On 3/10/2011 6:17 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
Don't forget the 10/90 rule - 10% of the job takes 90% of the time
allocated; the remainder of the job takes the other 90%.
Hmmm. Well, I was referring to 20/80 rule which is the same as your but
with different distribution points, so to say.
Boris
From: Boris Liberman
On 3/5/2011 3:27 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
It seems that the more serious photography I do, the lower the
percentage of time I spend actually taking pictures.
-- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
Larry, you're a programmer, right? So you ought to know that 80-20
r
On Mar 7, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Theodore Beilby wrote:
> Our family vacations in the 50's & 60's were camping trips to Big Basin. It
> is a
> very nice place and I would imagine you could some beautiful shots there.
> Last
> time I was there, was drive through visit in the 70's with Diane and it
Maybe you could take a closer look at your work flow when shooting?
When shooting gigs like this, is the light static?
If so, there is a fat chance you could standardise more than it seems
you are doing now.
--
MaritimTim
http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pd
"Larry. To it seems that your main problem is that you shoot way to
many frames."
Of course, Larry, this observation is not meant to undervalue your
many, many minor problems.
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
> Larry. To it seems that your main problem is that you shoot way to
On Mar 7, 2011, at 5:05 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
> Larry. To it seems that your main problem is that you shoot way to many
> frames.
>
> Today at the elders day centre I had six models and shot 60 frames in
> a bot more than one hour.
> You shot for three hours and ended up with 1200 frames, how m
I really hope to do that. I've always wondered what it would be
like to stand among them. The photos I've seen have never given me a
true sense of them, so I'm really curious what they're like in real
perspective.
-- Walt
On 3/7/2011 1:01 PM, Theodore Beilby wrote:
Our family vacations
Larry. To it seems that your main problem is that you shoot way to many frames.
Today at the elders day centre I had six models and shot 60 frames in
a bot more than one hour.
You shot for three hours and ended up with 1200 frames, how many
models did you shoot?
Maybe my subjects where more static
Our family vacations in the 50's & 60's were camping trips to Big Basin. It is
a
very nice place and I would imagine you could some beautiful shots there. Last
time I was there, was drive through visit in the 70's with Diane and it was so
crowded, we didn't even stop. Walter, you have to see th
Something tells me I wouldn't have had the same sort of opportunities if
I'd decided to go with a Canon or Nikon.
MARK!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Walter Gilbert"
Subject: Re: This seems backwards
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 10:31:25PM -0800, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> On Mar 6, 2011, at 8:08 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
>
> > With any luck, we'll be able to rectify that issue once I get out to San
> > Ramon.
>
> A couple of friends and I went hot tubbing at Kiva tonight and someone was
> talkin
On 2011-03-07 2:51, Larry Colen wrote:
I wonder if there's a brand that makes it easier to find someone to date. And
I don't mean carbon dating.
As long as you don't mind goldbricks, the gold one with all the bling
helps with the dating thing. :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax
On Mar 7, 2011, at 5:06 AM, Stan Halpin wrote:
> Larry, I would suggest a #4 for your list of what the customer expects: The
> ability to know the difference between best quality and not so best quality
> photos.
> In other words, I agree that customers would like to chose which photo(s) to
>
On Mar 7, 2011, at 5:45 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> What I try to offer to my customers is the best quality photographs for the
> lowest cost. My biggest cost is my time. If I were paying myself minimum
> wage for the photography work, the company would be running way in the red.
> To get gr
Reply interspersed.
On 3/7/2011 12:45 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Mar 7, 2011, at 12:50 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Aren't you just describing what sets apart a professional and an
amateur - the right and cost of making a mistake?
In a large part that is true.
Good. In a sense that it means th
On Mar 7, 2011, at 12:50 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> On 3/7/2011 2:35 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>
> Aren't you just describing what sets apart a professional and an amateur -
> the right and cost of making a mistake?
In a large part that is true.
> I am not sure I'd like to be one your custo
On 3/7/2011 2:35 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
My process of rating, choosing and sorting pictures is a lot faster
when they are just for me. Throw in the process of getting them to
select which prints they want, and other communications, and all of a
sudden my post processing time is about 3-4 times w
On 3/7/2011 2:10 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
Funny, I always thought mount Olympus meant something entirely different.
Just don't let 'em know we're onto 'em.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit t
On Mar 6, 2011, at 11:55 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
>
>
> On 3/7/2011 1:51 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> I suspect that with Canikon it's easier to find gear, but with Pentax it's
>> easier to find friends.
> Agreed. Well put.
>
>> I wonder if there's a brand that makes it easier to find someone
On 3/7/2011 1:51 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I suspect that with Canikon it's easier to find gear, but with Pentax it's
easier to find friends.
Agreed. Well put.
I wonder if there's a brand that makes it easier to find someone to date. And
I don't mean carbon dating.
I think Olympus is suppo
On Mar 6, 2011, at 11:39 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
> They both look excellent!
>
> I get more stoked about this trip with each passing day. Up until now, I'd
> never been any further west than Picher, Oklahoma -- where I went with Ted.
> I have to say, the decision to buy my K-x has so far
They both look excellent!
