On Jan 9, 2011, at 4:27 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 1/6/2011 5:24:25 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
bran.everseek...@sasktel.net writes:
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2011/01/cam
era-of-the-year-2010.html
The above led me to this at the
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2011/0
1/cam
era-of-the-year-2010.html
The above led me to this at the same site.
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/blog_i
ndex.html
There is some discussion about what her status should be in
People can always come up with esoteric reasons why things can't be
true even when the contrary is obvious. Maier can be a great
photographer simply based on her own work, influence be damned. But
even that makes little sense. She can now influence the way we see
Chicago during her time and her
Keep in mind that the works on the blog have apparently been selected
BY MALOOF, who was not even into photography before his discovery. Now
either he is a natural curator with an excellent eye, or he has
relied on some help, or her work is just empiracally and obviously
excellent. What we have
4 matches
Mail list logo