Thanksfor your help Marco,
sound like the perfect pastime for the Easter holidays!!
Peter
On Mar 15, 2005, at 11:07 PM, Peter Smekal wrote:
Hhhmmm ... how did you get registered? ... just curious
Persistence. For those interested in actually registering and bidding,
the following may be of
Rob Studdert wrote on 16.03.05 1:32:
I predict that if and when Pentax actually get a D645 body to market Canon
will
before if not very soon after release a full frame 18MP body at a very
attractive price point which will be near half the price point of the Pentax
D645. In the interim
Well, that tortuous loop has come to its end. I just had to try once
more. And that did it, now it works as it should. I am not quite sure
what was it that i made differently, but on that last disassembly i
fiddled with the focusing helicoid and it´s bronze coloured counterpart...
Thanks for
From the recent Ebay activity, the 2 lenses you want to sell may fetch
a pretty good price... :)
Personally, really don't like the flare control of Sigma lenses...
Cheers
Andy
Thibouille said:
I saw:
A sigma 70-210 at 70 euros and a 100-300 at 95 euros in a shop. Of
course these are probably DC
--- Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know about this particular lens but if you removed the aperture mech
from the lens body for immersion cleaning then you need to make sure that it
was returned and secured in precisely the same position. If the aperture mech
is rotated to a
So that's what Fred's up to :-)
Dave S
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:54:36 +, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Wednesday, March 16, 2005, 2:38:32 AM, Fred wrote:
The discussion regarding who would buy the new D645 made me wonder how
much you folk spend on your career/hobby/addiction.
--- Niko Koskela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, that tortuous loop has come to its end. I just had to try once
more. And that did it, now it works as it should. I am not quite sure
what was it that i made differently, but on that last disassembly i
fiddled with the focusing helicoid and
fra: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rob Studdert wrote on 16.03.05 1:32:
I predict that if and when Pentax actually get a D645 body to market Canon
will
before if not very soon after release a full frame 18MP body at a very
attractive price point which will be near half the
On Mar 15, 2005, at 1:49 PM, pancho hasselbach wrote:
I just came across an offer for an K 3.5/24. Has anybody compared it
directly to the A 2.8/24? I own the latter, and I think that, apart
from it's other qualities, it tends to a slight barrel distortion.
Unfortunately, someone on Stan's site
Frantisek wrote on 16.03.05 0:52:
I wonder about the extra large sensor and only 18.6 MP. It could
mean the noise would be well controled, perhaps quite better than the
22MP backs so far.
Let's hope it will be better than Kodak's CMOS sensor used in DCS-14x
models. It wasn't too good
Francis,
We have a lovely bouquet of apricot blossoms in our kitchen right now.
http://www.photosynth.ca/photo/f/apricot-blossoms.html
Taken with Kodak ps while shining a blue LED flash light at it.
cool idea that blue LED lighting. On my display they do look somewhat
dark but nothing too
The larger sensor (38x50mm?) has pixels almost twice as big (in
area) and should have better signal to noise performance than 1 DS2,
and that will put 645d in different league and command a higher
price. That is, if Kodak does its homework.
Otherwise, sadly the 35 mm full frame from
On Mar 15, 2005, at 12:09 PM, Joe Wilensky wrote:
We're in the process of purchasing the minivan our growing family
needs, and, as the purchase is coming a bit earlier than planned, it
would really help to have a little extra cash around. So although I am
enjoying my second brief ownership of
Macs consider that history began on 1 January 1904, whereas Windows thinks
it began on 1 January 1900. That explains why your Mac is saying
31/12/03. There is no date recorded in the field, and rather than display
nothing, the Mac goes back to the dawn of time.
John
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005
Slim pickin's this week: I'm in the midst of packing up stuff for
moving, fixing all the vehicles and getting them ready for the move,
etc. I liked the light on this people shot, though...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/12.htm
comments always appreciated.
Godfrey
On 16/3/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
PS How do you pronounce *ist?
