Assuming that Pentax eventually sells a DSLR with APS sized
sensor, what prime lens would you use on it for your fast normal
lens?
And the old K 2.8/30mm = 2.8/45mm (the best !)
Except that, for many of us, an f/2.8 lens might not really qualify
as a fast normal lens.
Fred
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, tom wrote:
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/PDML5.jpg
Courtesy of a former PDMLer and his D100. Notice that Cesar is
handling the faux snakeskin boots.
Not to me ntion the wild-eyed look he's giving them...
--
http://www.infotainment.org - more fun than a poke in
Sell a kid? Where? They don't let you sell things like kids or livers on
ebay.
If anyone would like to purchase a teenage male in fair to good
condition, please contact me off line.
BR
:
on 2/26/03 6:14 AM, Paul Franklin Stregevsky at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Stan wrote:
Would you sell the
Sorry to hear you sold your K 85/1.8.
Thanks for your condolences, Jose. sniff (g) Well, I'll
somehow manege to get by with my A* 85/1.4... (g) (And, if
desired, I can still use the FA* 85/1,4, which is now my wife's
lens, and I'm still having some fun with the Kenko 85/2.5 Soft,
too.)
Rob wrote:
Sorry to sound just a little negative but does this really surprise you?
Well, they have been saying this since last fall so it is hardly surprising.
Pål
Artur wrote:
I just think to myself...
Is it justified to expect Pentax to show more new stuff at the PMA? Even the DSLR? I
mean Pentax has already presented a new SLR, 2 new lenses and 2 DPS - that's quite
a lot, isn't it?. If they have new stuff that is ready to be introduced, they'd
Well, as the subject line says, there was a nice story on Margaret
Bourke-White on NPR's (that's National Public Radio for those outside
the U.S.) Morning Edition program this morning. If you're on the West
coast I suppose there's still time to tune in and hear it.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography
Now I want a portrait lens. (only for portrait) Would people
generally agree that the 85/2 would be superior to the 85/1.8 for
purely portrait purposes? That would save me quite a bit of
money...
Whoa! Absolutely not! The M 85/2 (in my opinion) is a surprisingly
good little portrait lens,
Hi Boris,
on 09 Feb 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
If you decide to sell it anyway, don't forget to give me a call,
that is send an e-mail...
If you are still interested in my 28-70/4.0 then you can have it. I've
decided to sell it as I prefer my 28-105 Powerzoom. I have also a SMC FA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replying late to this! Sorry, but...
I'm likely going to be doing some extreme macro photography this summer
(in the 1X to 4X range), so I've been seriously considering getting a
body that offers MLU.
Hence my interest in a classic body that offers MLU. LX is
Yeah, but what about those of us who use lenses to take photos, rather
than to feel?
They use Canon.
:)) Good one...
OK. The action of the autofocus is extremely loose. So any single bad
move can bring it out of focus. (for more practical souls :))
L
Dear all,
The news finally come:
http://www.letsgodigital.nl/webpages/events/PMA-2003/news/pentax/SLR-IST_uk.html
Cheers!
Henry Chu
26/2/2003
_
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
Well stated John.
I might add that the 600 is THE lens for places such as
Denali National Park where much wild life is visible
from the (only) road. After several visits to Denali
without a 600, I purchased one and used it, (many times
with the 1.4L convertor), on my last visit to the park.
It
Dear all,
We can find pentaprism and hyper-program on *ist-D.
Too good to be true!
Cheers!
Henry Chu
26/2/2003
_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
Kodak is no longer supporting the scanners used for the
Photo CD. Repairs must be handled by the local
operators.
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 06:39:49 -0800 (PST), Pat White
wrote:
The Picture CD gives 4-meg files, which are good for
about 5x7s at best.
The PhotoCD, however, gives 18-meg files,
Just on the small chance this hasn't been posted to the group yet...
www.letsgodigital.nl/webpages/events/PMA-2003/news/pentax/SLR-IST_uk.html
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, as the subject line says, there was a nice story on Margaret
Bourke-White on NPR's (that's National Public Radio for
those outside
the U.S.) Morning Edition program this morning. If you're
on the West
coast
Never been that glad to be proved wrong!
After the first look:
- the picture is still that of the film *ist;
- the viewfinder looks promising: 0.95x and 95% coverage, still with
the dreaded superimposed AF sensors;
- it is compatible with the K lenses!
[there go two of my main
On Wednesday, Feb 26, 2003, at 15:34 Europe/Warsaw, Iren Henry Chu
wrote:
The news finally come:
http://www.letsgodigital.nl/webpages/events/PMA-2003/news/pentax/SLR-
IST_uk.html
Wow! Have you seen that? Viewfinder 0.95x and 95% coverage! And it is
such a small compared to other DSLRs.
