no kidding! I had no idea.
but then A optics are really WAY better!
would that mean that there'd be a similar diff between K and A versions
of 50/1.2? or 50/1.7?
hmmm... reconsidering the dusty lens issue...
Daphne
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Odds? 1:1 or 100%
DOF characteristics change with optical design.
Then there's construction tolerances. A minute difference
in the actual diameter of the iris can change DOF
noticably on 35mm. You won't see it in landscapes
but you could easily see it on close-focus work.
And, yes, the A coa
Is the dust even noticeable in a print Daphne? Sometimes it can look bad but
not affect print/picture quality.
Norm
Daphne wrote:
> took it to the alleged 'best' repair lab in town. Erlcih's, if anyone
> ever heard of that local celebrity (which I doubt somehow). here is how
> it went :
> specia
well, until you compare the print to the identical one taken with the
50/1.4-A, all looks good. once you do compare them you see that the pics
taken with the K lens are slightly less sharp and constrasty... also the
dept of field seems to be different (at the same aperture, the pics
taken with the
4 matches
Mail list logo