Rhymes with 'heist' ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Quoting Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hmm, This latest PENTAX digital advancement will be showcased under glass,
hopefully it will stay there just like the MZ-D did.
After the MZ-D, I'd be surprised if they dare repeating that blunder.
OTOH, I don't think this camera will be on the usual
On 15/3/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Not Easter weekend, but still, I'm happy. Actually, this is good,
because I can spend Easter with my two younger kids, then two weeks
later visit my eldest. I think it's better this way.
I just thought I'd share...
Good news Frank -
Frank,
As an example, here's a PESO from a while back. No time for
viewfinders or two hands on the camera. My youngest, Claire, sucking
on a Warhead, a candy that's excruciatingly sour for about 15
seconds, then turns sweet:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2349851
this one is really
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Wednesday, March 16, 2005, 2:38:32 AM, Fred wrote:
The discussion regarding who would buy the new D645 made me wonder how
much you folk spend on your career/hobby/addiction.
People might want to think twice about publishing the value of their
Eac Egad, what a horrible idea.
Eac I also notice you volunteered someone else's D/DS. ;-)
;-)
I would offer my DSLR in a heartbeat, bu you see, it's a Nikon, that
test would be meaningless... I am so sorry ;-)
Good light!
fra
On Mar 14, 2005, at 4:02 PM, frank theriault wrote:
...and your hands upon the wheel:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3196973size=lg
Nice, although it would be better for me if I didn't have this sense of
imminent disaster since he isn't looking where he's going... ;-)
Godfrey
On 16/3/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm guessing it will be much less. The digital market is still evolving.
To be successful, Pentax will have to price under the Canon 1DS Mark II.
I think they'll find a way to do it.
Perhaps by using lots of plastic. There is a reason
JF I think you'll find that's a FA-J 18-55.
Oops/
JF There is some speculation on the dpreview forums that this lens is
JF a variant of the Tokina 12-24 (presumably with Pentax SMC add-ons).
Hm. I somewhat doubt it, but speculation is endless...
I have tested the Tokina, and it is as most
On Mar 14, 2005, at 4:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the modern Leica ultrawides are retrofocus design anyway, like
the Elmarit-M 21 and 24mm lenses.
Hello Godfrey,
fancy meeting you here :-)
Photographers and equipment junkies float on the same waters... ;-)
I didn't know that about the
On 15/3/05, Don Sanderson, discombobulated, unleashed:
To get an idea of it's size and 'beefy-ness'
here it is with Bogen 3001 legs and the ist-D:
http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/Grip.jpg
I can see the brake, but where's the throttle??
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
The discussion regarding who would buy the new D645 made me wonder
how much you folk spend on your career/hobby/addiction.
Obviously not enough because I'm still looking for stuff :)
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Fred Widall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
On Mar 15, 2005, at 10:44 PM, William Robb wrote:
If they go the 645 route for their pro line digital cameras, it
would be consistent with the company's strategy of
35mm for amateurs, medium format for professionals.
I don't necessarily see that as a minus for advanced amateurs or
part-time
Make sure you have fresh batteries in the camera. I've experienced a
wide range of odd behavior with low voltage batteries.
Paul
On Mar 15, 2005, at 10:58 PM, Tan and Steve wrote:
Well, she's given up the ghost! My poor baby is off to the shop after
17,000 or so frames cause her aperture
And now at last it comes. (...) In place of the Dark Lord you will
set up a Queen. And I shall not be dark, but beautiful and terrible as
the Morning and the Night! Fair as the Sea and the Sun and the Snow
upon the Mountain! Dreadful as the Storm and the Lightning! Stronger
than the foundations of
8x10 2-D
12 Ilex
210/5.6 Fujinon
4x5 Nagaoka
135 Ysarex
90/8 Ilex
Super Program
Winder
MX
Winder
A70-210/4
A100/2.8
FA50/1.4
A50/1.7
A35/2
K30/2.8
$1800
The K 24/3.5 is very sharp and contrasty. Barrel distortion seems
minimal for that wide a lens, but I haven't compared it to the A24/2.8.
