William Robb wrote:
The problem with any extrapolated test, be it Wilhelm's
method, which is decidedly harsh, or Kodak's, which is not
really a longevity test at all, is that neither one real
tells you anything.
Wilhelms method tells you tat if you pump 450 lux into a
print for 12 hours per
- Original Message -
From: Otis Wright
Subject: Re: The Wilhelm testing method. Was Re: OT:
Photographic Materials
Can see you not into materials testing. Guess we can
forgo testing
contstruction in the future.
And this has what to do with testing longevity of
photographic
method. Was Re: OT:
Photographic Materials
Can see you not into materials testing. Guess we can
forgo testing
contstruction in the future.
And this has what to do with testing longevity of
photographic materials?
But really, do you test construction materials by seeing
how it reacts
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Otis Wright
Subject: Re: The Wilhelm testing method. Was Re: OT:
Photographic Materials
Can see you not into materials testing. Guess we can
forgo testing
contstruction in the future.
And this has what to do
:
- Original Message -
From: Otis Wright
Subject: Re: The Wilhelm testing method. Was Re: OT:
Photographic Materials
Can see you not into materials testing. Guess we can
forgo testing
contstruction in the future.
And this has what to do with testing longevity
]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 7:36 PM
Subject: The Wilhelm testing method. Was Re: OT: Photographic Materials
The problem with any extrapolated test, be it Wilhelm's
method, which is decidedly harsh, or Kodak's, which is not
really a longevity test at all, is that neither one really
tells
The problem with any extrapolated test, be it Wilhelm's
method, which is decidedly harsh, or Kodak's, which is not
really a longevity test at all, is that neither one really
tells you anything.
Wilhelms method tells you tat if you pump 450 lux into a
print for 12 hours per day, it will start to
7 matches
Mail list logo