The user interface differs from the film *ist: it sports two dials
dedicated for speed and aperture. Add hyper manual and it's obvious
this camera is *not* entry-level, it's aimed straight to enthusiasts.
Servus, Alin
Dear all,
According to letsgodigital.nl, the new wide angle zoom lens when mounting on
the D-SLR is a 28-54mm zoom. Translating to 135 format, it is only a
18.7-36mm zoom, which is very similar to the existing FA20-35/4AL.
Therefore, there are two possibilities for the new lens: it is either
Alin Flaider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never been that glad to be proved wrong!
After the first look:
- the picture is still that of the film *ist;
- the viewfinder looks promising: 0.95x and 95% coverage,
Of course, that's because it only has to cover the smaller area exposed
by the
Small indeed, I just measured, and this is very close to
the dimensions of my MZ-3 (same as MZ-5n I guess)!
Regards, JvW
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:00:50 +0100, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
http://www.letsgodigital.nl/webpages/events/PMA-2003/news/pentax/SLR-
IST_uk.html
Wow! Have you seen that?
And
It's
HERE!
http://www.letsgodigital.nl/webpages/events/PMA-2003/news/pentax/SLR-IST_uk.
html
Cool..
June/July 2003 launch..
now the big question:
Price Price Price Price Price
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:23:54 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Andit's HERE!
And
Hi Alin,
on 26 Feb 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
- the viewfinder looks promising: 0.95x and 95% coverage, still with
the dreaded superimposed AF sensors;
- it is compatible with the K lenses!
These features are impressing! There is no actual analog SLR with a
comparable viewfinder
The already stated an FAJ 18-35 via our spies.
I really need something more than this, but the DSLR looks fantastic to
me!
Only thing I am not sure about is the use of CCD rather than CMOS...?
-Original Message-
From: Iren Henry Chu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2003
From imaging resource:
No pictures are currently available, but the camera is to be just 7mm
wider and 11mm higher then Pentax's just-announced *ist film SLR - and
actually 4mm less deep than that camera. (We have a picture of the film
camera, but since there is no way to know if it looks
From Pentax press release:
Along with the *ist D, PENTAX announces an exciting wide angle lens for
35mm AF SLR cameras, the smc PENTAX-FA J Zoom 18-35mm F4-5.6 AL.
-Original Message-
From: Iren Henry Chu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2003 15:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The *ist D will officially launch in July 2003.
Other major *ist D features
New 16-segment metering system achieves more accurate exposure
New 11-point AF sensor (SAFOX VIII) realizes enhanced focusing
Fast 1/4000 sec. shutter speed and high-speed flash sync at 1/150 sec.
Continuous shooting
Iren Henry Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to letsgodigital.nl, the new wide angle zoom lens when mounting on
the D-SLR is a 28-54mm zoom. Translating to 135 format, it is only a
18.7-36mm zoom, which is very similar to the existing FA20-35/4AL.
Therefore, there are two possibilities
http://www.pentax.ch/index.php?id=398type=1
Unfortunately - still no photos...
Regards
Sylwek
Okay. I WANT ONE! My mouth is almost watering. Maybe I won't wait a year to go
digital. (Start saving up the pennies now.)
Two questions based on what we know now.
What IS hyper manual? I presume that's manual somehow, but the term is new to me.
How come they won't be ready until summer? Do
Assistant #7.
--
Thomas Van Veen Photography
www.thomasvanveen.com
301-758-3085
-Original Message-
From: Shaun Canning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PDML #5 Group Photo
#7...?
Cheers
Shaun
tom
And depreview:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0302/03022602pentaxistd.asp
More on the DSLR--
I haven't gotten a Digest this morning so I'm assuming I'm incommunicado
from the PDML again, really piss-poor timing for THAT.
http://www.steves-digicams.com/pr/pentax_02262003_istD_pr.html
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Iren Henry Chu wrote:
http://www.letsgodigital.nl/webpages/events/PMA-2003/news/pentax/SLR-IST_uk.html
That's the same *Ist picture as before, though, right? It can't really be
that small compared to the hulking monsters from Canon and Nikon.
--
Sign me up! I gotta credit card around here somewhere.
Christian
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 10:02, Alin Flaider wrote:
The user interface differs from the film *ist: it sports two dials
dedicated for speed and aperture. Add hyper manual and it's obvious
this camera is *not*
Anyone still want to sell their 31,43,77mm limiteds :D
I'll buy it and stick it on this lil beast in July :D
__
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
Knowing Pentax it's will be on the $1200 or lower
side, and compete with those sony/minolta/oly/canon
4-56 MP digi PS cams.