Paul
On Mar 16, 2005, at 4:00 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Mar 15, 2005, at 1:49 PM, pancho hasselbach wrote:
I just came across an offer for an K 3.5/24.
The 20D isn't full frame. And based on the results I've seen, it's no
better than the *istD, perhaps not as good.
On Mar 16, 2005, at 4:06 AM, Alin Flaider wrote:
The larger sensor (38x50mm?) has pixels almost twice as big (in
area) and should have better signal to noise performance than 1
It's not a matter of materials. It's more about the evolution of the
technology and the reduced cost of components. Whatever sensor Pentax
is using, you can be fairly certain they have a deep pocket, heavy user
partner. I'll bet we hear more about this shortly.
Paul
On Mar 16, 2005, at 5:04
share Rob's scepticism. Although, I am not a sceptic. I just laughed
at all the threads on dpreview about D2X vs 1DSII.
SP Both are great cameras. I wish Pentax could produce *istD succesor with
SP 12MPix sensor as used in D2X. And AF performance at level of D2X would be
SP nice too ;-)
I meant
20D is no full frame but at least sits on a full frame path.
Servus, Alin
Paul wrote:
PS The 20D isn't full frame. And based on the results I've seen, it's no
PS better than the *istD, perhaps not as good.
PS On Mar 16, 2005, at 4:06 AM, Alin Flaider wrote:
The larger sensor
it would replace my Sigma 12-24, which i don't like a lot, but it functions
well enough to be useable. i expect optics on the Pentax to be comparable to
the 16-45 and no worse than the 14.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday,
Frantisek wrote on 16.03.05 12:20:
I meant I laughed at the constant quarrels between people there on DPREVIEW...
Oh yes, that's true. Neverending, pointless quarrels. Just like a small
children, who often like to quarrel with friends who has the best toy :-)
If the price you mention is near
I believe at least one of these was taken in Romania. :o(
Do I see the an incipient essay? ;o)
Servus, Alin
Bob wrote:
BW http://www.web-options.com/manoftheyearawards.htm
Alin Flaider wrote on 16.03.05 12:42:
I believe at least one of these was taken in Romania. :o(
I have been several times in Romania and never seen these men ;-)
Do I see the an incipient essay? ;o)
No, I bet it is closed now ;-)
--
Pozdrowienia
Sylwek
On 16 Mar 2005 at 6:22, Paul Stenquist wrote:
It's not a matter of materials. It's more about the evolution of the
technology and the reduced cost of components. Whatever sensor Pentax
is using, you can be fairly certain they have a deep pocket, heavy user
partner. I'll bet we hear more
On 16/3/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's not a matter of materials. It's more about the evolution of the
technology and the reduced cost of components. Whatever sensor Pentax
is using, you can be fairly certain they have a deep pocket, heavy user
partner. I'll bet we hear
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~pentaxmx/6x7/
I learned the hard way that early 6x7s can't be repaired. The one on the
right is the early version (mk 1?) with the checker spool release while
the left hand one is the later style, still without MLU.
The finders are equally beaten up and I
Hi all,
I am taking my wife to Ney Work city for a birthday weekend in June and it
seems a good opportunity to buy some additional odds and ends for my Pentax
*ist D. I could do with some prime lenses and a battery grip. I am also
thinking of something to bounce a little light off. (I am a bit
Seek help.
g
Dave S
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:13:16 +0200, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And now at last it comes. (...) In place of the Dark Lord you will
set up a Queen. And I shall not be dark, but beautiful and terrible as
the Morning and the Night! Fair as the Sea and
Quoting John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Looks like a Mac and/or Photoshop problem.
Hmmm...
I just used the Windows Explorer and added some custom fields to the Details
view. One field called image created date shows nothing. I agree with you
about the interpretation of the file created date,
Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think this camera will be on the usual assembly line. According to
my local Pentax person (I was not allowed to say so until the press release),
this will be a camera to be produced on demand rather than in batches based on
expected sales. He also said
If that becomes the street price, I'll start saving too. Might end up selling
most of my smaller format gear in the process, though.
