Interesting, although the bugs are a distraction. You could clone them
out. Just pretend you're cleaning up a film scan:-).
Paul
On Oct 4, 2006, at 4:36 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Ok. I took my latest enablement for a test spin. I took a lot of boring
photographs of tiny birds in middle of frame
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Apart from anything else, our email addresses are no longer private.
Given that anyone can subscribe to the list, they never were private.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 03.10.2006, at 17:16 , Boris Liberman wrote:
Which, just by the way, means that people who shoot other brands will
have easy access to Pentax lenses *and coatings*.
Other brands won't have weather sealings and ultrasonic AF in these
new Tokinas ;-) And Tokina will have their own coatings
True, but the shots of the old Pentax concept cameras were ripped
straight from DPR.
Dave
On 10/4/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of the images I saw on Pentax Life were Pentax PR pics that were
also used on DPreview but were not exclusively theirs.
Paul
--
PDML
On 2006-09-29 14:25, Juan Buhler wrote:
Of course, I suggested he goes with the K10D, saying that its specs
are closer to a D200 than to a D80. He's leaning towards it, but says
that he likes that Nikon has an 18-135 lens--he doesn't want to carry
any extra lenses (!).
He should take a
On Oct 4, 2006, at 5:47 AM, Gonz wrote:
I downloaded ACR 3.5 and I still see the strange tint. Its almost
as if
the Pentax software is writing the DNG incorrectly.
Why not just adjust the white balance until it is correct and never
mind what color temperature the RAW converter wants to
Nice shot, I like the light.
Unfortunately, the bugs in the air look like dust specks on a slide.
Godfrey
On Oct 4, 2006, at 9:36 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Ok. I took my latest enablement for a test spin. I took a lot of
boring
photographs of tiny birds in middle of frame (they where far from
But they originally came from Pentax as well. They're PR pics. Anyone
can use them.
Paul
On Oct 4, 2006, at 6:18 AM, David Savage wrote:
True, but the shots of the old Pentax concept cameras were ripped
straight from DPR.
Dave
On 10/4/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of the
Thanks Dave. The light was pretty different from what you see here, but it
was stunning.
About the bugs, please see my reply to Paul.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Mann
Sent: 4.
Since the PDML archives are searchable anonymously by the public,
this is in fact a public forum.
Godfrey
On Oct 4, 2006, at 3:01 AM, John Coyle wrote:
Shel, if you go to http://www.publicdomainregistry.com/whois/ and
enter the
domain name you will find it is published by a guy in
Thanks for looking Paul.
I do see your point about the bugs. In fact I did clone some out. Those I
did found distracting. The rest for some strange reason corresponds with an
odd idea I have about the bird.
I'm not able to communicate this idea in words, if the picture fails too,
then I'm mute
I don't know what the issue is other than prudishness.
To bugger someone means to have anal intercourse with them. Seems to
be this parlance that is more British English than American English,
though. To call something a nasty little bugger is often used in
American English to mean
Bugger off, Frank ;-)
What's wrong about that word? Why do you have so many wrong words? What's
the point with a word, when it's wrong?
Seriously: I may need an offline hint about this mysterious meaning of the
word too.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
Hi!
Tim, I don't feel or think of anything in particular when I look at
the picture. I just see a bird most probably in bird's natural
habitat...
I could probably think of something related to freedom but I must
tell you it would mean I was really pullin' it.
Like I said - I see an interesting
Thanks Godfrey.
There is a massive critique against the bugs. Maybe I should rethink about
them? ;-)
The light is not natural. It is what I saw when playing with the file.
Something beyond reality, and for some reason my vision included bugs ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Hi!
Which, just by the way, means that people who shoot other brands will
have easy access to Pentax lenses *and coatings*.
Other brands won't have weather sealings and ultrasonic AF in these
new Tokinas ;-) And Tokina will have their own coatings (they have
used glass and coatings from
Lots of companies use Hoya glass, even Leica. I'm sure Pentax is using
Hoya glass where appropriate.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk
Other brands won't have weather sealings and ultrasonic AF in these
new Tokinas ;-) And Tokina will have their own coatings (they have
You are not the one to blame if it's not what I intended ;-)
So, no reason to be sorry.
