Levente -Levi- Littvay wrote:
So the MZ-S and the Z/SF series are my options. (and the *ist which has
not been tested by any of us... so I'll wait... :))
In my experience, manual focusing in the MZ-S would be the best of the
lot, in spite of the relative low magnification finder, the
On 7 Mar 2003, Levente -Levi- Littvay wrote:
The *ist has the best (most sophisticated) autofocus and the prism is
some new bright one which sould be very cool. Also it can shoot more
pics per sec. (2.7)
I thought the *ist used a pentamirror system, and had a really atrotcious
viewfinder, at
Just figured I'll sum up what I learned. Please let me know if I am
still mistaken somewhere...
MZ-30 and MZ-60 (ZX if you pref) will not work with my manual aperture
lenses. - these are out of the Q.
The MZ-3 and MZ-5n has the best feel for someone who is used to the dial
on the MX, K-1000,
Levente -Levi- Littvay wrote:
The *ist has the best (most sophisticated) autofocus and the prism is
some new bright one which sould be very cool. Also it can shoot more
pics per sec. (2.7)
I thought only the *ist D had a prism, the *ist was a mirror?
The MZ-3 and MZ-5n has the best feel for someone who is used to the dial
on the MX, K-1000, LX... etc. It also has a more sophisticated
pentaprism viewfinder and simple basic functions.
I do not know what sophisticated exactly mean here, but the viewfinders of
the entire MZ/ZX series aren't
Alan
Thanks very much for the help... (It is awsome to be on a list with so
helpful people...)
What is the spot metering? How will it affect it?
The split image does interfere the accuracy of spot meter. I have found no
way to compensate because it seems to be situation dependent.
What is the dif between spot metering and center weight?
Spot meter measures only the very centre (about 5%?) of the picture area
while centre-weighted measures the whole picture area with emphasis toward
the centre. Every manufacturer and camera model has slightly different
pattern so you have
7 matches
Mail list logo
