On 5/26/2020 9:28 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
The publication in media of pictures of kids falls within the
responsibility of their parents according European Union GDPR privacy
legislation.
So yes, this is logical decision of the judge.
Henk
Op 2020-05-26 om 17:28 schreef Daniel J. Matyola:
The person who wrote the article has not given any reasons why they think the
judgement is “silly” and appears not to have understood either the GDPR or the
ruling, even though they highlight the key facts that make this more than just
a personal and family matter.
Social media platforms
As some of you know, our home was flooded last week, high water at 27 3/8
inches inside.
So we have been hauling stuff out, a lot to the curb for trash pickup, much
still to be sorted, decisions about what to try to preserve/restore...
[Side note. Most of my camera gear was high and dry, my
Wow, Stan , that is a huge blow. My only thought re the negatives is to ensure
you try to save family ones, as my experience in the last few weeks scanning
and processing those I brought from my mother's house is that even the most
seemingly inconsequential one can turn out to be significant.
Sadly Facebook takes full advantage of people who don't understand that.
On 5/26/2020 11:53 AM, Bob Pdml wrote:
The person who wrote the article has not given any reasons why they think the
judgement is “silly” and appears not to have understood either the GDPR or the
ruling, even though they
> On May 26, 2020, at 7:33 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
>
> As some of you know, our home was flooded last week, high water at 27 3/8
> inches inside.
I’m so sorry to hear that.
> So we have been hauling stuff out, a lot to the curb for trash pickup, much
> still to be sorted, decisions about
8 matches
Mail list logo
