On 2013-09-12 1:37, Zos Xavius wrote:
Oh, I was looking at pentaxforums prices and saw 1500. I swear
pentaxforums reviews manipulate prices. So you are saying that the 400
is worth less? Interesting. I'd actually love to pick up a 400 even if
it said sigma on it. Those lenses were supposedly
That's a horse of a different color. You really can't compare the asking
price of a Pentax Medium Format lens from a private seller with KEH's
price for a third party 35mm camera lens.
On 9/12/2013 11:49 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:
I can too! :P
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:44 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
That's a horse of a different color. You really can't compare the asking
price of a Pentax Medium Format lens from a private seller with KEH's
price for a third party 35mm camera lens.
On 9/12/2013 11:49 AM,
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/photographic-equipment-sale/236840-sale-pentax-67-400mm-f4.html
Of courseno automation...larger...heavier...but faster at least. :)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Doug Franklin do...@nutdriver.org wrote:
On 2013-09-12 1:37, Zos Xavius wrote:
Oh, I was
On 9/12/2013 9:32 AM, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2013-09-12 1:37, Zos Xavius wrote:
Oh, I was looking at pentaxforums prices and saw 1500. I swear
pentaxforums reviews manipulate prices. So you are saying that the 400
is worth less? Interesting. I'd actually love to pick up a 400 even if
it said
They average $1500 used usually. $90 seems like quite the steal, ugly
condition or not.
http://www.keh.com/camera/Pentax-Manual-Focus-Non-Mfg-Fixed-Focal-Length-Lenses/1/sku-PK080090382060?r=FE
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 03:37:57PM -0400, Zos Xavius wrote:
They average $1500 used usually. $90 seems like quite the steal, ugly
condition or not.
http://www.keh.com/camera/Pentax-Manual-Focus-Non-Mfg-Fixed-Focal-Length-Lenses/1/sku-PK080090382060?r=FE
For about a C-note, it's probably
KEH UG - Ugly Very rough looking. Multiple impressions in metal,
excessive finish loss and brassing. Glass will have marks, fungus and/or
haze which will affect picture quality.*
which will affect picture quality says it all for me. It's not might
affect picture quality, it's *WILL* affect
OhI thought that ugly lenses were still ok optically. Yeah, you
are right it probably has fungus or something really awful.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:19 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
KEH UG - Ugly Very rough looking. Multiple impressions in metal,
excessive finish loss and brassing.
I'm with John on this one. Somebody ELSE can have THAT steal.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:19 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
KEH UG - Ugly Very rough looking. Multiple impressions in metal,
excessive finish loss and brassing. Glass will have marks, fungus and/or
haze which will affect
Thanks - I'll let you know how it checks it.
stan
On Sep 11, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
I'm with John on this one. Somebody ELSE can have THAT steal.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:19 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
KEH UG - Ugly Very rough looking. Multiple impressions in
Non manufacturer 400s average $1500? Not on this planet.
Paul via phone
On Sep 11, 2013, at 7:54 PM, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
Thanks - I'll let you know how it checks it.
stan
On Sep 11, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
I'm with John on this one. Somebody
Oh, I was looking at pentaxforums prices and saw 1500. I swear
pentaxforums reviews manipulate prices. So you are saying that the 400
is worth less? Interesting. I'd actually love to pick up a 400 even if
it said sigma on it. Those lenses were supposedly very good and work
well with matching TCs.
13 matches
Mail list logo
