Don't worry Cotty, at least your Mac is consistent within itself. I use
Photoshop LE (precursor to Elements) which is preset to Mac gamma.
There is nowhere to change the gamma setting.
So I get a picture looking good in Photoshop in Windows, then I open it
in Internet Explorer (or as a
Instead od M100/2.8 try to find K105/2.8, it is allegedly much better lens ( I own
it-very nice)
Alek
Uytkownik Ken Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
I just bought a M 100/2.8 on your advice. I don't need a macro, but I
did need a 100/105 lens for field portraits of handlers with their
dogs.
Thanks for the replies
I wrote to Japan in September and have not had any reply. The address I used
was
The Director
Service Department (International)
Asahi Optical Co. ltd
11-1, Nagata-cho 1-chome
Chiyoda-ku
Tokyo 100
Japan
Maybe anyone knows a better address?
I wrote to amateur photographer
Don't you just love that!
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:46 AM
Subject: Re: Re[6]: electra studio flash/ring flash
On Sunday, December 8, 2002, at 02:09 PM, Feroze
Hi Alek,
on 09 Dec 02 you wrote in pentax.list:
Instead od M100/2.8 try to find K105/2.8, it is allegedly much better lens (
I own it-very nice) Alek
Not necessarily. I've owned both M100 and K105 and found the M100 better
(sharper, more contrast, lighter). So I've sold the K105 and kept the
But in Yoshihiko test there is small difference and when I asked him about these
lenses he recommended K ones, K35/3.5 and K35/2.0, according to him much better!
And new FA35/2.0 is probably very good lens.
Alek
Uytkownik Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
I find this a bit weird as I
on 09.12.02 7:23, Michel Carr?re-Ge at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MZ-S is very, very nice camera, the only bad point is the ??$-?#]?%
selector for the AF point !
You can read French MZ-S review:
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/Photo/mz-s.htm
And others: BG-10,
ping
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Dave,
Surely you change the monitor gamma setting in the OS and not the
application??
Cotty
not in Windows. that is why it is so complicated. the OS itself doesn't
care and doesn't use anything. the video card device driver can be
Pong.
Bob Rapp wrote:
ping
Hi,
Annsann wrote:
Has anyone every pointed out (of course someone has) that free
gift is redundant? However, in this case I'm pretty skeptical
that it is free. Best case scenario, you add yourself to a list
and get spam.
My dry sense of humour to the fore, I'm afraid. It was _meant_
to be a
Better still, If I get any spam you can give them to me!
-Original Message-
From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 December 2002 11:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Free gift!!
Hi,
Annsann wrote:
Has anyone every pointed out (of course someone has) that
Hi friends,
after the two months or so, I am back and fortunately, in fine
health. I won't have enough time to be subscribed to the list and
participate as I did, so I will just sub and unsub (hop on, hop
off) from time to time. Probably more time off, especially with all
the guns
Hi friends,
I have this ME-Super which I bought from Boz to compliment the LX
as a stealth camera (compared to the LX it certainly is!), and as
one which I can literarily bang around in any bag.
I would like the camera to be smaller and more streamlined, and
easier to hold. I have
Hi friends,
I have a friend who is most probably going to Japan early
next year, and I thought of asking him to look for the new LX
screens there, buying few for me (and maybe I could pass few to
others if interested).
Our Japanese members (and others of course), would you please
Hey folks,
I have a question. I get totally lost when it comes to EV, well, not the
basic usage, but let me tell you what I want. I've got Kodak P3200 film
here, now I can set the ISO to 6400 to have it push-processed. Is that as
far as I can take it or can I push it further using the EV dial,
ISO100+3EV = 800. The equation is: 100 x 2 x 2 x 2
Perhaps ISO3200+3EV = 25600?
regards,
Alan Chan
I have a question. I get totally lost when it comes to EV, well, not the
basic usage, but let me tell you what I want. I've got Kodak P3200 film
here, now I can set the ISO to 6400 to have it
Brad,
AFAIK, if you have a hand meter, and the MZ-S has a fully manual mode (i.e.
shutter speed and aperture) then you can push that film to 12,800 or 25,000
or anywhere in between.