Jostein
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would probably spend $4000 on a D645.
So who here has it in their sights and how much would you be prepared to
spend
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure that I'd want a full frame camera, mainly because of the
problems with vignetting with wide angles.
You know, this and all the other criticisms, praises and predictions for
the future of full-frame sensors are based on an assumption that sensor
technology
I agree with Paul, when my autofocus quit I had to remove
the old batteries, put in a new set and wait almost 30
minutes before everything went back to normal.
Not only do low batteries do wierd things, it appears
that it takes a bit to recover from the wierd too.
Hasn't acted up since.
Don
From: Stuart Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
all,
I am taking my wife to Ney Work city for a birthday
geordie joke
You're going to Middlesbrough?
/geordie joke
I'll explain it if I have to
m
-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
virus-checked using
BH on 34th and 9th Avenue. It's disneyland for photographers, and the
prices are very reasonable.
Paul
On Mar 16, 2005, at 7:11 AM, Stuart Moore wrote:
Hi all,
I am taking my wife to Ney Work city for a birthday weekend in June
and it seems a good opportunity to buy some additional odds and
Enough of this enablement, time for belt tightening
Or some picture taking!
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mar 15, 2005 10:08 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: How much do you have invested in your camera equipment ??
I just did
My thoughts exactly.
Jim
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
Wednesday, March 16, 2005, 2:38:32 AM, Fred wrote:
The discussion regarding who would buy the new D645 made me wonder how
much you folk spend on your career/hobby/addiction.
People might want to think twice about publishing the value of their
equipment
Well, I've just joined the ranks of Grandfatherhood.
I now have a legitimate excuse for being wierd with
the birth of my first Grandchild 'Isabel Lynn'. (I'm told that
it is the sworn duty of all Grampa's to act strange.) ;-)
Another baby with poor timing, just like me! I was born
at 5:34 am, she
They'd never dare visit here with the ever vigilant
Beauregard on duty!
http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/Beau_Yawn_Web.jpg
BTW: I have exactly $1.04 worth of gear.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Bob W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 1:55 AM
To:
BH and Adorama are the two shops I visit when I'm in NYC.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/images/map_r2_c2.gif is the map for locating BH
http://www.adorama.com/catalog.tpl?op=contactus (no map for Adorama but
their information is on that page)
Adorama and BH are more midtown locations. Please NOTE
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:43:24 -0600, Don Sanderson wrote:
Not only do low batteries do wierd things, it appears
that it takes a bit to recover from the wierd too.
That doesn't really surprise me. The low voltage can affect writes to
non-volatile (flash?) memory inside the camera. It's
Hey there's an idea! Maybe I should take all this stuff out it's box. :-)
Don't worry Kenneth all my kit is getting a good workout.
All my recent spending hasn't all been on photographic equipment. In
my numbers I took into account much needed software computer
hardware upgrades.
Dave S
On
Congratulations Gramps. :-)
Dave S
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:12:09 -0600, Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I've just joined the ranks of Grandfatherhood.
I now have a legitimate excuse for being wierd with
the birth of my first Grandchild 'Isabel Lynn'. (I'm told that
it is the
In a message dated 3/16/2005 5:13:16 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Funny, I don't feel (or act) any older! ;-)
Took place a couple of hundred miles from here but
I'll see to it y'all have to put up with some pics one
of these days.
Don
===
Congrats, gramps!
Marnie
In a message dated 3/16/2005 5:29:03 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW: I have exactly $1.04 worth of gear.
Don
=
Well, just because I said that I've spent approx. $4,000 over 4 years doesn't
mean I actually $4,000 of gear. No way, not possible, I have too many
Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I've just joined the ranks of Grandfatherhood.
I now have a legitimate excuse for being wierd with
the birth of my first Grandchild 'Isabel Lynn'. (I'm told that
it is the sworn duty of all Grampa's to act strange.) ;-)
Ah, so that's why you've spent
Paul Ewins wrote:
I learned the hard way that early 6x7s can't be repaired. The
one on the right is the early version (mk 1?) with the
checker spool release while the left hand one is the later
style, still without MLU.
