> >
> > I can't remember whether you had an E-3 or went straight from the E-1
> to the
> > E-5. If you had an E-3, do you think the E-5 has major advantages
> over it?
>
> I was planning to buy an E-3 when the E-5 came out, to take advantage
> of remainder pricing, etc. But the more I looked at it
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Bob W wrote:
>> I'll be going for a walk soon and will carry ... the Olympus E-5. ...
>
> I can't remember whether you had an E-3 or went straight from the E-1 to the
> E-5. If you had an E-3, do you think the E-5 has major advantages over it?
I was planning to buy
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> I occasionally get nostalgic and think I want to work with film again.
> Then I shoot a roll of film, have it processed, and work through the
> scanning business. After that, and after I look at the photos the
> process creates, I put the
> I occasionally get nostalgic and think I want to work with film again.
> Then I shoot a roll of film, have it processed, and work through the
> scanning business. After that, and after I look at the photos the
> process creates, I put the film camera away until the next time I feel
> nostalgic.
>
I occasionally get nostalgic and think I want to work with film again.
Then I shoot a roll of film, have it processed, and work through the
scanning business. After that, and after I look at the photos the
process creates, I put the film camera away until the next time I feel
nostalgic.
Going thro
Yes. The digital backs for Hasselblad was made by a Danich company, that did
merge with Hasselblad (Sweden) a few years back. I guess the scanners came from
the very same company - which now is a part of the Hasselblad concern.
Jens
--
Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.
On
He, he...
I meant to say 6x6 isn't the format for me. I want a rectangular viewfinder and
rectangular images - most of the time.
Regards
Jens
--
Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.
On Jan 3, 2011 12:21 "eckinator" wrote:
> Jens wrote:
> >
> > But more important: 2. I just
2011/1/2 AlunFoto :
>
> I frequently miss shooting with the 645Nii, but never get around to
> actually loading it with film.
Let me know when the dust gets too thick to manage ]=)
Ecke
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE fr
Sides, you'd have to take them off to do that..I'm guessing here, of course!
Jack
--- On Sun, 1/2/11, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> From: Steven Desjardins
> Subject: Re: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date
"Try shooting the K7 through a pair of pantyhose."
That's not legal in Virginia. ;-)
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:58 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: "Jens"
>
>> Thank you all for you rinterest in responding and answering my question.
>> I have done some samll tests, that didin't turn out too well
2011/1/2 Jens :
> They still make imacon scanners (I believe they were Danish actually)?
> Jens
The Imacon scanners are now sold as "Hasselblad Flextight" scanners.
They're more expensive than a Pentax 645D by good margin.
I'm sure the Pentax 67 is a wonderful tool for acquiring images. I
freque
From: "Jens"
Thank you all for you rinterest in responding and answering my question.
I have done some samll tests, that didin't turn out too well. But I was
using old film and a questionable lab for developing.
My result is shown at flickr.
I photographed a sitting girl (in full figure) filling
They still make imacon scanners (I believe they were Danish actually)?
Jens
--
Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.
On Jan 1, 2011 20:32 "paul stenquist" wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Jens wrote:
> > I'm not sure Paul, but since it a studio recording done at appr. the
Some great shots there, Mark.
I see you're still (?) using the MZ-S.
I got mine from a fellow PDML member. I do intend to keep it.
I recenly bought a K2. Great camera. Like a K1000 with an Auto Exposure option.
Still have one Spotmatic, a MX and a ME Super.
(Now I Just miss a Super A (one of the
Good point Godfrey.
To me is more an economical issue.
I own a large collection of Pentacon Six /Carl Zeiss Jena/Schneider Kreutznach
lenses.
I got this 10-15 years ago (ebay) after selling my Rolleiflex (man, was that
great), since I needed interchangeable lenses.
The Pentacon Six really does
I'm not sure Paul, but since it a studio recording done at appr. the same time,
I guess it the same aperture - F 13 or perhaps F11.
Next time I shall:
1. Make sure the conditions are very close to being exactly the same.
2. Use new 120 film (Kodak Ektar 100 or Fuji Astia 100)
3. Use a pro-lab fo
Thank you all for you rinterest in responding and answering my question.
I have done some samll tests, that didin't turn out too well. But I was using
old film and a questionable lab for developing.
My result is shown at flickr.
I photographed a sitting girl (in full figure) filling out the frame
17 matches
Mail list logo
