C Actually I'm surprised nobody has ever actually assassinated a political
C figure using a video camera as the weapon. Hollowed out, it could provide
C plenty of cavity space for high explosives or projectile weaponry. Access
C is excellent, and they even stand the target in front of the thing
WR What will happen is that all politics will be done behind locked doors, with
WR the public excluded.
Isn't it that way already?
(just in case, the smiley omission is on purpose...)
Good light!
fra
On Oct 28, 2005, at 6:48 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I have the crosshair focusing screen for my MX...
I have the grid screen for my nuclear 6x7. That has 35 crosshairs...
there won't be much left when I let that baby off.
- Dave
David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 28, 2005, at 6:48 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I have the crosshair focusing screen for my MX...
I have the grid screen for my nuclear 6x7. That has 35 crosshairs...
there won't be much left when I let that baby off.
I bought the MX screen on an eBay
It has happend already. In the movies.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Cotty wrote:
On 27/10/05, Frantisek, discombobulated, unleashed:
Back like 30 or more years ago, in the Communist Czechoslovakian
republic, there
Wednesday, October 26, 2005, 5:52:27 AM, Bill wrote:
BDC Dave wrote:
Now if he needs 40 fps etc then he needs to upgrade to the Canons
or Nikons. I amd very satisfied with my istD as a steath camera.
People run when they see the 70-200VR with 1.7b tele.
BDC I just got my 300mm f4
On 27/10/05, Frantisek, discombobulated, unleashed:
Back like 30 or more years ago, in the Communist Czechoslovakian
republic, there was a big meeting of the Party brass with journalists
coming to it, including few foreign. And in walked a cameraman with
a Steadycam and began shooting (for those
On 10/27/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Classic.
Actually I'm surprised nobody has ever actually assassinated a political
figure using a video camera as the weapon. Hollowed out, it could provide
plenty of cavity space for high explosives or projectile weaponry. Access
is excellent, and
At 10:54 AM 10/27/2005, Cotty wrote:
Actually I'm surprised nobody has ever actually assassinated a political
figure using a video camera as the weapon. Hollowed out, it could provide
plenty of cavity space for high explosives or projectile weaponry. Access
is excellent, and they even stand the
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:54:21 +0100, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27/10/05, Frantisek, discombobulated, unleashed:
Back like 30 or more years ago, in the Communist Czechoslovakian
republic, there was a big meeting of the Party brass with journalists
coming to it, including few foreign.
Pentax made such a camera ... it was called the Stinger
http://www.aohc.it/oddse1.htm
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Glen
I have seen pictures on the internet of gun-cameras that supposedly were
designed for use by the CIA. I can't remember what brand of camera they
used, but I think
I wonder if they put a crosshair on the focusing screen.
Pentax made such a camera ... it was called the Stinger
http://www.aohc.it/oddse1.htm
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Glen
I have seen pictures on the internet of gun-cameras that supposedly were
designed for use by
A couple of Al Qaeda/Taliban operatives assassinated Ahmad Shah Massoud.
the then leader of the Northern Alliance, on Sept 9, 2001, they were
disguised as television journalists, according to eye witnesses their
camera had the weapon inside it.
Cotty wrote:
On 27/10/05, Frantisek,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax made such a camera ... it was called the Stinger
http://www.aohc.it/oddse1.htm
I wonder if they put a crosshair on the focusing screen.
I have the crosshair focusing screen for my MX...
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
I don't think that much accuracy was possible, or required...
(Nor do I think I'd want that thing anywhere near my face when it went off).
Mark Roberts wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax made such a camera ... it was called the Stinger
http://www.aohc.it/oddse1.htm
I wonder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if they put a crosshair on the focusing screen.
smile
Meant only for close up work, Tom...
keith
Pentax made such a camera ... it was called the Stinger
http://www.aohc.it/oddse1.htm
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Glen
I have seen pictures on
Oh, I guess it's only good for snapshots. I suppose you can't expect much from
ISO 1800 ft/sec anyway. I bet the results probably give new meaning to the term
barrel distortion.