My early one (non-MLU) was bought at a time when most people were
In a message dated 3/15/2005 11:15:23 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, I'd what I'd like an interpretation of is that interpretation
statement.
Sometimes I don't understand everything I read from this list but this
is too much. :-O While I understand every word I
That's a lot more than me, wanna borrow Beau? ;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 7:49 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: How much do you have invested in your camera equipment ??
In a message
Exactly!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 8:04 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Just call me Gramps!
Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I've just joined the ranks of Grandfatherhood.
I
- Original Message -
From: Bob W
Subject: Re: How much do you have invested in your camera equipment
??
People might want to think twice about publishing the value of
their
equipment on a list for every burglar on the internet to read.
Knowing
most people's names, and roughly where
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Pentax News
I don't necessarily see that as a minus for advanced amateurs or
part-time pros. It makes the 35mm equipment more affordable. I may
go to 645 if it's somewhat affordable, but I would certainly want
to continue with
To address a recent thread:
Yes, the exposure compensation knob on a SuperA/Super
Program does, indeed, control the flash output when
the main dial is set to M and aperture is set on the
lens.
Experimental details: Super Program with film speed
set to 200, Sunpak 30DX flash. Metered in a dim
Interesting I had no problems getting my 6x7 repaired about a year ago,
and at a local shop. He wouldn't touch my LX, Pz-1p, or Mz-S though
- MCC
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
www.markcassino.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Thanks Rick, good info!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Rick Womer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 8:15 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: SuperA/Program flash compensation: Experimental confirmation
To address a recent thread:
Yes, the exposure
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/03/16 Wed PM 02:05:41 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: How much do you have invested in your camera equipment ??
- Original Message -
From: Bob W
Subject: Re: How much do you have invested in your camera equipment
From one Grampa to another, I have to tell you it's a good thing. My
grandaughter lives in Scotland (and I'm in the states), so I haven't seen her.
But her and mom will be coming over later this spring. Congratulations on your
new one.
Paul
Well, I've just joined the ranks of
I guess I can skip the full frame speculations that I haven't read yet.
Whew, a few more messages to delete from my email box.
Marnie (I'm trying, Doug, I'm trying.)
That confirms what I thought ... though I think that with the shutter
on P or the lens on A, the exposure compensation knob would adjust
both the ambient exposure and flash output. Isn't that the case on
all Pentax bodies with TTL flash, except for the PZ-1p, where they
finally made flash
In a message dated 3/16/2005 5:39:21 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey there's an idea! Maybe I should take all this stuff out it's box. :-)
Don't worry Kenneth all my kit is getting a good workout.
All my recent spending hasn't all been on photographic equipment. In
my
In a message dated 3/16/2005 1:29:15 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Slim pickin's this week: I'm in the midst of packing up stuff for
moving, fixing all the vehicles and getting them ready for the move,
etc. I liked the light on this people shot, though...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mused:
Village Idiot
PS How do you pronounce *ist?
=
Everyone seems to call them the D or DS. I'm glad. I haven't gotten the trick
down yet of sneezing right before saying D/DS.
Marnie :-)
The disaster might make for an interesting photo ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3196973size=lg
Nice, although it would be better for me if I didn't have this sense of
imminent disaster since he isn't
Probably, but I didn't have time to test things
further last night.
Rick
--- Joe Wilensky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That confirms what I thought ... though I think that
with the shutter
on P or the lens on A, the exposure compensation
knob would adjust
both the ambient exposure and flash
Hey, Gramps ...
Congratulations. This is a good place to act strange. Thus far I don't
see any more strangeness than usual ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Don Sanderson
Well, I've just joined the ranks of Grandfatherhood.
I now have a legitimate excuse for being wierd with
the
I like the light as well. It's also neat that we don't see what he's doing
with his hands, and we don't see all of the chair on the right. Nice
juxtaposition and symmetry.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Slim pickin's this week: I'm in the midst of packing up stuff for
I keep a spreadsheet for insurance purposes.