The meter of course would have to be able to go to those ASA/ISO values (or
you can calculate them by
Major upset to see that luminous landscape is down due to abuse
(although they no longer state the reason on the banner page). What
abuse was this, and how serious was it? Will they be back soon?
Anyway, glad that we had the links to Mike J's other host for his Sunday
stuff listed on here
on 09.12.02 12:50, Frantisek Vlcek at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome back Frantisek!
Glad to see you in good health again! I hope we will see your photo-work
anytime soon on the net. Let us know ;-)
Hi friends,
after the two months or so, I am back and fortunately, in fine
health. I won't
Dan wrote:
Are the FA 645 lenses compatible with the pre-autofocus 645 like the
35mm FA lenses are with 35mm manual bodies?
Yes. Everything will work except AF (of course).
Pål
Andre wrote:
I have heard that the 120mm macro has bad bokeh. Is is true?
(I have the lens but not the means to use it for the moment.)
YES! It is a wonderful sharp and contrasty lens with terrible bokeh. I have several
images destined for the bin as the background is simply too ugly and
I never really noticed it before Dan but i think your correct.The
gallery has not been updated for a while.I have recently(ie
this year)bought the smc m 135 f 3.5 and smc m 150 f3.5 and smc a 70-
210 f4.Maybe during my Christmas vacation I'll shoot a subject
with all 3 and submit.
Dave
Ok, set the camera up, set the 6400ISO and then turned the dial EV+3. It
should be very sensitive no? I get low shutter speeds on Tv, but when I
turn to EV-3, even in a darkened room the Tv sky-rockets.
Is this right? I should still go EV+3 but use it at 'M'? No...then I
couldn't meter
Hi, Frantisek,
Nice to see you back!
cheers,
frank
Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
Hi friends,
after the two months or so, I am back and fortunately, in fine
health. I won't have enough time to be subscribed to the list and
participate as I did, so I will just sub and unsub (hop on, hop
I think it should be ISO3200, -3EV compensation.
If you set ISO6400, - 3EV, it would be 4 stops above, not 3.
If you set ISO6400, + 3EV, it would be 2 stops above.
regards,
Alan Chan
Ok, set the camera up, set the 6400ISO and then turned the dial EV+3. It
should be very sensitive no? I get
No problem here either Collin.It was better you showed up
Sunday anyway.Bloor Street at 3:30 was bumper to bumper
when i TRIED to get homeg
Hope you were not honked at to much:)
I put a roll of Delta 3200 in the Y-M for inside but wound
up shooting some stealth scapes on the way and at the
Hi!
I really doubt that Pentax __should__ create their own CCD or other
kind of sensor. I mean why? What would be the reason for doing so?
They could use any of the existing technologies. Yes, this would mean
some fees (royalties) and probably some price impact on consumer. But
to create one's
Hi!
In my personal humble opinion the question of fate of film is more of
philosophical than of practical nature. You see, I don't think that
any of us, even if there are people here that work for photo
companies, such as Pentax itself, can reasonably well predict what
will happen in the
Frank,
Comments [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) I want to remove the hotshoe, as it just catches on any clothing
easily, making removing the camera from a pocket slower. It's all
contact mounted, so no loose wires to cut. However, I will have to
make a a square metal cap with holes
Hi,
Interesting. According too many users K105 is much better.Maybe you had bad lens,
difficult to say.
Even on Stan Halpin's site most people prefer old K lens.
Alek
ytkownik Heiko Hamann [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Hi Alek,
on 09 Dec 02 you wrote in pentax.list:
Instead od M100/2.8 try to
On 9 Dec 2002 at 15:17, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
In my personal humble opinion the question of fate of film is more of
philosophical than of practical nature.
Hi Boris,
Sorry to cut your well presented argument short but it could be as simple as
the introduction of governmental EPA
On 9 Dec 2002 at 15:17, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
I really doubt that Pentax __should__ create their own CCD or other
kind of sensor. I mean why?
... I'd
rather they create some interesting lenses and write some excellent
firmware for their DSLR.