Meant only for close up work, Tom...
I wonder if they put a crosshair on the focusing screen.
Pentax made
- Original Message -
From: Glen
Subject: Re: Sent the Dark Side to My Brother
I suppose a Nikon hitting Bush's head could
potentially do some damage. ;)
To what?
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Sent the Dark Side to My Brother
Actually I'm surprised nobody has ever actually assassinated a political
figure using a video camera as the weapon. Hollowed out, it could provide
plenty of cavity space for high explosives or projectile
To the camera
Shel
[Original Message]
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 10/27/2005 12:41:02 PM
Subject: Re: Sent the Dark Side to My Brother
- Original Message -
From: Glen
Subject: Re: Sent the Dark Side to My Brother
I suppose
John Forbes wrote:
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:54:21 +0100, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27/10/05, Frantisek, discombobulated, unleashed:
Back like 30 or more years ago, in the Communist Czechoslovakian
republic, there was a big meeting of the Party brass with journalists
coming to it,
Cotty escribió:
Actually I'm surprised nobody has ever actually assassinated a political
figure using a video camera as the weapon. Hollowed out, it could provide
plenty of cavity space for high explosives or projectile weaponry. Access
is excellent, and they even stand the target in front of
On 27/10/05, Carlos Royo, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, Ahmad Shah Massoud, a legendary Afghan warlord and defence
minister of the Northern Alliance, was killed the way you suggest in
September 2001 (some days before the 9-11 attacks), by a fake TV crew,
using a modified video camera
: Thursday, October 27, 2005 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: Sent the Dark Side to My Brother
A couple of Al Qaeda/Taliban operatives assassinated Ahmad Shah Massoud.
the then leader of the Northern Alliance, on Sept 9, 2001, they were
disguised as television journalists, according to eye witnesses
Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
Dave wrote:
Now if he needs 40 fps etc then he needs to upgrade to the Canons
or Nikons. I amd very satisfied with my istD as a steath camera.
People run when they see the 70-200VR with 1.7b tele.
I just got my 300mm f4 for my 6x7 and I suspect
Dave wrote:
Now if he needs 40 fps etc then he needs to upgrade to the Canons
or Nikons. I amd very satisfied with my istD as a steath camera.
People run when they see the 70-200VR with 1.7b tele.
I just got my 300mm f4 for my 6x7 and I
With whom are you debating?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Still debating if i should pick up a 300 for my 6x7.:-)
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sent the Dark Side to My Brother
Still debating if i should pick up a 300 for my 6x7.:-)
Your a big guy. You can do it.
William Robb
Do you have a gym membership? I think I'll have to join.
Brother D
Just consider the 300 as training for the 600!
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sent the Dark Side to My Brother
Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
Dave wrote:
Now if he
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Still debating if i should pick up a 300 for my 6x7.:-)
Your a big guy. You can do it.
Well with a lens that big it's not so much as being able to pick it up
as being able to, erm... keep it up.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sent the Dark Side to My Brother
Still debating if i should pick up a 300 for my 6x7.:-)
Your a big guy. You can do it.
William Robb
Well, thats stil true
-
From: Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sent the Dark Side to My Brother
Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
Dave wrote:
Now if he needs 40 fps etc then he needs to upgrade to the Canons
or Nikons. I amd very satisfied with my istD as a steath camera.
People run when they see the 70
On Oct 26, 2005, at 11:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still debating if i should pick up a 300 for my 6x7.:-)
Brother Dave
You should. I have the old Takumar one and it's pretty good. Or are
you thinking more along the lines of the new ED version?
- Other Brother Dave
Dave wrote:
Now if he needs 40 fps etc then he needs to upgrade to the Canons
or Nikons. I amd very satisfied with my istD as a steath camera.
People run when they see the 70-200VR with 1.7b tele.
I just got my 300mm f4 for my 6x7 and I suspect folks will
scatter when that
34 matches
Mail list logo