It tells me I have appr. 16,000-17,000 USD invested in photographic
equipment - not counting scanner, printer and other computer stuff. Man,
that's just too much! I try to keep it down. So, whenever I buy something,
I'll sell something :-)
Jens Bladt
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well last week i bought a Sigma 300 F4 for the istD
and today i bought the Sigma 170-500
for the Nikon.
Why oh why, does the little devil voice in my head
talk louder then the cute little angel
voice.g
Voice from a different devil:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:15:49 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you should give your equipment away. Not sell it, but give
it. To someone who will use it and love it. vbg
Frank's after your fisheye lenses.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
I dunno about that Mike. Koalas may look cute but they are notoriously
bad tempered when they come down from their eucalyptus leaf high :-)
Dave S
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:21:05 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Combined ferocity: almost that of a cross Koala, from what
http://labs.google.com/googlex/
complete with the dock and with compliments to the OSX :-)
Bedo.
Very nice.
How do you like the MkII
My D2h seems ok now(limited winter use mined you),after the AE board
replacement last
fall.If it fails
again,i'm selling and going for the 1D-MkII.
Dave
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well last week i bought a
frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:01:19 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AGG.
Are you trying to say that you first used PESO? Or are you groaning
about the PESO/coined thing?
always curious,
frank
Bad puns deserve a groan, the worse the
On Mar 16, 2005, at 4:20 AM, Jostein wrote:
Looks like a Mac and/or Photoshop problem.
Hmmm...
I just used the Windows Explorer and added some custom fields to the
Details
view. One field called image created date shows nothing. I agree
with you
about the interpretation of the file created date,
På 16. mar. 2005 kl. 13.48 skrev Mark Roberts:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure that I'd want a full frame camera, mainly because of the
problems with vignetting with wide angles.
You know, this and all the other criticisms, praises and predictions
for
the future of full-frame sensors are
On Mar 16, 2005, at 4:48 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I'm not sure that I'd want a full frame camera, mainly because of the
problems with vignetting with wide angles.
You know, this and all the other criticisms, praises and predictions
for
the future of full-frame sensors are based on an assumption
On 16/3/05, Don Sanderson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, I've just joined the ranks of Grandfatherhood.
I now have a legitimate excuse for being wierd with
the birth of my first Grandchild 'Isabel Lynn'. (I'm told that
it is the sworn duty of all Grampa's to act strange.) ;-)
Another baby
Powell Hargrave wrote:
Kodak (and others} are going wireless with photography. Interesting.
http://www.creativepro.com/story/news/22648.html?cprose=daily
I see how this can have useful applications besides the gee-whiz factor but
it does not interest me at all.
Do you desire a wireless camera?
On Mar 16, 2005, at 5:12 AM, Don Sanderson wrote:
Well, I've just joined the ranks of Grandfatherhood.
Congratulations!
I now have a legitimate excuse for being wierd with
the birth of my first Grandchild 'Isabel Lynn'. (I'm told that
it is the sworn duty of all Grampa's to act strange.) ;-) ...
Quoting John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Godfrey DiGiorgi mused:
Personally, I find all these variations on the theme of Program mode
too much to think about. I use Program mode with the EV compensation
control for simplicity when I don't really have to watch the focus zone
or
Quoting Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Actually, it's probably some obscure Canadian National Holiday...
like celebrating the return of the Canadian Geese.
actually, I think it was Commonwealth Day yesterday, so half the world
was celebrating their great good fortune in belonging heart
Doug Franklin wrote:
I'd have to curtail another expensive hobby (racing, guns, or women :-)
to get a digital SLR. It's going to happen, it's just a matter of when
and what hobby takes one for the team.
Racing? You could probably finance a digital SLR, a small arsenal, Paris
Hilton and a couple
I have a rash now, too.
Marnie
1 - 100 of 372 matches
Mail list logo