--- Pål_Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David wrote:
Price Price Price Price Price
The old rumor, whose reliability is completely
unknown, says $1600. $1300 street
Sounds like all that was happening is that the car was turning at the
time of the shot.
If you pan the shot trying to keep the driver's helmet in the same
place, the front and rear of the car will change perspective during the
turn, and be blurry. Rather a neat effect, I should try it next time
Here is the release http://www.dpreview.com/
I have been that close to selling my Pentax gear but this changes it all, my
order is placed!
And why not?
http://www.torphoto.net/images/fl3.jpg
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does
this mean no more flower/cat photos?
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
__
Post your free
Unfortunately - still no photos...
One thing at a time, gang. You only have to wait a few more days for the
photos. The prototype will be showed under glass at PMA, and we will get
photos from the show floor to share with the PDML. I'm sure the reason there
are no official photos with the press
Nope why should I, I probably got one of his lenses to
lol.
--- Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone called Marcus posted on Photozone the
following when told about
the *istD:
SHxx!!!
I have sold all my K-mount lenses 7 years ago. Now I
am stucked with
bloody Minolta... :-(((
US press release up now:
http://www.pentax.com/news/news_display.cfm?pressid=152
I wouldn't be surprised that it supports HSS (High Speed Synch) with
the AF360FGZ.
Bruce
Tuesday, February 25, 2003, 7:26:32 PM, you wrote:
bcin Flash sync to slow at 1/150,damn.Nice to see it takes just about any Pentax
bcin lens though.
bcin Dave Brooks
Just like to say hello to you all.
I've been lurking here since just before the MZ-S appeared, got mine on the
first day of issue in UK. Been using Pentax gear on and off since 1977. If
the *ist-D hadn't been announced by mid March I would have flogged my
current gear and been away but what a
It seems that the interface by description, is a bit more like the
PZ-1p style. Still not bad. If the price is good, they could have a
really good thing going here.
Bruce
Wednesday, February 26, 2003, 8:34:36 AM, you wrote:
PJ Alin wrote:
The user interface differs from the film *ist:
-Original Message-
From: Mike Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2003 17:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The D *ist is the real Olydak--?
Unfortunately - still no photos...
One thing at a time, gang. You only have to wait a few more days for the
photos. The
On Wednesday, Feb 26, 2003, at 18:14 Europe/Warsaw, Mike Johnston wrote:
Quite some time ago I wrote a column about the rumored Olydak, the
collaboration between Olympus and Kodak that was supposed to be a
small,
light SLR with purpose-built lenses. Well, I think I got what I was
wishing
for,
Mike SPOP!!!
Or we will flood you with more flower and cat pics
again.
--- Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Unfortunately - still no photos...
One thing at a time, gang. You only have to wait a
few more days for the
photos. The prototype will be showed under glass at
PMA, and we
Hi Stephen,
If it's anything like
http://pug.komkon.org/00june/MotoPan1.html
where there is a distinct difference in blur between various parts
of the driver (much easily spotted on the big enlargement), this
may be due to the slight difference in angle between subject and
Been saving this one in my keepers file for some time now:
Thinking that Pentax will start selling an up to date DSLR, when
they've sold nothing more than simple PS digital cameras, is pure
fantasy.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
-Original Message-
From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2003 17:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: *ist D!!!
US press release up now:
http://www.pentax.com/news/news_display.cfm?pressid=152
Almost the same size as MZ-S
MZ-S5.4
If it ain't black, I don't shoot it. I ain't goin' t'have a camera that so
rounded it looks like it was fashioned from a mold normally used to shape a
bar of soap either.
Regards,
Bob...
---
Beer is proof that God loves us
and wants us to be happy
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Mark Roberts wrote:
Been saving this one in my keepers file for some time now:
Thinking that Pentax will start selling an up to date DSLR, when
they've sold nothing more than simple PS digital cameras, is pure
fantasy.
Of course, one could always argue that the *ist
Okay, I am just a newbie/novice, but something hit me immediately about the D*ist. (I
think, maybe, I stop being a newbie after six months. But, novice? Maybe one to two
years).
1. Your Pentax glass just went up in value. Or will as soon as the D*ist is released.
2. The competition for Pentax
I'm sure y'all have noticed this little codicil on dpreview.com:
In its quest for ever higher performance combined with compact dimensions,
PENTAX has been developing lenses compatible with the new PENTAX digital SLR
camera. PENTAX aims to launch these in fall 2003.
Oh, goody, goody, yummy,
Yours is on order?
Where from, and at what price?