Apart from creating some new desirable
Hi akozak,
on 09 Dec 02 you wrote in pentax.list:
Interesting. According too many users K105 is much better.Maybe you had
bad lens, difficult to say. Even on Stan Halpin's site most people
prefer old K lens. Alek
Yes, I had read that before buying the lenses and I was very surprised,
also. It
-Original Message-
From: Andre Langevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pentax 645 portraits: 150mm or 200mm?
I have heard that the 120mm macro has bad bokeh. Is is true?
The bokeh doesn't seem so bad, but it's
On 9 Dec 2002 at 8:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should look at the grip on the Super Program/Super A.
It is much smaller than the LX grip, and mounts with a screw on.
It is complemented by a thumb grip area on the back door.
Otherwise, you are going to end up with a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Kodak Tmax 3200 should be able to be pushed as far as 25,000 IIRC.
Remember though that you're going to lose shadow detail as
you go higher
than the 3200.
It loses shadow detail over 1600.
tv
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Dan Scott wrote:
Are the FA 645 lenses compatible with the pre-autofocus 645 like the
35mm FA lenses are with 35mm manual bodies?
Yes.
--
http://www.infotainment.org - more fun than a poke in your eye.
http://www.eighteenpercent.com- photography and
This month's edition of the Rotaria, the English-language magazine of
Rotary International, contains a group of black-and-white photographs by
Sebastiao Salgado documenting the campaign to eradicate polio in the few
third world nations where it still impacts many lifes.
The article note that
Hi Frantisek
I'm glad to see you're well and alive and congratulations on your
exhibition! Hope Prague has recovered as well.
Servus, Alin
Frantisek wrote:
FVafter the two months or so, I am back and fortunately, in fine
FVhealth. I won't have enough time to be
Ahh Windows 95 and up ships with Kodak Professional Color Management. In
98 and up it is integrated into the system. Of course you have to set it up
to your card and monitor. If you are using a Mac they presume you are using
their card and monitor, Windows can not do that. You probably will
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong
Subject: Re: Displaying images on the web
. something like Adobe Gamma should have been part of
the OS. that is why there are only a handful of image editing
programs that
can be used for serious photographic manipulation in Windows.
they are the
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ahh Windows 95 and up ships with Kodak Professional Color Management.
In
98 and up it is integrated into the system.
integrated means that all applications know where to look for it, not that
anything in the system uses it. try changing color
What is this firmware?
Jim A.
From: Brad Dobo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 00:48:45 -0500
To: PDML \(Pentax\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Optio 230 Firmware question
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 00:48:08 -0500
Hey
The only other thing I can draw is gorillas. Will they do?
Good man.
Dan Scott
Here you are then. My apologies in advance.
http://www.morphet.org.uk/gorillas.gif
Steve.
Didn't get any time to shoot the old ship along the shore line.
But that's on my list for next time. (It's an old wood vessel that
would have been used 300 years ago.) It's in the vicinity of
St. Catharines.
The one you see from the QEW? I think that's a tourist trap.
--
Steve
[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Cesar Matamoros II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
This is something I have always talked about with people in
terms of digital
photography. You are now the developer. And with the talk
of archiving,
double and triple archiving is the means to minimize
On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 06:19 AM, Rob Brigham wrote:
I am not sure I totally agree with the paragraph:
Any kind of specialist photographer will immediately recoil from the
suggestion that photographers could benefit from having only one or two
lenses. Lenses can allow access - to tiny
This is an interesting argument. In addition, you could easily conceive
of airport security making film impractical for travel. Although they
will have to make some accommodation for electronic storage devices
these days, I could easily see them saying this will damage film -
sorry for random
On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 08:37 AM, Cotty wrote:
Great Scott. Talk about making things difficult! I had no idea.
Thanks Herb.
Cotty
Yeah.
We have it good. The impulse to adapt your images to their systems
shows you are a caring and compassionate man. However, your noble act
of
On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 08:14 AM, Steve Morphet wrote:
Here you are then. My apologies in advance.
http://www.morphet.org.uk/gorillas.gif
Steve.
