Very late reply:
I have, but the results were not very good.
NOT a fault with the camera, but with the brain behind the eye behind
the viewfinder.
On 6/28/2023 9:29 AM, coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
Anyone here EVER use the double-exposure capacity of the LX?
I always thought it was cool,
The K2 method is no different than any other camera with a rewind button on the
bottom.
The LX was clearly special.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
I vaguely remember trying it a couple of times back in the 80's -I
mostly did double exposures in the darkroom.
ann
On 6/28/2023 3:52 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
I've used it. It worked in so far as the frames lined up properly.
On 6/28/2023 9:29 AM, coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
Anyone here
Pretty sure the K2 could do it too. I remember using it once.
Cheers,
Dave
> On Jun 29, 2023, at 1:29 AM, coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
>
> Anyone here EVER use the double-exposure capacity of the LX?
>
> I always thought it was cool, but never needed it so never got one.
>
> (The only
I've used it. It worked in so far as the frames lined up properly.
On 6/28/2023 9:29 AM, coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
Anyone here EVER use the double-exposure capacity of the LX?
I always thought it was cool, but never needed it so never got one.
(The only other PK body I’ve seen with
Anyone here EVER use the double-exposure capacity of the LX?
I always thought it was cool, but never needed it so never got one.
(The only other PK body I’ve seen with double-exposure is that Promaster 2500
PK)
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to
t: for Ann: Photographer Spots Curious Coincidences on New York City
> Sidewalks
>
> https://petapixel.com/2021/11/17/photographer-spots-curious-coincidences-on-new-york-city-sidewalks/
>
> Have fun!
>
> Henk
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsub
nteresting and effective group of images. I have
seen --
and admired -- Kogan's work previously.
It is hardly fair to call these photographs "Curious Coincidences on New
York City Sidewalks." With one or two possible exceptions, they are not
scenes that were simply there to
tery..
and likewise you posting an article titled "coincidence" just after this
happened and directing it to me. what fun!
ann
.
On 11/17/2021 2:23 PM, Henk Terhell wrote:
https://petapixel.com/2021/11/17/photographer-spots-curious-coincidences-on-new-york-city-sidewalks/
Have fun!
H
n" would be a better word, but I think "coincidence"
does work for the subject matter.
On 11/17/2021 2:36 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
That is a very interesting and effective group of images. I have seen --
and admired -- Kogan's work previously.
It is hardly fair to call
That is a very interesting and effective group of images. I have seen --
and admired -- Kogan's work previously.
It is hardly fair to call these photographs "Curious Coincidences on New
York City Sidewalks." With one or two possible exceptions, they are not
scenes that w
https://petapixel.com/2021/11/17/photographer-spots-curious-coincidences-on-new-york-city-sidewalks/
Have fun!
Henk
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
Maybe staged (posed?) somehow rather than photoshopped?
On 11/9/2021 2:22 AM, Toine wrote:
First guess would be a lucky shot. In his collection I see many more
damselflies posing in groups. He must have found a way to enforce lucky
shots...
On Tue, 9 Nov 2021, 00:48 Igor PDML-StR, wrote:
First guess would be a lucky shot. In his collection I see many more
damselflies posing in groups. He must have found a way to enforce lucky
shots...
On Tue, 9 Nov 2021, 00:48 Igor PDML-StR, wrote:
>
>
> Well, not quite that spelling, but I couldn't resist. :-)
>
>
Well, not quite that spelling, but I couldn't resist. :-)
https://seuppcdn01.1x.com/images/user/5dcd47081982253f66cc064214a9c63c-hd4.jpg
And the photographer, Abdul Gapur Dayak, - has a rather interesting
collection:
https://1x.com/photo/2070376
I am not sure if these photos are
ters) weighs
over 10 000 tons. Due to the shortage of steel, Shukhov's tower is
only 160-meters tall.
Based on this idea, in 2005-2009, a 600-meter-high hyperboloid Canton
tower was built in Guangzhou, China. (For a brief moment it was the
tallest tower in the world, taking over that titl
Due to the shortage of steel, Shukhov's tower is only
160-meters tall.
Based on this idea, in 2005-2009, a 600-meter-high hyperboloid Canton
tower was built in Guangzhou, China. (For a brief moment it was the
tallest tower in the world, taking over that title from the CN Tower in
Toronto.)
A c
On 2015-02-15 23:22 , Darren Addy wrote:
There is one for $625 on Denver's Craigslist right now
*cough*
People tend to sell for less than whatever they bought it for, which
may be quite disconnected from the current new prices. With any SDM
lens, I would be suspicious of AF motor problems
is priced at around 1000 USD or
slightly higher, and could be bought at or slightly below $900 during the
Black Friday/Cyber Monday sales.