Or were you just talking figuratively?#
Woo hoo indeed, what a day!
-Original Message-
From: zoomshot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2003 17:25
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Been lurking far too long
Just like
hmmm. Where =is= BR?
At 12:43 PM 2/26/03, you wrote:
Been saving this one in my keepers file for some time now:
Thinking that Pentax will start selling an up to date DSLR, when
they've sold nothing more than simple PS digital cameras, is pure
fantasy.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
Anyone else wonder about 'effective' megapixels?
As opposed to what, 'real' megapixels? 'virtual' megapixels?
Are Pentax pixels the same as Nikon pixels?
Inquiring minds would like to know, before plunking down hard earned cash...
Michel Adam
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:02:43 -0500 (EST), gfen wrote:
.95 and 95% coverage, with pentaprism? Could it be a departure of the ZX
tunnelvision viewfinders?
Not really, don't forget this is 95% coverage of APS format (about 16x24) not 24x36.
That is why the prism-housing is probably not much bigger
Bruce wrote:
BD It seems that the interface by description, is a bit more like the
BD PZ-1p style. Still not bad.
*ist (and likely d*ist) sports dials and not wheels. You can turn it
both with one finger while looking through the viewfinder, you have
direct view control when you look from
Just noticed this scary bit on the DP Review web page:
In its quest for ever higher performance combined with compact
dimensions, PENTAX has been developing lenses compatible with the new
PENTAX digital SLR camera. PENTAX aims to launch these in fall 2003.
I suspect this means lenses with
Mark wrote:
Been saving this one in my keepers file for some time now:
Thinking that Pentax will start selling an up to date DSLR, when
they've sold nothing more than simple PS digital cameras, is pure
fantasy.
So have I. How about these:
It isn't that Pentax will use some new
Mike wrote:
In its quest for ever higher performance combined with compact dimensions,
PENTAX has been developing lenses compatible with the new PENTAX digital SLR
camera. PENTAX aims to launch these in fall 2003.
Yep. There are also underground backdoor rumors saying something good will
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. The competition for Pentax glass just increased 5-10 fold. That's if the D*ist looks as good as it seems to and is priced right. In other words, it will probably be a seller.
Which could also mean the value of your Pentax film cameras just took a
nosedive... :-(
--
-Original Message-
From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2003 17:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Been lurking far too long
Yours is on order?
Where from, and at what price?
Or were you just talking figuratively?#
Woo hoo indeed, what a day!
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Mark Roberts wrote:
Been saving this one in my keepers file for some time now:
They've gone this far, and further, before.. Before you heat up Bruce's
humble pie, you may want to actually wait to see 'em in the stores.
--
http://www.infotainment.org - more fun
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else wonder about 'effective' megapixels?
As opposed to what, 'real' megapixels? 'virtual' megapixels?
Are Pentax pixels the same as Nikon pixels?
Inquiring minds would like to know, before plunking down hard earned cash...
Relax. Digital cameras don't use all
Actually, I don't care much for cameras over $5000. Those are rather
demo products. You need to actually own to be able to laugh at...
Servus,Alin
Chris wrote:
CB Of course, one could always argue that the *ist D is not an up-to-date
CB DSLR, since 6MP DSLR's have been around for
On 03.2.26 0:43 PM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Been saving this one in my keepers file for some time now:
Thinking that Pentax will start selling an up to date DSLR, when
they've sold nothing more than simple PS digital cameras, is pure
fantasy.
Oh, he knew fully well Pentax
I've updated my page of info on this lens/lenses:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/vivitar.htm
Thanks, Mark. And I've saved a copy of it already - g.
I do have the Modern Photo lens test results for Version 2, so I'll
dig 'em out and get back to you, if you want to add them to your
table.
Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure y'all have noticed this little codicil on dpreview.com:
In its quest for ever higher performance combined with compact dimensions,
PENTAX has been developing lenses compatible with the new PENTAX digital SLR
camera. PENTAX aims to launch these in
Anyone else wonder about 'effective' megapixels?
Yes, indeed.
Fred
You know, I was just thinking about posting the same thing. He sure has
been quiet today hasn't he?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: Digital *ist news
hmmm. Where =is= BR?
On 03.2.26 1:01 PM, Alin Flaider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*ist (and likely d*ist) sports dials and not wheels. You can turn it
both with one finger while looking through the viewfinder, you have
direct view control when you look from above (with camera on a
tripod). A much better interface
Anybody seen a silver MZ-S?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2914463658category=15240
--
Later,
Gary
Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:43 PM 2/26/03, you wrote:
Been saving this one in my keepers file for some time now:
Thinking that Pentax will start selling an up to date DSLR, when
they've sold nothing more than simple PS digital cameras, is pure
fantasy.
hmmm. Where =is= BR?