Much better. But--where do you plug the cable in?
Dan Scott
Hello,
I think it was discussed, but I don't have so old archives :-( Anyway - the
question: is it possible to mount and use Mir 20/2.5 with original K-mount
with newer AF bodies (MZ-S)? I've heard that there are some problems,
because this lens reaches to far in the mirror box. Can anyone confirm
According to www.pdml.net the acronym is
Parsing Damned Minutiae Loudly.
Jostein
= Original Message From Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] =
On Sunday, December 8, 2002, at 06:06 PM, Norm Baugher wrote:
Pistols, Desert eagle, Mauser, Luger???
Pentax anyone?
Norm
(kinda partial to the
-Original Message-
From: Dan Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
This pure speculation on my part, but I suspect that there
are amateurs
and there are amateurs. Probably the greatest percentage of, say, slr
type amateurs are those who buy a kit consisting of an entry
level slr
- Original Message -
From: Steve Desjardins
Subject: Re: Interesting read
This is an interesting argument. In addition, you could
easily conceive
of airport security making film impractical for travel.
Although they
will have to make some accommodation for electronic storage
devices
On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 12:40 AM, William Johnson wrote:
Well, there are some good samples here. I think this has been
posted here before, or perhaps I found it searching the web a while
back:
http://www.pentax-fan.jp/photo/lenslist.asp
Main site here:
Hi,
Boris wrote:
They predict that in few years you would be able to run your
laptop for 10 hours straight and all you'd need do to recharge it
would be to replace a small container with some fluid that would be
sold for few pennies everywhere...
And 50 years ago, in the UK, they said that
On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 01:20 AM, Anthony Farr wrote:
Gary,
Could you point me to
Could y'all please take this off list? I'm sure quite a few of us would
appreciate it.
Thanks,
Dan Scott
Brad Dobo wrote:
Ok, set the camera up, set the 6400ISO and then turned the dial EV+3.
to push you'd set at a - EV ; + EV is a pull
Don't know about newer bodies, but w/ my old ProgramSeries you
can't adjust -EV from the fastest ISO setting, as it is a
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is an interesting argument. In addition, you could easily conceive
of airport security making film impractical for travel. Although they
will have to make some accommodation for electronic storage devices
these days, I could easily see them
-- -Original Message-
-- From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
-- Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 10:24 AM
--
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Cesar Matamoros II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
--
-- This is something I have always talked about with people in
-- terms of digital
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Herb.
Just to make sure I have this straight:
So the default operation once I have set up my monitors using
Gamma is to use the colour settings that I have saved?
Thanks again
William Robb
yes, that is all. if you by some chance have a
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
however, that is tying you into a specific
vendor's driver settings. the big trick for most people to use Adobe Gamma
properly is to find a color profile or the phosphor settings to use with
the monitor.
Herb
i should clarify that i mean an
On 12/9/02 8:07 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Boris wrote:
They predict that in few years you would be able to run your
laptop for 10 hours straight and all you'd need do to recharge it
would be to replace a small container with some fluid that would be
sold for few pennies everywhere...
And 50
Hanimex used to make a 300mm mirror telephoto lens in screw mount. it
wasn't a very expensive one, but it worked OK. are there any 300mm reflex
lenses out there for K-mount that aren't too expensive? i wouldn't use the
FA* 300 f4.5 to justify the cost of buying one.
Herb...
Comments below, where appropriate:
Ryan K. Brooks wrote:
Boris Liberman wrote:
Take DVD and VHS for example. If you were a video professional, you
might want to put your latest and greatest on DVD. For home use (such
as recording some repeating program that happens to be broadcast in
I had the Hanimex 300mm f5.6 mirror (k-mount) for a short while. It cost
me about 50 Euros. I tested it against the FA*300/f4.5 and a Revuenon
300mm f5.6. The flare of the Hanimex mirror was horrible and made it
almost unusable. I can even send some bw scans, but that would take a
while
CBWaters wrote:
Ok...
First, I don't think your flash fired as the first and third uh, gorilla,
look the same.
