Re: big glass and converters

2004-06-03 Thread Gonz
om: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 9:36 AM Subject: big glass and converters Just out of curiousity, what's not credible about the *istD? I know a lot of pros using Nikon D100s or Canon 10Ds, both of which

Re: big glass and converters

2004-06-03 Thread Paul Stenquist
sed since i got my *istD. some of them will have to go. Herb - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 9:36 AM Subject: big glass and converters Just out of curiousity, what's not c

Re: big glass and converters

2004-06-03 Thread Herb Chong
hursday, June 03, 2004 9:36 AM Subject: big glass and converters > Just out of curiousity, what's not credible about the *istD? I know a lot > of pros using Nikon D100s or Canon 10Ds, both of which are very similar > featurewise. The feature that I find the *istD lacking most for

big glass and converters

2004-06-03 Thread edwin
>From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >an option for me, by preference, and if Pentax doesn't have a creditable >high end DSLR announced by then, it's time to switch. Just out of curiousity, what's not credible about the *istD? I know a lot of pros using Nikon D100s or Canon 10Ds, both of whic