I have not seen any new PDML digests since Saturday 23 April.
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1209 / Virus Database: 1500/3596 - Release Date: 04/25/11
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
Don't know about the digest(s) but the list has seemed wonky for the last few
days with several persons reporting difficulty sending and/or receiving
messages. Do Digests get generated based on Time (i.e., every so often) or on
Volume (i.e., every x messages)? There may not have been enough
Seeing it again. The digest has lots of responses to posts that the
original did not appear in a previous digest. Doesn't look like there
are any gaps in the digests.
I don't see gaps in the digests. Vol 145 follows Vol 144 ...
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG
From: Doug Brewer
On 1/17/2010 3:32 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
I don't think everything is getting into the digests.
I keep seeing responses to posts I never saw.
I'll run through some back issues and see what I can see.
Thanks. I realize it could be a problem on my end.
--
PDML Pentax
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:00 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Thanks. I realize it could be a problem on my end.
There are many creams, salves and ointments that could help you. As a
last resort, there's always surgery...
HTH,
frank
;-)
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.
I don't think everything is getting into the digests.
I keep seeing responses to posts I never saw.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 1/17/2010 3:32 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
I don't think everything is getting into the digests.
I keep seeing responses to posts I never saw.
I'll run through some back issues and see what I can see.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
I subscribe through the digests. I've recently noticed responses to
posts that I never saw the original in the digest.
I don't know if that represents gaps in my memory or if they're really
missing from the digests.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
Me too!
Jack
--- On Thu, 12/17/09, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
Subject: PDML Digests
To: pdml@pdml.net
Date: Thursday, December 17, 2009, 12:34 PM
I subscribe through the digests. I've
recently noticed responses to posts that I never
://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2688014
Dan M
On 9/10/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I offer this about every year, but especially this year as it is
the fifth anniversary. I have 9 PDML Digests from September the 11th and
12th, 2001. If you would like me to forward them, please
I think I offer this about every year, but especially this year as it is
the fifth anniversary. I have 9 PDML Digests from September the 11th and
12th, 2001. If you would like me to forward them, please contact me off list.
Meanwhile, my thoughts turn towards the solemn events of that day five
. Witness the bombings in London and Madrid.
Regards, Bob S.
On 9/10/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I offer this about every year, but especially this year as it is
the fifth anniversary. I have 9 PDML Digests from September the 11th and
12th, 2001. If you would like me to forward
I was contacted off list by a lurker who notes:
Never has happened before, but my up-to-date Norton Anti-Virus proggie
kicked out both numbers 2970 and 2973 of the PDML
saying that a virus was found in each. 2971 and 2970 were accepted
properly as were all PDML's before these two numbers.
I didn't receive 2970, 2971 and 2973. I wonder if they were deleted by the
server for viruses?
I was contacted off list by a lurker who notes:
Never has happened before, but my up-to-date Norton Anti-Virus proggie
kicked out both numbers 2970 and 2973 of the PDML
saying that a virus was
I'm not in digest, but I received lots of spam with
suspicious attachs in the last hours...
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was contacted off list by a lurker who notes:
Never has happened before, but my up-to-date
Norton Anti-Virus proggie
kicked out both numbers 2970 and 2973 of
Cotty wrote:
I was contacted off list by a lurker who notes:
Never has happened before, but my up-to-date Norton Anti-Virus proggie
kicked out both numbers 2970 and 2973 of the PDML
saying that a virus was found in each. 2971 and 2970 were accepted
properly as were all PDML's before these
-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 2:56 PM
Subject: PDML Digests -notice any virus activity?
I was contacted off list by a lurker who notes:
Never has happened before, but my up-to-date Norton Anti-Virus
proggie
kicked out both numbers 2970 and 2973 of the PDML
saying that a virus
Why the heck are you reading the digest, Cotty?
