Hello Frank,
Monday, October 3, 2005, 4:12:06 PM, you wrote:
FW how about the Konica Minolta Dimage scan dual IV?
FW Looks like a nice scanner to me? Anyone use this one?
FW Frank
I use the Scan Dual IV for scanning color negatives and I'm pleased
with the results. I use Vuescan instead of the
Hi all,
I'm not yet ready to dump my analog camera and buy a digital camera (for
example a ist-ds). In fact I want to wait for the istD2 and hope it has an
aperture coupler so I'll be able to use my K/M lenses as I'm used to.
However, the prices of prints is getting outrageous, about six times
Hi,
i'm using my Epson 3170 for medium format film and for 35mm too.
So far it is good for my needs.
And it was cheap - around $250
Gasha
Frank Wajer wrote:
Hi all,
I'm not yet ready to dump my analog camera and buy a digital camera (for
example a ist-ds). In fact I want to wait for the
Hi again,
how about the Konica Minolta Dimage scan dual IV?
Looks like a nice scanner to me? Anyone use this one?
Frank
Frank Wajer wrote on 03.10.05 15:12:
how about the Konica Minolta Dimage scan dual IV?
Looks like a nice scanner to me? Anyone use this one?
You'd better look for Elite II because it has hardware based dust and
scratches removal (ICE) - it saves a lot of time. Dual IV does it via
software and
I'd not worry about the aperture coupler, the *ist-Ds2 is unlikely to
have new mechanical features, it's mostly the *ist-Ds electronics in a
*ist-DL body shell.
Frank Wajer wrote:
Hi all,
I'm not yet ready to dump my analog camera and buy a digital camera (for
example a ist-ds). In fact I
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Frank Wajer wrote on 03.10.05 15:12:
how about the Konica Minolta Dimage scan dual IV?
Looks like a nice scanner to me? Anyone use this one?
You'd better look for Elite II because it has hardware based dust and
scratches removal (ICE) - it saves a lot of time. Dual
Frank mentioned the D2 not the DS2. The D2 might have full mechanical
coupling, but I do consider that unlikely.
-Adam
P. J. Alling wrote:
I'd not worry about the aperture coupler, the *ist-Ds2 is unlikely to
have new mechanical features, it's mostly the *ist-Ds electronics in a
*ist-DL
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, P. J. Alling wrote:
Frank Wajer wrote:
I'm not yet ready to dump my analog camera and buy a digital camera (for
example a ist-ds). In fact I want to wait for the istD2 and hope it has an
aperture coupler so I'll be able to use my K/M lenses as I'm used to.
I'd not worry
I'm beginning to think that the Ds2 is the D2 at this point. I expect a
new body and new name for a truly upgraded body, sorry.
Adam Maas wrote:
Frank mentioned the D2 not the DS2. The D2 might have full mechanical
coupling, but I do consider that unlikely.
-Adam
P. J. Alling wrote:
I'd
I'm on the precipice of enablement for one of these. I'll be interested to
see what others say. Comments in the PDML archives are generally positive.
t
On 10/3/05 6:12, Frank Wajer wrote:
Hi again,
how about the Konica Minolta Dimage scan dual IV?
Looks like a nice scanner to me? Anyone
I'd not worry about the aperture coupler, the *ist-Ds2 is unlikely to
have new mechanical features, it's mostly the *ist-Ds electronics in a
*ist-DL body shell.
I was thinking about the D2 not the DS2.
Frank
Frank Wajer wrote:
Hi all,
I'm not yet ready to dump my analog camera
put a
priority on Digital Ice even at the expense of less resolution.
RCB
- Original Message -
From: Frank Wajer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 7:52 AM
Subject: advice for filmscanner
Hi all,
I'm not yet ready to dump my analog camera
Hello Frank,
If you are shooting 35mm only and mostly print film rather than
slides, it would be a good choice. I have used the Scan dual II for
several years and am happy with it's price/performance.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, October 3, 2005, 6:12:06 AM, you wrote:
FW Hi again,
FW
I used Acer ScanWit 2740 (with ICE) some time ago.
Film holder was excellent. And bundled software worked ok.
Minoltas bundled software was not easy to use, so you have to try
SilverFast or something else.
Gasha
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello Frank,
If you are shooting 35mm only and mostly
On Oct 3, 2005, at 4:52 AM, Frank Wajer wrote:
... the prices of prints is getting outrageous, about six times
more expensive than internet printing services. So I'm thinking
about buying a filmscanner ... I need a cheap solution that gives
me good pictures up to 13x18 cm prints. ...
, the Scan Dual IV produces results equal
to other scanners costing twice the price.
Tom C.
From: Tim Sherburne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: Pentax Discussion List pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: advice for filmscanner
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 07:43:20 -0700
: Tim Sherburne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: Pentax Discussion List pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: advice for filmscanner
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 07:43:20 -0700
I'm on the precipice of enablement for one of these. I'll be interested to
see what others say
Tim,
Most of what I'm interested in scanning are BW negatives, which do
NOT work with ICE at all.
ICE is an excellent aid/convenience if you have older negatives/
slides that are both compatible and slightly damaged or dusty. I've
worked with several scanners that supported it but never
Discussion List pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: advice for filmscanner
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 11:46:27 -0700
Tom (and other film scanner owners), do you think Digital ICE support in
the
hardware is worthwhile?
From what I can tell, the Konica-Minolta Elite series has hardware ICE
while
-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 4:56 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: advice for filmscanner
Tim,
Most of what I'm interested in scanning are BW negatives, which do
NOT work with ICE at all.
ICE is an excellent aid
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 11:46:27 -0700, Tim Sherburne wrote:
Tom (and other film scanner owners), do you think Digital ICE support
in the hardware is worthwhile?
If you're not scanning chromes or silver-based BW negatives,
ABSOLUTELY! It's saved me untold hours of spotting scanned
negatives.
-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: advice for filmscanner
Tom (and other film scanner owners), do you think Digital ICE support in
the
hardware is worthwhile?
ICE works fine on chromes, except for Kodachrome.
Shel
If you're not scanning chromes or silver-based BW negatives,
ABSOLUTELY! It's saved me untold hours of spotting scanned
negatives.
Frank,
I have a Canon 8400F. It comes with 35mm strip, 35mm slide and medium
format carriers. I've had decent luck scanning print film. I
wouldn't recommend it for slides. A little photochopping has been
required for everything scanned thus far. Knowing now the cons of
using a flatbed
25 matches
Mail list logo
