/10/2012 8:30 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Anthony Farrfarranth...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, I hate to play the Grammar Nazi, but slide films and reversal
films aren't opposites, they are one and the same.
I hate to be a Semantic Nazi, but you were being a
52 matches
Mail list logo
