Still more on Vivian Maier

2011-01-09 Thread Eric Weir
On Jan 9, 2011, at 4:27 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 1/6/2011 5:24:25 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, bran.everseek...@sasktel.net writes: http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2011/01/cam era-of-the-year-2010.html The above led me to this at the

RE: Still more on Vivian Maier

2011-01-09 Thread Bob W
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2011/0 1/cam era-of-the-year-2010.html The above led me to this at the same site. http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/blog_i ndex.html There is some discussion about what her status should be in

Re: Still more on Vivian Maier

2011-01-09 Thread Steven Desjardins
People can always come up with esoteric reasons why things can't be true even when the contrary is obvious. Maier can be a great photographer simply based on her own work, influence be damned. But even that makes little sense. She can now influence the way we see Chicago during her time and her

Re: Still more on Vivian Maier

2011-01-09 Thread Darren Addy
Keep in mind that the works on the blog have apparently been selected BY MALOOF, who was not even into photography before his discovery. Now either he is a natural curator with an excellent eye, or he has relied on some help, or her work is just empiracally and obviously excellent. What we have