However, I see that used they go much below that point. E.g. I saw one listed
at $620 or so on PF, and there is one BIN at $650 on ebay.
So, I am curious
, and there is one BIN at $650 on ebay.
So, I am curious why there is such a big difference between the new and
used prices on this lens?
Any thoughts?
I am not on the market for this lens, as I have it. So, my question is
purely academic at this point.
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
on ebay.
So, I am curious why there is such a big difference between the new and used
prices on this lens?
Any thoughts?
I am not on the market for this lens, as I have it. So, my question is
purely academic at this point.
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
to the 2013 edition of The Best American Travel Writing,
Jason Wilson includes some curious quotes from reviews of the HCB
retrospective exhibition at MOMA several years ago:
The show was deemed 'almost unenduringly majestic' by The New Yorker's Peter
Schjeldshl, who gave this stern
Hi Everyone:
In the foreword to the 2013 edition of The Best American Travel Writing, Jason
Wilson includes some curious quotes from reviews of the HCB retrospective
exhibition at MOMA several years ago:
The show was deemed 'almost unenduringly majestic' by The New Yorker's Peter
Schjeldshl
a casual observer.
anyway, I love HCB and thought that the exhibit was poorly curated
and did him a disservice.
ann
On 5/15/2014 17:32, Christine Aguila wrote:
Hi Everyone:
In the foreword to the 2013 edition of The Best American Travel Writing, Jason
Wilson includes some curious quotes from
Well first off, the critics quoted come off as exactly the kind of
pretentious, self-important wankers who give art and artists a bad
name. They're the visual equivalent of wine snobs (flaccid!,
absurd!, fruity, yet arrogant).
I understand Frank's criticism and agree to a limited extent, but he
was poorly curated
and did him a disservice.
ann
On 5/15/2014 17:32, Christine Aguila wrote:
Hi Everyone:
In the foreword to the 2013 edition of The Best American Travel Writing,
Jason Wilson includes some curious quotes from reviews of the HCB
retrospective exhibition at MOMA several
I think I agree with you Mark about Frank's comments, and think the point,
which I might agree with to a degree, is made a bit too sharply.
Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
On May 15, 2014, at 5:32 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Well first off, the critics quoted
not, so I don't :-(
As you can see from the sign, the play showing at the theatre in the
Photo is The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night Time. It's
been canceled because the ceiling of the theatre collapsed in early
December. Hence, a curious incident.
What happened to the dog? Hope he
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london1/7de01340.html
If you've followed the news from London in the past couple of months
you'll get the title...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
Oh dear..
ann
On 1/27/2014 12:26, Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london1/7de01340.html
If you've followed the news from London in the past couple of months
you'll get the title...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I am sure I missed some of the photos from the series, but
I like some of the HDR shots, especially this one:
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london1/7de0141122.html
The one you posted to the list,
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london1/7de0122932.html
is nice as well.
But in the
I have not, so I don't :-(
Cheers,
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
On 27 January 2014 12:26, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
the sign, the play showing at the theatre in the
Photo is The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night Time. It's
been canceled because the ceiling of the theatre collapsed in early
December. Hence, a curious incident.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML
Curious indeed! No dog, and a daytime picture! (and an intriguing one, at that)
On Jan 27, 2014, at 12:26 , Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london1/7de01340.html
If you've followed the news from London in the past couple of months
you'll get the title
I'm not sure it's curiosity, looks more like sizing up for a strafing run...
On 4/13/2011 4:37 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Like the curious tilt of the head. Fun at the lake.
The sun was in and out and I may have out exposed the shutter a wee bit. heck!
Comments encourages.
Jack
http
...
On 4/13/2011 4:37 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Like the curious tilt of the head. Fun at the lake.
The sun was in and out and I may have out exposed the shutter a wee bit.
heck!
Comments encourages.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=588
K-5, DA 55~300@300mm, f/8, 1
Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: Curious Gull
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, April 13, 2011, 9:22 PM
Great tilt of the head, Jack.
Nice catch. Yields a nice animal expression. Crop is a
little tight for my eye. Would prefer a bit more space
around
LoL.. Could have been, Peter. One of them left a deposit on my windshield while
parked that day. Actually, he looks sorta guilty at that. ;)
Jack
--- On Thu, 4/14/11, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PESO: Curious Gull
Thanks, Paul. I got a bit shutter speed over zealous for the changing light.
May have been conditions for TAV.(?)
Jack
--- On Thu, 4/14/11, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
From: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Curious Gull
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Nice capture overall.