Thanks Boris, appreciated.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: 4. oktober 2006 12:52
I suppose I was over reacting. Privacy is a very big issue with me.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: 10/4/2006 5:13:11 AM
Subject: Re: Pentax Life
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Apart
I'm not too sure of that. If Pentax were going to distribute photos I
doubt they would have been taken through the display case at their
Photokina stand.
Also, I just went and had a look at the PentaxLife site. Since I first
mentioned this a week or so ago he seems to have taken the pictures,
It's pretty mild language here. I tend to utter it when something stuffs up.
An ad campaign a few years ago for Toyota New Zealand featured it quite heavily:
http://www.videofoundry.co.nz/ianman/humour/bugger.html
From what I've read it received 100+ official complaints in NZ and 1 here in
Oz.
Oh, by the way, the bugs absolutely don't bug me.
On 10/4/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are not the one to blame if it's not what I intended ;-)
So, no reason to be sorry.
Thanks Boris, appreciated.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
Thanks Godfrey.
There are so many words that are not proper. Sometimes I wonder what a list
of proper words would look. How many entries? 20? Hopefully a bit more, but
you get my point.
To bug somebody is being a nuisance. I get that. And being a nuisance is
also described as being an ass. I
On 04.10.2006, at 12:56 , Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Lots of companies use Hoya glass, even Leica. I'm sure Pentax is
using
Hoya glass where appropriate.
But SMC is Pentax own, isn't it? ;-)
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 04/10/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04.10.2006, at 12:56 , Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Lots of companies use Hoya glass, even Leica. I'm sure Pentax is
using
Hoya glass where appropriate.
But SMC is Pentax own, isn't it? ;-)
Practically the same as the CZ T* coatings I
Spam Reduction. And only that.
-Adam
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Well then, what's the point of trying to disguise the email addresses in
the archives if it's not to provide some privacy?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Adam Maas
Huh?
The point of having a mailing list is to make
In english, almost all rude slang is either scatological or sexual. Damn
and its variants are the major exception. Unlike say french, where much
rude slang is blasphmemous.
-Adam
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Thanks Godfrey.
There are so many words that are not proper. Sometimes I wonder what a list
Supposedly, although there has been discussion that it and the Zeiss T*
coatings are the same or at least quite similar. I read more than once
that Pentax and Zeiss had (and I can't recall exactly what it was) a
relationship in developing their coatings. It's quite possible that over
the years
Yes ... certainly at one time, but as I noted elsewhere, they may have
diverged at some point.
A few years ago Mark Dalal and I compared his CZ T* 85/1.4 with my Pentax
A* 85/1.4. They were much more alike than different.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Digital Image Studio
But SMC is
Thanks, Tim. Jocelyn is not a model by any means. She's my
girlfriend, and my frequent subject for class assignments. :) I was
completeing an assignment on window lighting.
I was using the A50/1.7 at 5.6 and 1/200s.
Mike
On 10/4/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A fine portrait IMO. I
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
On 04.10.2006, at 12:56 , Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Lots of companies use Hoya glass, even Leica. I'm sure Pentax is
using
Hoya glass where appropriate.
But SMC is Pentax own, isn't it? ;-)
Cheers,
Sylwek
Yes, but SMC isn't glass, it's coatings. Pentax does
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/04 Wed AM 09:34:49 GMT
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: PESO - Another Cormorant
B/W? Could be worth a try. Thanks ;-)
But I do wonder, does the idea get across?
The bird sits still and silent through
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
On 04.10.2006, at 12:56 , Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Lots of companies use Hoya glass, even Leica. I'm sure Pentax is
using
Hoya glass where appropriate.
But SMC is Pentax own, isn't it? ;-)
SMC was revolutionary 30-odd years ago, but these days anyone with the
NPR piece on an exhibit at the National Gallery of Art w/photos by
Walker Evans, Robert Frank, Helen Levitt and others, taken from 1938
through 1958. Includes a slide show sampler for another glimpse at
history. Would be a good outing for anyone traveling to DC.
But we were talking about coatings :-)
On 04.10.2006, at 14:35 , Adam Maas wrote:
Yes, but SMC isn't glass, it's coatings. Pentax does its own coating,
they buy their glass elsewhere (likely from Hoya).
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thanks!
On 10/2/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting shot ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Scott Loveless
This is my daughter. As I was taking this, she was explaining to me
that it was measuring her hand.
