I regularly use the FA 35/2 on the K-5 or K-70 when I prefer to have a
compact set with me. I'm always happy with the results.
Reading the positive test results from Yoshihiko Takinami on his
website was the reason for me to buy this lens around the millennium change.
Remarkably his website is
I have that lens but haven’t used it in years. I generally use the DFA
24-70/2.8, an excellent lens.
Paul
> On Jun 18, 2023, at 10:24 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
>
> Ricoh does have the correct image on their site for a NEW lens:
>
>
Ricoh does have the correct image on their site for a NEW lens:
https://us.ricoh-imaging.com/product/smc-pentax-fa-35mm-f2-0-al/
It appears that just the refurbished lens has the wrong photo.
Also, Juan Buhler:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdbVcA5cTIs
On 6/16/2023 2:38 PM, Mark Roberts
I don't yet have the 24-70. I have the Tamron 28-75 which isn't weather sealed
and the dfa 28-105 which isn't f/2.8
On June 17, 2023 12:02:01 AM PDT, Stan Halpin
wrote:
>I have the DFA 15-30 which is a very nice lens. I have stopped carrying it
>when traveling - too large. For the occasional
I have the DFA 15-30 which is a very nice lens. I have stopped carrying it when
traveling - too large. For the occasional wide shot I carry an A series 20mm.
The 15-30,24-70, and 70-200 will probably be up for sale later this year -
still trying to resolve camera and lens needs vs my too large
coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
>https://us.ricoh-imaging.com/product/smc-pentax-fa-35mm-f2-0-al-refurbished/
For a moment I thought this was some kind of new, D-FA lens until I
realized they're simply referring to the old FA 35/2 and have the
wrong photo with it. (Perhaps they just use that as a
The Sigma EX 10-20mm is a heck of a lens for ultra wide.
KEH had two of the FA 35/2.0
I just snagged the LN- with caps & hood.
You all are STILL a bad influence on me.
:)
Darren Addy
Kearney, NE
On Friday, June 16, 2023, wrote:
> Larry Colen wrote:
>
> > I have the lens pictured, but that's
Larry Colen wrote:
> I have the lens pictured, but that's the 15-30/2.8
>
> If you search on the 35/2.0 it looks very different
>
> \--
> Larry Colen
> l...@red4est.com sent from ret13est
You’re right. Duh.
I had a 35/2 at one time. Rarely shoot wide angle so I parted with it. Now down
to 77
I have had one since it was first announced and guard it zealously. I'd
imagine other owners are just as protective. Looking at my current
catalog, I see it is eclipsed only by the FA50 1.4 in number of photos
produced.
I'm not certain how many were produced but I'm damn glad I got one.
On
The truth may be that owners of the FA 35-F2 don't want to sell it. For
myself that is definitely true.
Henk
Op do 15 jun 2023 om 18:59 schreef :
>
> https://us.ricoh-imaging.com/product/smc-pentax-fa-35mm-f2-0-al-refurbished/
>
> Never saw one anywhere other than the website. No used ones for
> On Jun 15, 2023, at 9:59 AM, coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
>
> https://us.ricoh-imaging.com/product/smc-pentax-fa-35mm-f2-0-al-refurbished/
>
> Never saw one anywhere other than the website. No used ones for sale that I
> can see. The old Boz site doesn’t list it.
I have the lens
https://us.ricoh-imaging.com/product/smc-pentax-fa-35mm-f2-0-al-refurbished/
Never saw one anywhere other than the website. No used ones for sale that I can
see. The old Boz site doesn’t list it.
I’m even wondering why it ever existed.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe
12 matches
Mail list logo
