John,
Taking a guess here, it sounds like you may have a Tamron Adaptall
lens with the m42 adaptall mount attached. (You could get a KM
adaptall mount to replace the m42 adaptall mount and save yourself the
need of an m42 to K adapter.
If it is an Adaptall lens, it is probably either a 22A or a 40
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 04:29:53PM -0500, John wrote:
> I have been considering the purchase of a 25-35mm to something lens.
> In the decision process I went into my drawer of previous lenses too
> precious to sell. (translation: Once in the drawer, they get lost in
> the memory ) Out came a Tamro
Maybe the difference between 1:7 and 1:4 is not that much? It should
probably give you the closest focus at the wide end in macro mode if
it allows that. Some lenses will only lock into macro at a particular
focal length.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:29 PM, John wrote:
> I have been considering the
I have been considering the purchase of a 25-35mm to something lens. In
the decision process I went into my drawer of previous lenses too
precious to sell. (translation: Once in the drawer, they get lost in the
memory ) Out came a Tamron screw mount short (35-135 f 3.5) Macro Zoom.
I don't r
Tim Bray escribió:
> Just a little piece of evidence that you can get lovely results with
> them Tamron telephotos. This is with a 70-210 that's at least ten
> years old, on a *ist-D:
> http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2005/05/07/-big/IMGP1854.jpg
> -T
>
The Tamron lenses I've had or used
On Feb 5, 2008 2:51 PM, Frits Wüthrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SP 70-200/2.8 Di LD (IF) Macro
>
> I saw this lens mentioned on the B&H website. Any idea about price? It offers
> a stop more then the upcoming 60-250 Pentax lens, so this might be an
> interesting lens.
Just a little piece of ev
I had this Sigma with HSM in Nikon mount. It wasn't as fast as
Dario's 70-200/2.8 in K mount screwdriven by *istD. If Dario reads it
he may confirm this. AFAIR it was about as fast as DA* 50-135 despite
ring USM motor, so nothing special. Contrary to this Canon L
70-200/2.8 IS was much fast
Adam Maas escribió:
> I've heard $699 as the likely price. There's also a Sigma 70-200 f2.8
> HSM that's likely to be the fastest focusing lens available for Pentax
> when it's released shortly (It gets a real ring-type USM motor, which
> are typically much faster than the micro-motor USM setup Pen
And those Sigma HSM are incompatible with pre-K100DSuper/K10D AF-wise.
Oh, also to note that since a couple of those Sigma are 35mm lenses,
they will cover 'FF' format but... will not be able to AF with ANY
camera but K100Ds/K10D/K20D/K200D anfd later.
You probably know this but I wanna be sure e
Pentax have suggested that some future DA* lenses might not be
dual-drive. That leaves the door open for them to switch to
ring motors for at least some lenses.
My bet is that it won't happen for a couple of years, though.
And when it does happen, people will be able to whine about
missing AF ca
I've heard $699 as the likely price. There's also a Sigma 70-200 f2.8
HSM that's likely to be the fastest focusing lens available for Pentax
when it's released shortly (It gets a real ring-type USM motor, which
are typically much faster than the micro-motor USM setup Pentax is
using on the DA*'s to
Silly to ask, I suppose, but if it was mentioned on the B&H website, I
would have thought it would have been priced.(?)
Jack
--- Frits Wüthrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SP 70-200/2.8 Di LD (IF) Macro
>
> I saw this lens mentioned on the B&H website. Any idea about price?
> It offers
> a sto
Yes, I am interested as well. Will just have to wait and see what come
available first and how much.
I have mixed emotions on the Sigma products. I own their P-TTL flash
for the Pentax and it is not up to snuff but does work. I have had
three of their lenses over the years and have not been happy w
SP 70-200/2.8 Di LD (IF) Macro
I saw this lens mentioned on the B&H website. Any idea about price? It offers
a stop more then the upcoming 60-250 Pentax lens, so this might be an
interesting lens.
--
Frits Wüthrich
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinf
Asahi Opt - Takumar Hood
49mm threads, marked as used on Takumar 105mm 2.8 & 100mm 4.0
Has signs of usage - a few superficial scratches - otherwise in very good
condition. Make offer.