On Oct 4, 2006, at 1:23, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I stumbled around and found I had it done without really
thinking how i did it :)
Now Im slothfully overloading on freecell
There's something delightful about a person spending upwards of
$1,000 on a machine and then using it to duplicate the
On 10/2/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 2, 2006, at 3:05 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
This is my daughter. As I was taking this, she was explaining to me
that it was measuring her hand.
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/
photo#4981291498720985106
I
Thanks, Frank. Much appreciated.
On 10/2/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/2/06, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is really a response to Paul's bandwagon thread. Yesterday was
strange. I spent the afternoon in PJ mode, shooting a family picnic
with the
On 10/2/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/2/06, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Knarf will be next!
No, knarf will be last!
I mean, I know digital's (nearly) inevitable for me, but I'll hang
onto film until the bitter end. They'll have to pry it from my dead,
bony
On 04.10.2006, at 14:33 , Digital Image Studio wrote:
Practically the same as the CZ T* coatings I believe (and from my
experience)
According to various sources Pentax and Zeiss codeveloped SMC and T*
coatings, so that's hardly surprise :-)
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
The use of the word itself is not so bad. Its use in relation to
molested children portraits is what may have been unintentionally
offensive to some people.
Dan
On 10/4/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In english, almost all rude slang is either scatological or sexual. Damn
and its
On 10/4/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kids teach you nature, life, death and other stuff. All the important things
we tend to forget. It's wonderful.
That they do, and yes it is. Thanks, Tim.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
Shoot more film!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 10/2/06, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Me, too. Nice composition particularly.
Thanks, Rick.
Speaking of inchworms, though, the digital thing is
creeping up on you, Scott. Your tag line Shoot more
film! will be replaced with Shoot film!, then
Shoot some film!, then Shoot a little
On 10/3/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hearing voices again, Frank? snip
I always hear voices in my head, Shel. The trick is to ascertain
which ones are real and which ones are imaginary. I find when I wear
my aluminium foil helmet, it allows the real ones through, while
fending
On 10/4/06, Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NPR piece on an exhibit at the National Gallery of Art w/photos by
Walker Evans, Robert Frank, Helen Levitt and others, taken from 1938
through 1958. Includes a slide show sampler for another glimpse at
history. Would be a good outing for
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Pentax medium formats
Basically what your saying is if you don't look close you cant
Tell the difference. Well there is a difference IF YOU ACTUALLY LOOK.
Its not something that's never seen either IMHO.
What I am saying is if
Thanks to everyone who took the time to wade through my website.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
In english, almost all rude slang is either scatological or sexual. Damn
and its variants are the major exception. Unlike say french, where much
rude slang is blasphmemous.
We are equal
On 10/4/06, Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The use of the word itself is not so bad. Its use in relation to
molested children portraits is what may have been unintentionally
offensive to some people.
I think that summarizes my feelings exactly, Dan. BTW, I brought it
up to
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby
Subject: RE: GESO: What I did on my summer vacation
Looks like you had a nice trip.
I think I'll show the Rottie gallery to my wife. I like Rotties, and
it is
time to replace Ludvik, but she is afraid of them, so she says no. I
hope
these
On 10/4/06, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/
photo#4981291498720985106
I can buy that. The colors are a bit subdued, but I tend to like that
in color photography. What brand of sparkle did you have in mind?
Maybe a bit of curves
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Matt Kelch
Subject: Loose lens mount on used SMC Pentax-A Zoom...
I recently picked up a used SMC Pentax-A 1:4 70-210mm zoom for around
40.00. Its in absolutely great condition, but the bayonet mount is a
bit loose where it is
Well, then he's apparently trying to keep things on the up and up. I'm sure
Pentax appreciates what he's doing. So do I.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not too sure of that. If Pentax were going to distribute photos I
doubt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scott Loveless
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 9:59 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO -- two more
Two more from my day with the K100D. The first was taken just before
sunset:
If so, check out;
http://www.adobe.com/digitalimag/ideagallery/
Bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 10/4/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
In english, almost all rude slang is either scatological or sexual. Damn
and its variants are the major exception. Unlike say
Two more from my day with the K100D. The first was taken just before
sunset:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#4982033758228709394
The next is another portrait of my daughter:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#4982033756927229970
Of course, any
On 10/4/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A sweet and gentle moment ;-))
BTW, I liked the night shot too. Do you recall the tech details on that
one? I'm really mostly interested in the ISO rating.
