I have an opportunity to get the Tak 35/2.3 so was wondering what would be a
fair price for it, also for the 85/1.8 (it is Auto unfortunately so may not
buy it if it ain't so good).
I'll probably buy the Tak 35/2 down the road, I love messing about with the
35's as they are close to normal on my
, 2004 2:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Takumar 35/2.3 and 85/1.8
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Takumar 35/2.3 and 85/1.8
that wasn't me, I restore them, not destroy them.
I would smash some lenses though given the opportunity
even
I was hoping that somebody may be able to educate me. I am hoping to grow my
collection of M42 mount lenses and am particularly interested in the two
lenses noted above. The 35/2.3 seems to be extremely rare so finding
information is virtually impossible. I was also hoping to ask for more
PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 2:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Takumar 35/2.3 and 85/1.8
I was hoping that somebody may be able to educate me. I am hoping to
grow my collection of M42 mount lenses and am particularly interested in
the two lenses noted above. The 35/2.3 seems
There are two screwmount 85/1.8 lenses. The early one was an Auto Takumar (I
think that's the designation) lens that required manual stopdown and was not
very well considered. The second came late in the screwmount era. It's called
the Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 85/1.8, and it's a great lens.
recommend the
35mm F3.5 SMCT, the 35mm F2 ST (67mm threaded version), or the SMCT 35mm
F2
instead.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Gateway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 2:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Takumar 35/2.3 and 85/1.8
I was hoping
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Takumar 35/2.3 and 85/1.8
With the SMCT 35/2, you have to watch out for the dreaded yellow
peril. The glass is frequently yellowed due to the use of
radioactive materials.
JCO, didn't you come up with a cure for that which
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the SMCT 35/2, you have to watch out for the dreaded yellow
peril. The glass is frequently yellowed due to the use of
radioactive materials.
JCO, didn't you come up with a cure for that which didn't involve
impacting the
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Takumar 35/2.3 and 85/1.8
With the SMCT 35/2, you have to watch out for the dreaded yellow peril.
The glass is frequently yellowed due to the use of radioactive
materials. Paul
while the smct 85mm F1.8 is a truly great lens, avoid the Auto Tak
85mm F1.8
/2.3 and 85/1.8
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Takumar 35/2.3 and 85/1.8
With the SMCT 35/2, you have to watch out for the dreaded yellow
peril. The glass is frequently yellowed due to the use of
radioactive materials.
JCO, didn't you come up
20D.
What kind of outrageous sums of money should I expect to be relieved of for
these two lenses?
Gareth
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 3:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Takumar 35/2.3 and 85/1.8
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Takumar 35/2.3 and 85/1.8
that wasn't me, I restore them, not destroy them.
I would smash some lenses though given the opportunity
even if they werent yellowed!
You might want to go back and reread my question,.
a bit more
]
Subject: Re: Takumar 35/2.3 and 85/1.8
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Takumar 35/2.3 and 85/1.8
that wasn't me, I restore them, not destroy them.
I would smash some lenses though given the opportunity
even if they werent yellowed!
You might want to go back
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Takumar 35/2.3 and 85/1.8
OK,
I thought you meant I was the smasher!
I know better than that.
William Robb
14 matches
Mail list logo