I get more stoked about this trip with each passing day. Up until now,
I'd never been any further west than Picher, Oklahoma -- where I went
with Ted. I have to say, the decision to buy my K-x has so far proven
to be the best one I've ever made. Something tells
On Mar 6, 2011, at 8:08 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
> With any luck, we'll be able to rectify that issue once I get out to San
> Ramon.
A couple of friends and I went hot tubbing at Kiva tonight and someone was
talking about Hakone gardens:
http://www.hakone.com/
I've driven past zillions of
With any luck, we'll be able to rectify that issue once I get out to
San Ramon.
I'm still under 10,000 clicks on the K-x, so I clearly need to put in
the time and effort.
-- Walt
On 3/4/2011 7:27 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
It seems that the more serious photography I do, the lower the percen
Larry -
You might want to check this out -
www.shutterbugstorefront.com
You can set up a gallery, do minimal post processing and upload web
sized images from your customers to order from. The service collects
the money and sends you an order list. You finish PP, cropping, etc
just on the i
On Mar 6, 2011, at 6:51 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> On 3/5/2011 3:27 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> It seems that the more serious photography I do, the lower the percentage of
>> time I spend actually taking pictures.
>>
>> --
>> Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
>
> Larry, you're a pro
On 3/5/2011 3:27 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
It seems that the more serious photography I do, the lower the percentage of
time I spend actually taking pictures.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
Larry, you're a programmer, right? So you ought to know that 80-20 rule
- 80% of time yo
2011/3/5 Larry Colen :
> I just noticed how much more time I was spending
> on managing photos, and just quipped that in an
> attempt to make humor of my plight. I think that I
> was defining "serious" as "photography that I get
> paid for, or ought to".
What I thought you meant. And I loved the
On Mar 5, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> I think that I was defining "serious" as "photography that I get paid for,
>> or ought to".
>
> Ah, in that "or ought to" lurks the essential tragedy of the human
> condition. -T
I shouldn't
I'd have to Pan it.
Dan
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:39 PM, eckinator wrote:
> 2011/3/6 Daniel J. Matyola :
>>
>> Just hope he doesn't drop his trousers and eI'd have to Pan xpose his
>> Polaroids.
>
> Man that would be Tri-X
--
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PD
2011/3/6 Daniel J. Matyola :
>
> Just hope he doesn't drop his trousers and expose his Polaroids.
Man that would be Tri-X
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
t
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I think that I was defining "serious" as "photography that I get paid for, or
>ought to".
Ah, in that "or ought to" lurks the essential tragedy of the human
condition. -T
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailma
Just hope he doesn't drop his trousers and expose his Polaroids.
D
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 3:36 PM, mike wilson wrote:
> On 05/03/2011 18:48, Bob W wrote:
It seems that the more serious photography I do, the lower the
>>>
>>> percentage of time I spend actually taking pictures.
>>>
>>>
On Mar 5, 2011, at 11:51 AM, AlunFoto wrote:
> 2011/3/5 Larry Colen :
>> It seems that the more serious photography I do,
>> the lower the percentage of time I spend actually
>> taking pictures.
>
> Sounds like both good news and bad news. Dunno if that's what you
> mean, but "serious" sounds li
On 05/03/2011 18:48, Bob W wrote:
It seems that the more serious photography I do, the lower the
percentage of time I spend actually taking pictures.
that is how kennyboy started out. now he can expose velvia purely by
powers of the mind...
I hope he doesn't expose his velvia to me...
Alleg
2011/3/5 Larry Colen :
> It seems that the more serious photography I do,
> the lower the percentage of time I spend actually
> taking pictures.
Sounds like both good news and bad news. Dunno if that's what you
mean, but "serious" sounds like you spend more time managing your pics
and less time sh
> > It seems that the more serious photography I do, the lower the
> percentage of time I spend actually taking pictures.
>
> that is how kennyboy started out. now he can expose velvia purely by
> powers of the mind...
I hope he doesn't expose his velvia to me...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
2011/3/5 Larry Colen :
>
> It seems that the more serious photography I do, the lower the percentage of
> time I spend actually taking pictures.
that is how kennyboy started out. now he can expose velvia purely by
powers of the mind...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.
> It seems that the more serious photography I do, the lower the
> percentage of time I spend actually taking pictures.
>
> --
> Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
Then you should stop taking it seriously
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinf
Clearly, if your photography is "serious", you're Doing It Wrong. -T
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> It seems that the more serious photography I do, the lower the percentage of
> time I spend actually taking pictures.
>
> --
> Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
>
Eventually this will save a lot of money on lenses.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Sandy Harris wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> It seems that the more serious photography I do, the lower the percentage of
>> time I spend actually taking pictures.
>
> Mark!
>
> --
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> It seems that the more serious photography I do, the lower the percentage of
> time I spend actually taking pictures.
Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
It's the self loathing setting in.
On 3/4/2011 8:27 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
It seems that the more serious photography I do, the lower the percentage of
time I spend actually taking pictures.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to b
It seems that the more serious photography I do, the lower the percentage of
time I spend actually taking pictures.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, ple
44 matches
Mail list logo
