Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: which one to choose?
> Hi Kathy,
>
> So, you're buying a camera without ever having seen or tried it.
> Frankly, you're doing yourself a disservice.
>She already bought the camera, and was asking for advise on using it,
>not whether she made a good decision.
He's angry because she chose the Z-1p over the mighty LX. :)
regards,
Alan Chan
_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share
From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Well, there is no Santa ... This business about "enabling" everybody
> is ridiculous.
She already bought the camera, and was asking for advise on using it,
not whether she made a good decision.
tv
--
Thomas Van Veen Photography
301-758-3
Well, there is no Santa ... This business about "enabling" everybody is
ridiculous. While there may be some valid reasons for some people to
make a long term investment in a camera without ever having seen one, in
general I believe it's a piss poor idea. For starters, the camera is big
and bulky,
From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi Kathy,
>
> So, you're buying a camera without ever having seen or tried it.
> Frankly, you're doing yourself a disservice.
Geez Shel, why don't you just pee in her coffee and tell her there's
no Santa while you're at it? ;)
Kathy...the
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> So, you're buying a camera without ever having seen or tried it.
> Frankly, you're doing yourself a disservice. How do you know it'll be
That may not entirely be her fault, however.
When I decided to relegate my ZX-50 to backup status, and buy a new
Hi Kathy,
So, you're buying a camera without ever having seen or tried it.
Frankly, you're doing yourself a disservice. How do you know it'll be
comfortable to hold or easy to use, or even that it will suit you? Just
because the specs look good, or some people on the list have suggested
that
Alan wrote:
>I think the strength of MZ-S is excellent built quality with reasonable
>amount of features. Don't get the wrong idea that "high-end" must mean more
>features. The amount of features is just one aspect of a good camera.
But the bloody fact remain that the MZ-S has MORE features th
non Rebel is that
PL> it would make a great ashtray, if you take off the lens.
PL> We shouldn't be making these kind of comparisons.
PL> Len
PL> ---
PL> -Original Message-
PL> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
PL> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1
Regards,
Robert
Proud owner of a PZ1-p, ZX5n, ME Super, Super Program, K1000, FT2, and
son an LX. MZ-S in a couple of months, oops I mean years honey.
Medium format? Hm.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2
el is that
it would make a great ashtray, if you take off the lens.
We shouldn't be making these kind of comparisons.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: which one to
Honest opinion - is YOU dont see some feature the MZ-S has that you
want/need that the PZ-1p doesn't,
dont blow the extra money!
Not sure if data-imprinting is worth that much extra!
At 12:20 PM 1/31/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: which one to choose?
>
Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On paper, the PZ-1p looks formidable. It has a large number of
> features and high end specifications. Remember though, that a Canon
> Rebel also looks good on paper.
Ouch!
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Francis,
Comparing these two bodies is quite a task. I used to own 2 PZ-1p's
and used them extensively. I now own 2 MZ-S's so feel I might be able
to do the comparison justice.
On paper, the PZ-1p looks formidable. It has a large number of
features and high end specifications. Remember thoug
14 matches
Mail list logo