Thanks, Shel. ISO 200, f11, multisegmented metering. I took several
shots of this
A sweet and gentle moment ;-))
BTW, I liked the night shot too. Do you recall the tech details on that
one? I'm really mostly interested in the ISO rating.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Scott Loveless
The next is another portrait of my daughter:
http://www.graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 10/3/2006 11:07:46 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it doesn't take care of everything, actually.
I've been treating myself to freecell - however, I can't
bring the freecell window up
to fill up the screen.. although the type on the tool bar
for it got big.
On 10/4/06, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I can't get the coffee out of my keyboard, yer buying me a new one.
It's a bad sign when a man can't handle his coffee. Maybe it's time to
switch to booze.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 10/4/06, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I can't get the coffee out of my keyboard, [Robb's] buying me a new one.
Yeah.
Like that'll happen...
cheers,
frank
g
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
In a message dated 10/4/2006 6:07:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SMC was revolutionary 30-odd years ago, but these days anyone with the
right software and a basic understanding of optics can design high
performance multi-layer optical coatings. SMC is just a brand.
On 10/4/06, Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two more from my day with the K100D. The first was taken just before
sunset:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#4982033758228709394
I love the God rays!!!
The next is another portrait of my daughter:
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/03 Tue PM 11:20:29 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: John Dvorak (via Mike J's blog)
On Oct 3, 2006, at 5:20 PM, mike wilson wrote:
John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 04:01:08PM -0400, frank
In a message dated 10/3/2006 10:18:54 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems that I can pull up anyone's email address just by clicking on a
message. I was quite surprised to find that anyone could access the
archives without being subscribed to the list.
Shel
You
No, not that one - the starry night shot showing the roof of the house.
This one:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#4978870170851409938
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Scott Loveless
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
A sweet and gentle moment ;-))
BTW, I liked the night
On 10/4/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/4/06, Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The use of the word itself is not so bad. Its use in relation to
molested children portraits is what may have been unintentionally
offensive to some people.
I think that summarizes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not quite true. Canon lenses will flare in situations Pentax lenses won't.
Not all Pentax lenses flare less, but a lot do. It wasn't just hype.
Ah, now just because any idiot can design coatings as good as SMC, it
doesn't mean that they do. ;-)
S
--
PDML
In a message dated 10/3/2006 7:49:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This guy is providing a valuable service. I wouldn't say anything on
the list that I didn't want other Pentax owners to hear. I find it a
little paranoid to worry about him quoting the list. Quote away, I
I was _stunned_ by the amount of flare produced by one of my Leica lenses.
In the same situation there was no flare from the Pentax glass. Granted,
the Pentax glass had an early coating (K-mount) and the Leica was quite a
bit newer LOL
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not quite true. Canon lenses will flare in situations Pentax lenses won't.
Not all Pentax lenses flare less, but a lot do. It wasn't just hype.
Ah, now just because any idiot can design coatings as good as SMC, it
doesn't mean that they do. ;-)
S
--
PDML
Thanks to all of you for your very nice comments
Pål
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 10/4/2006 8:09:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think not ... I already spend too much time in front of the computer. I
need to get out more, exercise more, photograph more, socialize more ...
I agree that you sometimes (often?) provide more info than
On 04.10.2006, at 16:42 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not quite true. Canon lenses will flare in situations Pentax lenses
won't.
Not all Pentax lenses flare less, but a lot do. It wasn't just hype.
Exactly the same situation is with modern Minolta lenses. My friend
who had FA 50/1.7 met his
I think not ... I already spend too much time in front of the computer. I
need to get out more, exercise more, photograph more, socialize more ...
I agree that you sometimes (often?) provide more info than is needed.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You need to google
On 10/3/06, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One last PESO for a while.
http://www.mindspring.com/~morephotos/PESO_--_sunset.html
Beautiful and serene. Love the colour of the sky. Very well composed
- the boat's about perfect.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
Or maybe kit means that not just any idiot can design coatings as good.
Just because there's some software out there that helps design such
coatings doesn't mean that it comes with 30+ years of experience with
coatings, collaboration with other great lens makers, and a feel for
quality optics and
On 10/1/06, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A good friend got married a month ago in a quaint
chapel on the Maine coast. I wasn't the official
photographer (fortunately), but took a lot of pics for
the fun of it.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=648705
Just catching up on
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, P. J. Alling wrote:
I thought the 645 users were the junior brothers of the brotherhood,
Ahem, that was the Little Brotherhood. ;) We were better than those
Brotherhood types, if for no other reason than our backs were unbowed from
lack of weight 'round our necks.
