That's the paradox. You probably have not read H C Andersen :-)
Peter
If the Emperor of Digital Photography has no clothes, how can anyone
disrobe her?
Godfrey
Dear All,
To partly finance my move to digital, I want to sell my pentax gear:
Pentax Spotmatic F body
SMC Takumar screwmount lens: 1.4/50mm; 1.8/85mm; 4/100mm Macro; 4/200mm
All in good working condition.
Also available:
Vivitar 2.8/24mm lens;
Belarus-made MC Peleng 3.5/8mm fisheye circular lens
On the local (CBS) news tonight was coverage of the current
wave of attacks on the San Francisco homeless (some deranged
excrescence is taking pot-shots at them with a BB gun).
They interviewed a group of three homeless guys, one of whom
was wearing a set of rabbit ears which appeared to me to be
I second Shel, Aaaw.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello pentax-discuss,
I was needing to test the A 28-135/4 lens for suitability for some of
my wedding and portrait work. So I requested my 4 year old daughter
to help me out. She can be a ham at times, but is a good sport. I do
like the rendering this
Woohoo!! Guys and gals!! Remember our big ride across Australia that we are
doing for charity?? Well, after many late nights and lotsa teeth grinding,
the labour of love aka our new website is finally live as of about five
minutes ago!!
Please support us guys and girls, this is a huge thing that
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/14 Thu PM 11:10:40 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Hurrah for Shel Disrobing the Emperor
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 1:02 PM
Subject:
Good day!
Some of you might remember me griping about my wimpy tripod. Well I
didn't get one for my birthday (sigh) so I bit the bullet and built one
my self. Using scrap wood, Elmers glue, a few nuts and bolts, and some
elbow grease I managed to come up with something quite stable.
Ah.
The joys of nudism. :-)
HC Andersens fairytale is quite funny.
How anyone can cast up digital as some kind of regent in photographic
prints is beyond me. Shel has stated times again that his aim was
something a lot more modest than the language he used in his first
post pretended, so in the
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul, it's about economics, not quality.
Even more so in the consumer market, because you don't ever need to
have a picture printed again. Many, many people are happy with
viewing their pictures on the camera LCD. Add the ones who look at
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/15 Fri AM 03:29:32 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The Decline and Fall of the Photograph
Have faith Shel, things will get better better. The output from the
first photographic processes wasn't much to look at, but the
Nice job Francis!
You remind me of me, if I can't afford it, build it!
Actually I just get sick and tired of the crazy prices
some people charge for simple stuff and decide I can
do it better for less.
I'm usually wrong but it's fun anyway. ;-)
That Manly tripod just cries out for a manly
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/15 Fri AM 07:40:13 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: Hurrah for Shel Disrobing the Emperor
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul, it's about economics, not quality.
Even more so in the consumer
Based on my experience buying, using and selling these
cameras, the problem is usually PIT. Photographer
inducing trouble. The meter switching is weird. If
you press battery button the meter always responds
with a good battery but the meter does not work
until you pull out the wind lever
Sadly the KX meter is a one of a kind. I think you can use
Spotmatic F, K1000 and KM meters interchangeably
(I may be wrong about the KM). The KX was a whole other bird.
Damn!
John
Sadly the KX meter is a one of a kind. I think you can use Spotmatic F,
K1000 and KM meters interchangeably
(I may be wrong about the KM). The KX was a whole other bird.
You're right about all the above. The KX meter *was* unique. The K2 used
the same type silicon photo diode, but
For those of you using Rawshooter, they've posted an update. I couldn't
find the release notes, but I understand there isn't much changed except
support for the D2X. And it's still free.
I've been using it as my primary converter and love it, mostly because
it is so easy to batch process, and
Derby Chang wrote:
For those of you using Rawshooter, they've posted an update. I
couldn't find the release notes, but I understand there isn't much
changed except support for the D2X. And it's still free.
Oh, here's the what's new from the installation exe. That makes it more
worthwhile.
Meter?
Being metric, I have a light metre. It's about 3.34 nanoseconds.
Cheers,
- Dave (sorry... it's Friday)
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
On Apr 15, 2005, at 4:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sometimes startled when the person walking or standing next to me
suddenly
starts talking (often loudly) with no indication of who they are
talking to.
I've noticed that people always speak very loudly into cellphones.
Some even speak
On Apr 15, 2005, at 3:20 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
OK, so on your system I assume that files rendered as sRGB with and
without
profile look very similar on screen? So like anything it really comes
down to
knowing what you are doing, the generic colour settings in the Mac OS
aren't
necessarily
Bruce suggested a slightly wider crop, so here it is. I think he was right
about the pic needing a little more space. Thanks, Bruce!