--GENERAL COMMENTS--
I have been remakably clean ever sence my last upgrade to XP Pro SP2
with the firewall set. Of course I am also running AVG, AND AdsGone.
Also I periotically run Ad-Aware, Spyware, Xoftspy, and RegCleaner (old
version that
I'm a Mac user. I just run my computer and operating system. Never had
a problem.
Paul
On Nov 24, 2005, at 2:33 PM, graywolf wrote:
Why the heck are you reading the digest, Cotty?
--GENERAL COMMENTS--
I have been remakably clean ever sence my last upgrade to XP Pro SP2
with the firewall
.-)
The same here.
Also, I never leave an email address any place where it is
searchable. This works better than any program and I only get
something like one spam a week, and that is from this email address.
Try to search for you email address with Google, and if you find it
you ask
Every other digest I've gotten today (and I've gotten a flood of them today)
has been tagged with the message below, and the contents have been deleted.
I'm running McAfee VirusScan v8.0.46, DAT version 4.0.4635 dated 11/23/05,
under Windows XP Home SP2 and Outlook 2000.
I 'spect one of y'all on
On 24/11/05, graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
Why the heck are you reading the digest, Cotty?
I'm not, Tom. Here's my original message:
I was contacted off list by a lurker who notes:
Never has happened before, but my up-to-date Norton
On 24 Nov 2005 at 14:41, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I'm a Mac user. I just run my computer and operating system. Never had
a problem.
I'm just W2K user, same computer and OS, no nasty resource hogging AV tools
running. It all boils down to keeping OS and applications fresh with current
updates,
On 25/11/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
and how tight your firewalls are.
I'm up three octaves but the ointment is working.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 24 Nov 2005 at 22:11, Cotty wrote:
On 25/11/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
and how tight your firewalls are.
I'm up three octaves but the ointment is working.
good for you, I'm glad it's doing the trick ;-P
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: PDML Digests -notice any virus activity?
On 24 Nov 2005 at 14:41, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I'm a Mac user. I just run my computer and operating system. Never had
a problem.
I'm just W2K user, same computer and OS, no nasty
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: PDML Digests -notice any virus activity?
I was contacted off list by a lurker who notes:
Never has happened before, but my up-to-date Norton Anti-Virus proggie
kicked out both numbers 2970 and 2973 of the PDML
saying that a virus was found
Now that's just so much more information than I needed.
Cotty wrote:
On 25/11/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
and how tight your firewalls are.
I'm up three octaves but the ointment is working.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
Hello,
i've gotten all digests since 2970, no duplicates.
25 from 48 digests since 2970 are 78kb in size
and seem to contain some virus. I don't think the
address is spoofed, because there are no duplicated
or missing digest numbers.
Martin Albrecht
Here is the header from 2970:
Return-Path
Is there anywhere where I can view and/or search the archived or digest
version of this list? Please email me privately at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
Pat Wunsch
At 02:29 AM 1/12/04, throwing caution to the wind, Cotty wrote:
Just a quick note that is probably already known about but I mention it
here because there's no way I can know if it's known about (a sort of
known unknown)
Haven't received any digests for at least 10 hours now, which is highly
Just seeing if I can post.
I can receive individual posts but not digests
W.
Cotty,
Not sure if the previous my message go through (I had a server problem), but thanks
for the offer; I would love to have
it.
Best,
Mishka
A scroll of mail from Paris, Leonard [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu,
6 Sep 2001 13:43:26 -0500
Read it? y
There is a way to set up Outlook to only send in plain text, regardless. On
the screen where you can see all of your message subject lines, pull down
the Tools menu, select options, and then
I'm a digest subscriber and have been missing digests since last Friday
(missing 1234, 1235, 1239, 1244, 1245, 1246, 1249, 1252, 1253).
Anyone else experiencing this? Can it be fixed?
Thanks and Regards
Jim Brooks
E-MAILS
Well, it was the other way around, I was entitled a refund, so that limited
my negotiation options.