Nope. The third gorilla is all squinty-eyed from the flash going off! g
keith whaley
Second, How the hell is that a gorilla?
Cory
I thought I just wouldn't ask.
hAt one
That's the one. I thought it a reproduction as well,
like the one here in Columbus, OH. But at least ours is in the water!
BTW, What does QEW stand for?
Collin
*
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 10:06:47 -0500
From: Steve Sharpe [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong
Subject: Re: Displaying images on the web
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
however, that is tying you into a specific
vendor's driver settings. the big trick for most people to use
Adobe Gamma
properly is to find a color
Hanimex used to make a 300mm mirror telephoto lens in screw mount. it
wasn't a very expensive one, but it worked OK. are there any 300mm reflex
lenses out there for K-mount that aren't too expensive?
Herb.
Seek out the Sigma 300mm F4.5 Apo (from probably the 80s I suppose) or the
Tamron
Official Welcome.
I liked your pics, especially your PUG submission. Your artistic
experience is probably more valuable than any technical knowledge you
lack. This list is really helpful in that regard. Otherwise, enjoy the
K1000. I have a similar older screwhead camera the SP500 that is 30
Does any one know where I can get a replacement battery compartment cover for
my LX? (There's one on the ground somewhere in the Bronx Zoo, but I've
already looked and can't find that one. At least the day was not ruined,
because the LX still worked).
Thanks for your help.
Steve
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seek out the Sigma 300mm F4.5 Apo (from probably the 80s I suppose) or the
Tamron SP 350mm F5.6 Cat. Sig for preference - a stoutly built number with
APO glass.
Kind regards
Peter
OK, thanks. i need adequate quality glass, at least for now.
Herb Chong wrote:
OK, thanks. i need adequate quality glass, at least for now. any idea what
the going rate is for one in good condition?
I have an SMCP 400mm f5.6 which I could be persuaded to
part with if you are looking for a quality long lens for
a reasonable cost.
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CBWaters wrote:
Ok...
First, I don't think your flash fired as the first and third uh,
gorilla,
look the same.
Nope. The third gorilla is all squinty-eyed from the flash going off! g
keith whaley
Ahhh, didn't
From:
Year Book Australia 2002
Crime and Justice
Crimes recorded by police
http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/ABS%40.nsf/94713ad445ff1425ca25682000192af2/0
8238ef609c9178eca256b35001967d0!OpenDocument
Figures are rate per 100,000 population.
Figures in paren are percent change from year 1996.
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have an SMCP 400mm f5.6 which I could be persuaded to
part with if you are looking for a quality long lens for
a reasonable cost. Contact me off-list if you like.
Bill
want reflex for weight and size reasons.
Aren't LX's great like that.
Try Pentax in Colorado, if you call their 800 number they have a parts
department selection, I'm sure that's one they will have.
Geoff
Does any one know where I can get a replacement battery compartment cover for
my LX? (There's one on the ground somewhere in
Herb,
I tend to carry my FA * 200/2.8 + 1.4X-L converter. Gives me 300mm
reach and the weight/size is not that bad. That is one of the reasons
I would consider selling my A 400/5.6. Just a thought.
Bruce
Monday, December 9, 2002, 11:25:07 AM, you wrote:
HC Message text written by
Hi,
Monday, December 9, 2002, 12:19:15 PM, you wrote:
I am not sure I totally agree with the paragraph:
Any kind of specialist photographer will immediately recoil from the
suggestion that photographers could benefit from having only one or two
lenses. Lenses can allow access - to tiny
Ann, I would love to get one of these for my office. Be sure to let us know
when it's available.
Evan
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: My December photo project for fun and hopefully profit
My mini-ad can be seen at :
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Herb,
I tend to carry my FA * 200/2.8 + 1.4X-L converter. Gives me 300mm
reach and the weight/size is not that bad. That is one of the reasons
I would consider selling my A 400/5.6. Just a thought.
Bruce
i'm thinking of a used converter
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Bob Walkden wrote:
I think the point is that there aren't many lenses for RF Leicas (and
presumably view cameras).