Tamron Items:
+ 35-80mm f2.8-3.8, manual focus, high speed CF Macro compact zoom, BBAR
Multiple Layer Coating, Ad
Frits Wüthrich wrote:
> On Friday 09 February 2007 20:18, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>> On Feb 9, 2007, at 7:03 AM, Micah B. Kleit wrote:
>>> Doing my usual morning browsing through B&H, I found a tamron lens
>>> coming soon; don't know if this has come up before:
On Friday 09 February 2007 20:18, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2007, at 7:03 AM, Micah B. Kleit wrote:
> > Doing my usual morning browsing through B&H, I found a tamron lens
> > coming soon; don't know if this has come up before:
> >
> > http://www.
On Feb 9, 2007, at 7:03 AM, Micah B. Kleit wrote:
> Doing my usual morning browsing through B&H, I found a tamron lens
> coming soon; don't know if this has come up before:
>
> http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?
> O=Search&A=details&Q=&sku=
Most likely.
Micah B. Kleit wrote:
> Doing my usual morning browsing through B&H, I found a tamron lens
> coming soon; don't know if this has come up before:
>
> http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?
> O=Search&A=details&Q=&sku=363813&is=REG&
Doing my usual morning browsing through B&H, I found a tamron lens
coming soon; don't know if this has come up before:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?
O=Search&A=details&Q=&sku=363813&is=REG&addedTroughType=search
There's a "MF-AF&qu
--- Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just purchased a second *istD and it came with an
> in the box Tamron AF 28-200mm F3.8-5.6 LD Aspherical
> (if)
> Is it worth keeping or worth eBaying it?
> Any reports greatfully recieved
>
> Kind regards
> Kevin
I owned a Tamron 28-200. Bought
Kevin,
I've used 2 of the Tamron 28-200mm. The first was labeled 171D (if I
remember right), I bought it off ebay for around $50, and the second is
a 571D, bought from KEH for about $60. I got rid of the first when the
outer element got some play in it and it turned into a soft focus lens.
T
I just purchased a second *istD and it came with an
in the box Tamron AF 28-200mm F3.8-5.6 LD Aspherical (if)
Is it worth keeping or worth eBaying it?
-
Kevin, I have not used this. Probably some list members have. I believe,
though, that Tamron has brought out different models of this, with n
I just purchased a second *istD and it came with an
in the box Tamron AF 28-200mm F3.8-5.6 LD Aspherical (if)
Is it worth keeping or worth eBaying it?
Any reports greatfully recieved
Kind regards
Kevin
--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-a
Hi,
I bought this zoom without the lens hood, it's Lens # 19AH, dunno
what's the # of the hood, but it has outer bayonet (meaning it
bayonets to the inside of the lens outer barrel). The hood would
really help - anyone has for sale?
Thanks
Good light,
Frantisek Vlcek
-
This messa
Hello.
Someone (whose enquiry was "mislaid") asked about a replacement cap for a
Tamron 300mm F2.8. It turned up on our delivery from Japan. So, whoever you
are, we have it for you.
Kind regards
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.
ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1237851344
> http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1241636108
>
> Todd
>
> At 07:57 PM 6/4/01 +0100, you wrote:
> >A colleague of my wants to sell some of his equipment. I'll take his ME
> >Super w
API.dll?ViewItem&item=1241636108
Todd
At 07:57 PM 6/4/01 +0100, you wrote:
>A colleague of my wants to sell some of his equipment. I'll take his ME
>Super with a 50mm/f1.7, but there is also a Tamron lens in the kit. I want
>to offer him to sell it for him on eBay, but I have no
A colleague of my wants to sell some of his equipment. I'll take his ME
Super with a 50mm/f1.7, but there is also a Tamron lens in the kit. I want
to offer him to sell it for him on eBay, but I have no idea about the value
of this lens, can someone advise please?
TAMRON
CF TELE MACRO
BBAR M
At 12:04 PM 3/17/2001 -0600, Gary wrote:
>Has anyone used the Tamron 28-105 f4-5.6 AF lens? If so, can you
give me
>some info regarging it's sharpness, bokeh, contrast, and build
quality?
Sharpness: Surprisingly good. Some fall-off at 105mm wide
open
Bokey?? Dont know. Too subjective.
Contras
30 matches
Mail list logo