Hi gang,
the other day, I was visiting a local photo shop that also sells used
equipment. I was playing with a very nice like new A* 300/4. Out of my
price range, but I couldn't resist the temptation to hold it in my
hands. Meanwhile, two youngsters were browsing the digital camera
shelves,
Gary L. Murphy observed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. The competition for Pentax glass just increased 5-10 fold. That's if the
D*ist looks as good as it seems to and is priced right. In other words, it
will probably be a seller.
Which could also mean the value of your Pentax film cameras just
2. The competition for Pentax glass just increased 5-10 fold. That's if the D*ist
looks as good as it seems to and is priced right. In other words, it will probably
be a seller.
Which could also mean the value of your Pentax film cameras just took a
nosedive... :-(
Or it can mean that
On 03.2.26 0:48 PM, Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At any rate, at least we can laugh at Minolta.
Well, I am not so sure about it. I will hold it.
Ken
Hi all,
Never mind the 6 megapixels, or the small size, or the newest AF system
in any DSLR... here's the biggest advantage of the D*ist --- it takes
ORDINARY AA BATTERIES... you know, the kind you can buy in just about
any small shop, anywhere in the world :-)
This simple thing could get
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Gary,
Yuck!
My exact thoughts!
--
Later,
Gary
Brendan wrote:
you know even with the new today, DAMN this is
tempting.
Help yourself... I think it's UGLY :-)
--
Later,
Gary
HAR!
--- Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hmmm.
Where =is= BR?
Busy selling N***n gear.
cheers,
the caveman
__
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
Woohoo!
An optical pentaprism viewfinder was developed especially for the *ist
D. This makes viewing easy with an ample 95% field of
view and 0.95X magnification. There is also a superimposed display
function which assists composition by illuminating the AF points in
red.
Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never mind the 6 megapixels, or the small size, or the newest AF
system in any DSLR... here's the biggest advantage of the D*ist
--- it takes ORDINARY AA BATTERIES... you know, the kind you can
buy in just about any small shop, anywhere in the world :-)
;-)
John Poirier wrote:
My first published photo was..are you ready for this?..a three-legged
chicken.
Shot on the first roll of film I processed and printed myself, 1974. It ran
in a local weekly, but I don't remember whether I got paid. That was
shortly after getting my first SLR, too.
Brendan wrote:
Actually expect the prices to GO UP all those who
were dumping Pentax, are now going to jump back in and
buy stuff, watch our cameras and lenses increase in
value and ebay a sellers paradise for Pentax items.
Guess we'll agree to disagree here, Brendan.
If you owned a camera
Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do have the Modern Photo lens test results for Version 2, so
I'll dig 'em out and get back to you, if you want to add them to
your table.
Done. http://www.robertstech.com/temp/vivitar.htm
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Brendan wrote:
VAL when are you going to Visit Toronto :p
First, I'll have to decide under which pile of snow is my car. Then,
I'll have to shovel that white c**p off it. Several times, until I
manage to do it *before* the guy with the big road shovel covers it again.
And this kinda smells
That could be because the K2 is basically a paperweight with dead electronics
while the KX is still a useable camera.
At 09:26 AM 2/26/2003 -0500, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replying late to this! Sorry, but...
I'm likely going to be doing some extreme macro photography this summer
(in
It's a collectors item, It looks like a Leica to :D
--- Gary L. Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brendan wrote:
you know even with the new today, DAMN this is
tempting.
Help yourself... I think it's UGLY :-)
--
Later,
Gary
Peter Smekal wrote:
The same guy sold the Titanium LX. Where does he got this nice stuff from?
Good question... Maybe he has a contact inside Pentax?
Not so nice feedback though!
Yeah, and nothing as a seller
--
Later,
Gary
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to get one of these.has anyone on the list tested both
optically? Magazine test results suggest the Sigma is optically better,
consistently. Is this true? Help!
Haven't tried both lenses but I'm familiar enough with magazine tests in
general to know
Gary L. Murphy wrote:
So, what happens when the market is flooded by Pentax film bodies
because everyone is going digital? The price goes down.
Simple supply and demand.
I don't think there will be too many film bodies sold just because the D
came out. Considering the D price, there will be
First never park your car on the street, 2nd learn how
to probe for cars under snow piles, 3rd bribe the snow
plows to clear a path for your car ( jug of hot coffee
works well ) 4th Henrys, Oh please, We're taking you
to Aarons instead.
--- Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brendan
wrote:
1 - 100 of 288 matches
Mail list logo