There's lots and lots of view camera lenses, I just think they tend to
realize they only need one or two and learn how to make their vision and
lens selection
--- Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, What does QEW stand for?
Collin-
QEW = Queen's Expressway. The standard MPH to km per hr conversion always gets
to me on a trip north of the border as well. The eyes see 100km/h and the brain
goes Whoa when it only roughly translates to
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's lots and lots of view camera lenses, I just think they tend to
realize they only need one or two and learn how to make their vision and
lens selection match, rather than throwing tons of equipment at the
photograph.
there is carrying
CBWaters wrote:
Ok...
First, I don't think your flash fired as the first and third uh, gorilla,
look the same.
Nope. The third gorilla is all squinty-eyed from the flash going off! g
keith whaley
Second, How the hell is that a gorilla?
Cory
I thought I just wouldn't ask.
hAt one time
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Herb Chong wrote:
Just so you know, I'm supporting minimal kits.. ;)
there is carrying them too, and changing lenses is a complicated affair. a
I don't have much experience here, however, changing lenses isn't that
difficult. Slide out a tab at the top, at the bottom,
In a message dated 12/9/2002 3:52:28 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay okay, I've risen to the challenge. For an everyday
tale of gorillas
and cameras, look at:
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/mods/gorillas.html
:-)
Cotty
Cute. Makes me wonder how you'd draw
I'm not trying to win any awards for this purpose, just enough to see a
'problem' @ night.
- Original Message -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 8:46 AM
Subject: RE: Pushing the limits of film and the camera settings
-Original
Has heard anything about this film scanner, the Smartscan 3600? 3600
dpi film scanner, scans strips without a carrier?
Searching google doesn't yield much other than price and the
manufacturer's spiel.
For anyone considering the Epson 2450, it seem to have reached the US
$350 area (online
On 9 Dec 2002 at 15:36, Herb Chong wrote:
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's lots and lots of view camera lenses, I just think they tend to
realize they only need one or two and learn how to make their vision and
lens selection match, rather than throwing tons of
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/calendar4adonweb.jpg
better layout --
using matte heavyweight - as Dan suggested. but glossy for the cover.
So any of you guys game for joining the where in the USA was ann
sanfedele?
what, pictures too small?
2 points for each correct locale, 1 point for correct
I don't know how true this is, but... I have heard that the new High power
x-ray machines used for checked luggage can fry electronic devices.
At 10:24 AM 12/9/2002 -0500, you wrote:
This is an interesting argument. In addition, you could easily conceive
of airport security making film
A contest? What's the prize, Ann?
A free gift? vbg
regards,
frank
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/calendar4adonweb.jpg
better layout --
using matte heavyweight - as Dan suggested. but glossy for the cover.
So any of you guys game for joining the where in the USA was
BTW, happy birthday, Ann!!
frank theriault wrote:
A contest? What's the prize, Ann?
A free gift? vbg
--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert
Oppenheimer
Actually, QEW is short for Queen Elizabeth Way. You're right about speeds
in California. Last summer I drove to California, and typical speeds on I-5
were 75-90 mph, but almost no-one travelled any faster. Have you driven in
Europe?
Pat White
Monday, December 9, 2002, 3:44:18 PM, Cotty wrote:
C Jees, all this wonderful talk about drilling here, unscrewing there -
C makes me wanna go out and start . well, doing things! I wonder if
C I can knock together a film back for the D60?
sounds interesting, although probably quite a
Monday, December 9, 2002, 3:39:29 PM, Cotty wrote:
C Hi Frants,
C Welcome back. Where is your exhibition showing?
C Cotty
Hi Cotty, master of Pentax mods :)
In Prague, of course :) You don't plan on visiting don't you - that
would be wonderful indeed!
I will put up some of the better images
RS There isn't any threaded recess designed to accommodate a grip on the ME Super,
RS you'd have to either end up adding a Winder or a base grip attached to the
RS tripod thread as shown here:
RS http://members28.cool.ne.jp/~khmhk/Tool/rgrip.html
Hi Rob,
thanks for the link. That's something
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