I went
Well isn't that what buggery is stuffing something up?
David Savage wrote:
It's pretty mild language here. I tend to utter it when something stuffs up.
An ad campaign a few years ago for Toyota New Zealand featured it quite
heavily:
http://www.videofoundry.co.nz/ianman/humour/bugger.html
For most subjects, I get nice 11 x 17 prints from my 6 megapixel camera. That's
with Photoshop RAW converter interpolation to a 72 megabyte file. I expect to
be able to get very nice 11 x 17s from the 10 megapixel. I think it will even
prove quite good on highly detailed subjects like
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David J Brooks
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:29 AM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Are you considering PSE 5.0?
I take it your happy with it Bill.
Very happy with it.
I hear it has curves, and a
How big enlargements can one expect to get out of a 10mp DSLR like the K10D?
A3 format?
I've never used a digital camera
Pål
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I like version two better.
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Ok. I took my latest enablement for a test spin. I took a lot of boring
photographs of tiny birds in middle of frame (they where far from the shore
yesterday). But this fella had come back to it's regular spot.
I was shooting almost directly into
I take it your happy with it Bill.
I hear it has curves, and a few other things added from The Mother Ship
Dave
Quoting Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If so, check out;
http://www.adobe.com/digitalimag/ideagallery/
Bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 4, 2006, at 5:47 AM, Gonz wrote:
I downloaded ACR 3.5 and I still see the strange tint. Its almost
as if
the Pentax software is writing the DNG incorrectly.
Why not just adjust the white balance until it is correct and never
mind what color
Very very nice!
Tom C.
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PAW - Sunflower
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 22:23:00 +1300
Back to the pretty flower photos. I might print this one tomorrow.
Pål Jensen wrote:
How big enlargements can one expect to get out of a 10mp DSLR like the K10D?
A3 format?
I've never used a digital camera
it depends. I've made 20x30 inch prints from 6mp (*ist D) by upsizing
and interpolation. The level of detail is pretty darn good too. Of
course
On Oct 4, 2006, at 4:26 PM, Pål Jensen wrote:
How big enlargements can one expect to get out of a 10mp DSLR like
the K10D?
A3 format?
I find 180 to 200 ppi produces very satisfactory rendering quality
for A3 and A3 Super sized prints. A K10D body produces full-frame
image with
You're right the little 35 to 70mm isn't the sharpest lens Pentax ever
made. It isn't even the sharpest zoom that Pentax ever made. It falls
short a bit short when compared to the 20-35mm f4.0 or it's original
stablemate the 70-210mm f4-5.6. But then the 20-35 is damn near the
sharpest zoom
In a message dated 10/4/2006 8:50:27 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well isn't that what buggery is stuffing something up?
==
Now it's getting a bit offensive.
Marnie :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 10/4/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, not that one - the starry night shot showing the roof of the house.
This one:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#4978870170851409938
Sorry, Shel, I misunderstood. I don't recall the ISO right now. I'll
take a look
I have observed over time some preferences among many of the listers
concerning how a photo should 'look' - I'm sure that some of it is in
relation to the monitor that it is being displayed on, but some of it
seems to be a preference.
Back in the film days, you could look at a slide or print of
What is upsampling and how is it done?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
If more print output density or a larger print is desirable, you
upsample either in the RAW conversion processing or in post
processing. You get no more detail but the rendering is usually
There is an inevitable trade off between image size, camera size and
convenience.
Each of us will have a point at which they feel comfortable in this
continuum. For some who value image quality above all, they're willing to
carry a 10x8 field camera around with them, for others it's a Minox
On 4/10/06, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.photosight.org/photo.php?photoid=44261ref=author
Lovely pic Tim. You might clone out the cormorant, it's a tad distracting ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Bob W wrote:
Well stated Keith!
Especially the part about Bob W. and Christian being ~both~
wrong. LOL
Keith's wrong about us both being wrong. Keith and Christian are both
wrong, so obviously you're wrong about Keith being right - he's wrong.
Right?
Bob
Uhhh, yes.
keith
--
PDML
1 - 100 of 299 matches
Mail list logo