I agree with Paul on the overexposure.
I'd like a little more room between the wing tips the image edges.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Curious
also feel it's a slightly tight crop.
This image has about come to the end of its life and, alas, will go out in its
present form. ;)
Jack
--- On Thu, 4/14/11, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
From: Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com
Subject: Re: PESO: Curious Gull
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
Like the curious tilt of the head. Fun at the lake.
The sun was in and out and I may have out exposed the shutter a wee bit. heck!
Comments encourages.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=588
K-5, DA 55~300@300mm, f/8, 1/8000, ISO 1600
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Very nice gull! Well framed (cropped?).
On Apr 13, 2011, at 4:37 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Like the curious tilt of the head. Fun at the lake.
The sun was in and out and I may have out exposed the shutter a wee bit. heck!
Comments encourages.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload
Yes, cropped. (About 50%)
Thankk you, Stan!
Jack)
--- On Wed, 4/13/11, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
From: Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info
Subject: Re: PESO: Curious Gull
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, April 13, 2011, 3:14 PM
Very nice
Of Jack
Davis
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 3:37 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO: Curious Gull
Like the curious tilt of the head. Fun at the lake.
The sun was in and out and I may have out exposed the shutter a wee bit.
heck!
Comments encourages.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com
Thanks, Jeff! There is a bit of bloom on the head due to slight over exposure.
Not a lot, but I would rather it not be there.
Jack
--- On Wed, 4/13/11, Jeffery Johnson jefferytjohn...@bellsouth.net wrote:
From: Jeffery Johnson jefferytjohn...@bellsouth.net
Subject: RE: PESO: Curious Gull
It isn't too bad Jack
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Jack
Davis
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 8:07 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: PESO: Curious Gull
Thanks, Jeff! There is a bit of bloom on the head due
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 3:37 PM
Subject: PESO: Curious Gull
Like the curious tilt of the head. Fun at the lake.
The sun was in and out and I may have out exposed the shutter a wee bit.
heck!
Comments encourages.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=588
K-5, DA
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:20 AM, AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com wrote:
Elephant seals are strange animals...
As mammals come, their investment in parental care is pretty scant.
Blog link only this time, since there are two pics:
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com/2009/12/curious-pup.html
Looks like
Elephant seals are strange animals...
As mammals come, their investment in parental care is pretty scant.
Blog link only this time, since there are two pics:
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com/2009/12/curious-pup.html
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML
Interesting behavioral moments, Jostein!
Jack
--- On Sat, 12/5/09, AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com wrote:
From: AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com
Subject: PESO - Curious pup
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, December 5, 2009, 6:20 AM
Elephant seals are strange
animals
/curious-pup.html
Jostein
===
Love the photo of the pup sniffing the guy.
envy for trip Not that I could stand all that cold and snow, I couldn't.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
-
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we
I had this on my ebay watch list and no one seems to have bought. Not
that I'm interested either (my FA85 and the phrase cold dead hands comes
to mind), but who would make a generic 85/1.4 lens. Seems odd
Looks Tokina-ish
Samyang.
http://www.syopt.co.kr/eng/product/manual_zoom.asp
Bob
I had this on my ebay watch list and no one seems to have bought. Not
that I'm interested either (my FA85 and the phrase cold dead
hands comes
to mind), but who would make a generic 85/1.4 lens. Seems odd
Looks
Interestingly, it's an Aspherical design, which is somewhat exotic for
an 85. Wonder if it's any good.
Loks like Samyang may be looking at moving up in the lens world.
They're currently the replacement for Cosina at the low end of the 3rd
party market.
-Adam
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Bob
Hi!
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Loks like Samyang may be looking at moving up in the lens world.
They're currently the replacement for Cosina at the low end of the 3rd
party market.
Adam, is the above the long version of rubbish?
;-)
Boris
--
PDML
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Loks like Samyang may be looking at moving up in the lens world.
They're currently the replacement for Cosina at the low end of the 3rd
party
I've FA 77 limited which serves all my moderate tele needs just nicely ;-).
Adam Maas wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Loks like Samyang may be looking at moving up in the
Wierd. They note it goes to f22 but the one in the
eBay ad only stopped to f16.
-Brendan
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Samyang.
http://www.syopt.co.kr/eng/product/manual_zoom.asp
Bob
I had this on my ebay watch list and no one seems
to have bought. Not
that I'm interested
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samyang.
http://www.syopt.co.kr/eng/product/manual_zoom.asp
Bob
Reported Attack Site!
This web site at www.syopt.co.kr has been reported as an attack site and
has been blocked based on your security preferences.
