On Monday, Oct 20, 2003, at 16:16 America/New_York, Pat White wrote:
Who knows what films will
be out in five years? Medium-grained 3200-speed, ultrafine-grained
400-speed? I'm keeping my film cameras.
My guess is that by that time, they'll have figured out how to imprint
an array of sensors on
On Monday, Oct 20, 2003, at 23:02 America/New_York, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, William Robb wrote:
From: "Pat White"
As film sales volumes go down, there will be less incentive for
companies to
put R&D money into the medium, especially when they need to be
putting it
into se
- Original Message -
From: "Pat White"
Subject: film vs digital (was *ist D makes me cringe (was Pentax 6x7 in the
rain))
> Who knows what films will
> be out in five years? Medium-grained 3200-speed, ultrafine-grained
> 400-speed? I'm keeping my film came
Good for you!
Jim A.
> From: Pat White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:16:24 -0700
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: film vs digital (was *ist D makes me cringe (was Pentax 6x7 in the
> rain))
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTEC
> That's one thing that's very cool about film cameras: you "upgrade the
> sensor" by using an improved film, which is why my 30-year-old 6x7 is able
> to produce state-of-the-art, 2003, 160Mb images. Who knows what films
will
> be out in five years? Medium-grained 3200-speed, ultrafine-grained
Steve Desjardins wrote:
I think this "obsolete next year" is more of a mentality than a
technological issue as long as the images are satifactory in the first
place, which I think 6MP is. OTOH, there's no question in my mind that
these *ist D's won't be around as long as any film body. 10 years?
6 matches
Mail list logo