Frits Wüthrich
Frits J. Wüthrich wrote:
I had
to fight several times with the Dutch tax authorities about my umlaut.
Did you politely decline to pay any income tax that wasn't personally
Doug Brewer wrote:
Now that MIME has been dealt a death blow...
Hi Doug,
You da Man!! This is great news, especially for the digest readers. I've
got another question on this topic. How will DEMIME handle the occasional
HTML post that is perhaps inadvertently sent by a list member? For
, 2001 10:31 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: MIME, DEMIME, Paal, Pel, Pal, and digests
Doug Brewer wrote:
Now that MIME has been dealt a death blow...
Hi Doug,
You da Man!! This is great news, especially for the digest readers. I've
got another question on this topic. How will DEMIME
: RE: MIME, DEMIME, Paal, Pel, Pal, and digests
When you get one of those HTML messages, just change it to ASCII text
before
you reply to it. It's an easy thing to do. Then, your reply will be in
plain ASCII text too.
Len
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe
as your send
mode. That should fix your problem.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Peifer, William [OCDUS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:02 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: MIME, DEMIME, Paal, Pel, Pal, and digests
Hi Len,
The problem is not that I'm
Doug,
I owe you big time! Thanks very much. I am a bit sensitive for this, I had
to fight several times with the Dutch tax authorities about my umlaut. An
ASCII compliant name would have been easier:-)
Frits Wüthrich
Frits,
We've adjusted a variable in DEMIME to try to stop some of the
Frits J. Wüthrich wrote:
I had
to fight several times with the Dutch tax authorities about my umlaut.
Did you politely decline to pay any income tax that wasn't personally
addressed to you? :)
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001 21:43:46 -0400, Doug Brewer wrote:
Now that MIME has been dealt a death blow, [...]
I hate to say it, but I there's a reasonable chance that DEMIME is the
cause of the wrenched up high ASCII characters, like the a with circle
over it in Paal's name. :-|
TTYL, DougF
-
This
I'd say that's likely. My apologies to Paal, of course, but I think a cleaner list is
worth it. I =know= the digest readers will agree.
Doug
if it makes anyone feel better to mangle my name, please feel free
At 10:58 PM -04009/5/01, Doug Franklin wrote, or at least typed:
I hate to say it,
Well, I =could=, but that would be Wrong.
Doug
At 4:31 PM -08001/13/01, Barry I. Thorp caused thus to appear:
Hi;
Too bad you can't get it to reject messages with the words DIGEST or
TEST in the subject :)
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood Lake Photography
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nope. majordomo doesn't recognize MIME. In fact, I'm studying a
script for stripping MIME out and sending plain text.
Doug
At 8:18 PM +13001/12/01, David A. Mann caused thus to appear:
Another question for you:
Does the digest send in MIME format like the old list could?
Cheers,
-
Doug Brewer writes:
Nope. majordomo doesn't recognize MIME. In fact, I'm studying a
script for stripping MIME out and sending plain text.
I'm not talking about majordomo recognising MIME postings. I mean
sending the digest itself as a multipart MIME message so my mail client can
separate
Doug Brewer writes:
When I say that majordomo doesn't recognize MIME, I mean that
literally. Far as majordomo is concerned, MIME doesn't exist.
Everything sent to it is assumed to be plain text and treated
accordingly. So no, it cannot then generate a MIME digest.
Bummer. I guess I'll
Ed,
No, the good major will not recognize that you are changing options,
as they are essentially two different lists. The only real crossover
is that posts addressed to the digest list will be routed to the
regular list. You can subscribe to (or unsubscribe from) either or
both.
digest, so setting the size was a guessing game for
me. If any of you who prefer digests would let me know if it seems about right, I'd
appreciate it.
In other news, the move to a new host went off yesterday with no apparent ill effects,
other than a momentary panic when I realized the DNS
50 matches
Mail list logo