I had this on my ebay watch list and no
Possibly anyone interested for Pentax might be put off by the lens
mount, which is apparently Nikon F. So anyone looking for Pentax lenses
would look elsewhere, and anyone looking for Nikon lenses wouldn't
bother to look...
Derby Chang wrote:
I had this on my ebay watch list and no one
If only.
I've been waiting for this lens since it was announced. I still need to
decide between it and the Sigma 100-300 f4, but I couldn't bring myself
to buy the Sigma without comparing it to this lens.
Soon. Soon.
Leon
http://www.bluering.org.au
http://www.bluering.org.au/leon
P. J.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/07/04 Fri AM 02:07:13 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Got curious about announced Pentax Products
This one seem like quite the bargain...
http://www.parkcameras.com/ProductDetails/mcs/productID/5298
Not once you
Well it is a bargain, it's made of the rarest material known to man
unobtainium yet sells for zero yes zero dollars...
Leon Altoff wrote:
If only.
I've been waiting for this lens since it was announced. I still need to
decide between it and the Sigma 100-300 f4, but I couldn't bring myself
]
Sent: 04 July 2008 03:07
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Got curious about announced Pentax Products
This one seem like quite the bargain...
http://www.parkcameras.com/ProductDetails/mcs/productID/5298
--
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
-- Dr. Jerry Pournelle
--
PDML
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of P. J. Alling [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 July 2008 03:07
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Got curious about announced Pentax Products
This one seem like quite the bargain...
http://www.parkcameras.com
Great, I'll put my name down for one!
John
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of P. J. Alling [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 July 2008 14:46
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Got curious about announced Pentax Products
It seems
This one seem like quite the bargain...
http://www.parkcameras.com/ProductDetails/mcs/productID/5298
--
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
-- Dr. Jerry Pournelle
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
I agree - I would pay two or three times as much for this lens.
stan
On Jul 3, 2008, at 9:07 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
This one seem like quite the bargain...
http://www.parkcameras.com/ProductDetails/mcs/productID/5298
--
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
-- Dr. Jerry
Yeah, this is a recurring scam. And it's usually the FA* 85/1.4
that's offered.
On May 9, 2008, at 10:47 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
I know we shouldn't discuss current auctions here, but I am also
confident that no one here is foolish enough to bid on a dodgy one.
Does anyone else think it
I know we shouldn't discuss current auctions here, but I am also
confident that no one here is foolish enough to bid on a dodgy one.
Does anyone else think it strange that a certain auction site suddenly
has three FA* 85 F1.4s for sale?
Two are in China and one in Poland. I recall that this
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:03:02 -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Another lightroom bug: the lens used is not imported with PEF.
The lens data for older lenses is properly interpreted in both
Lightroom and Bridge/Camera Raw, regardless of whether I have the
camera set to create PEF or DNG files.
To be more precise about what I read (I will try to find back the post on DPR)
Pentax added a number in the field identifiying the lens. The added a
0 probably 'cos they want to expand available codes I guess. Of course
Lightroom do not understand anymore.
That's what I read. Can't check myself.
I noticed now and then that there were a few K10D PEF files that
neither Lightroom nor DNG Converter could read. Pentax Photo Browser
always reads them and can write them out as DNG files. Once that's
done, both LR and DNG Converter can read them.
Today I did a bunch of product shots and
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: curious K10D behavior ... possible bug ...
Seems to me that there must be something funky about the PEF file
created when the orientation sensor is in an ambiguous position... ??
I'll have alook at if mine does that too. I
I also noticed some files didn't import properly. Tried 2 test shots
facing and bingo one of them won't import.
Another lightroom bug: the lens used is not imported with PEF. I must
check DNG but PEF is smaller.
On 6/13/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed now and then that
On Jun 13, 2007, at 2:25 PM, Toine wrote:
I also noticed some files didn't import properly. Tried 2 test shots
facing and bingo one of them won't import.
Another lightroom bug: the lens used is not imported with PEF.
The lens data for older lenses is properly interpreted in both
Lightroom
The lens data bug is caused by firmware 1.20 I've read on DpReview.
Can't say more 'cos I run 1.10 no problem at all so far.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
2007/6/13, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I noticed now and
I use SilkyPix - the one you pay for. So far, with about 15,000
frames shot, I have not encountered the problem you are describing.
--
Bruce
Wednesday, June 13, 2007, 2:25:36 PM, you wrote:
T I also noticed some files didn't import properly. Tried 2 test shots
T facing and bingo one of them
On Jun 13, 2007, at 3:26 PM, Thibouille wrote:
The lens data bug is caused by firmware 1.20 I've read on DpReview.
Can't say more 'cos I run 1.10 no problem at all so far.
I've got 4000 exposures made with all versions of the K10D firmware
and all lenses, dating back to the beginning of
On Jun 13, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jun 13, 2007, at 3:26 PM, Thibouille wrote:
The lens data bug is caused by firmware 1.20 I've read on DpReview.
Can't say more 'cos I run 1.10 no problem at all so far.
I've got 4000 exposures made with all versions of the K10D
List
Emne: Re: curious
Thanks for looking. Interesting feedback on this one. Very different
from what was said when I first showed these (in color) some years ago.
Paul
On Mar 3, 2007, at 1:51 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
My feeling exactly re: being staged or set up.
Shel
[Original Message
to the content or the execution? Or perhaps it
never made it to the list. No big deal, just curious.
Paul
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5667450size=md
I ddn't see it before, but having seen it now, I agree with marnie, it
looks a bit too 'arranged', and I think the framing highlights
made it to the list. No big deal, just curious.
Paul
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5667450size=md
===
It looks too deliberate to me -- carefully laid out and posed. From
the
towel, to the beer cans, to the cigarette pack carefully sticking out
of her
pocket
Thanks for looking. Interesting feedback on this one. Very different
from what was said when I first showed these (in color) some years ago.
Paul
On Mar 3, 2007, at 1:51 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
My feeling exactly re: being staged or set up.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL
not as well executed perhaps.
Is the total silence due to the content or the execution? Or perhaps
it
never made it to the list. No big deal, just curious.
Paul
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5667450size=md
I ddn't see it before, but having seen it now, I agree with marnie, it
looks
On 3/3/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was posed. This lady and I did a whole series of posed shots in a
trailer park.
I personally have no misgivings in regard to staging a photograph,
although I don't want them to look posed.
That's fine by me. Show us the rest of them?
-social
environment.
It's not unlike an Arbus pic, although not as well executed
perhaps.
Is the total silence due to the content or the execution? Or
perhaps
it
never made it to the list. No big deal, just curious.
Paul
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5667450size=md
Thanks. Yes, I'll post a small gallery in another message.
Paul
On Mar 3, 2007, at 8:19 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
On 3/3/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was posed. This lady and I did a whole series of posed shots in a
trailer park.
I personally have no misgivings in regard to
, just curious.
Paul
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5667450size=md
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
___
_
Yahoo! Music Unlimited
Hi Paul,
I recall some of the earlier pics, some of which I liked, and while I
recognize that they, too, were set-ups, this one comes across as more
artificial-looking than what I remember the earlier pics to be.
Of course, over time, our perspectives change, changing the way we view
photos and
Paul, what part of LA (lower alabama) was that picture taken?
:-)
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks for the feedback, Shel.
I posted a small series. It's here:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=701586
I'm surprised that the disc never arrived. I sent it over a week ago.
If it doesn't come in the next few days, I'll mail another one. I was
wondering why you didn't report
It was taken in Pontiac, Michigan. It was the only really decrepit
trailer park we were able to find. This particular trailer was
abandoned.
Paul
On Mar 3, 2007, at 10:19 AM, Walter Hamler wrote:
Paul, what part of LA (lower alabama) was that picture taken?
:-)
Walt
--
PDML
It was posted twice FWI.
I looked @ it believe you had posted it a few years ago.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 11:54 PM
Subject: Re: curious
In a message dated 3/2/2007 8:17:24 P.M. Pacific Standard Time
Paul Stenquist wrote:
It was taken in Pontiac, Michigan. It was the only really decrepit
trailer park we were able to find. This particular trailer was
abandoned.
Holy cow, Paul! You folks have some really well preserved trailer parks
up there. Down here, what's shown in those photos would
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I personally have no misgivings in regard to staging a photograph,
although I don't want them to look posed.
If you do another trailer park series, get the wardrobe and props from
the local Salvation Army or Goodwill store or something so they'll look
lived in. :-)
--
That's exactly where we bought them -- Salvation Army. Right down the
street from the TP.
Paul
On Mar 3, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I personally have no misgivings in regard to staging a photograph,
although I don't want them to look posed.
If you do
Yeah, I believe it. I think if I took a ride up into Michigan Militia
territory, I can find something nastier. But I didn't want to make this
too much work:-).
Paul
On Mar 3, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
It was taken in Pontiac, Michigan. It was the only
Paul Stenquist wrote:
That's exactly where we bought them -- Salvation Army. Right down the
street from the TP.
You've got better Salvation Army stores than we do, too. :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
1 - 100 of 244 matches
Mail list logo