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/convers3.html
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bruce Dayton
I do wish that I could see just a
bit more wall in front
Here's a list of my stuff on eBay today.
7508019862 Sigma 135/1.8 Sigmatel lens, (YS) Pentax-K
7508020464 Tokina 24-40/2.8 AT-X lens, Pentax-KA
7508024722 Tokina 17/3.5 RMC SL lens, M42
7508025396 Vivitar Series 1 35-85/2.8 VMC lens, M42
7508029226 Vivitar Series 1 90/2.5 VMC macro lens set, M42
Haven't seen anyone mention this yet.
http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/ja/info/20050415e.html
--
Peter Williams
even more (by a huge margin) stuff that's produced from film
in the labs stinks.
so?
mishka
On 4/14/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My objective was not to compare a wet print to a digital print. My
objective was exactly as stated: a lot of stuff that's produced digitally
and
On 4/14/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No I didn't ... show me where i said that. All I said was that the eleven
prints I examined were of poor quality and that the results were wildly
inconsistent, and cited an example of one list member's prints that looked
substantially
on 15-04-2005 12:47, Peter Williams at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haven't seen anyone mention this yet.
http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/ja/info/20050415e.html
What a beautiful translation - Download of Microsoft Mac OS Version
software - for all these who use Microsoft version of Mac OS ;-)
--
isn't worth much in way of a response
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Apr 15, 2005 12:20 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The Decline and Fall of the Photograph
All this fuss because someone didn't like a couple of prints
100%
If you give them away for nothing, to other than friends, then that's what
they're worth.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Apr 15, 2005 12:52 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: San Francisco Nighttime Panorama
On 4/15/05, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the local (CBS) news tonight was coverage of the current
wave of attacks on the San Francisco homeless (some deranged
excrescence is taking pot-shots at them with a BB gun).
They interviewed a group of three homeless guys, one of whom
was
Jostein wrote:
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul, it's about economics, not quality.
Even more so in the consumer market, because you don't ever need to
have a picture printed again. Many, many people are happy with
viewing their pictures on the camera LCD. Add the
On 4/15/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I was a kid and disobeyed my mom's orders, she'd often say that
talking to me was like talking to a wall. To my surprise, I found this
woman having a conversation with a wall ... or was she? Today one never
knows to whom or what people
On 4/15/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce suggested a slightly wider crop, so here it is. I think he was right
about the pic needing a little more space. Thanks, Bruce!
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/convers3.html
Absolutely!! Bruce's suggestion (and your execution
On 4/14/05, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank, spelling! Your photos are really pretty, and they're really good.
Of course they are. I was just joking around. vbg
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Based on my experience buying, using and selling these
cameras, the problem is usually PIT. Photographer
inducing trouble. The meter switching is weird. If
you press battery button the meter always responds
with a good battery but the meter does not work
until you pull out the wind lever
Sadly the KX meter is a one of a kind. I think you can use
Spotmatic F, K1000 and KM meters interchangeably
(I may be wrong about the KM). The KX was a whole other bird.
Damn!
John
--- End of Forwarded Message ---
John Whittingham
Technician
Sadly the KX meter is a one of a kind. I think you can use Spotmatic F,
K1000 and KM meters interchangeably
(I may be wrong about the KM). The KX was a whole other bird.
You're right about all the above. The KX meter *was* unique. The K2 used
the same type silicon photo diode, but
If that's not it then the power switch that closes
when the shutter release is pressed part way may not
be contacting and need a cleaning.
That would be under the top plate, yes?
John
Thans for the pointer!
Albano
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having now looked at the article in the bookstore, I
don't think it adds much
if anything to these materials I've already
collected from the Adobe site:
Digital Workflow for Raw Processing by Jeff Schewe
(four-part)
A Color
Yep, it is easier to send prints to grandma. It is easier to pass prints around
for your friends to look at. Prints are really the only reason slides and video
never became the mainstream snapshot media. Also, folks on this list, seem to
forget that 1/2 the people in this country do not own
Right!
Don
-Original Message-
From: John Whittingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 7:58 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Pentax KX meter problem
If that's not it then the power switch that closes
when the shutter release is pressed part
David,
You're forgiven. Pre-retirement, I remember Fridays as
being almost intoxicating. ;-))
Jack
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
From: Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/15 Fri PM 01:10:24 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Hurrah for Shel Disrobing the Emperor
Yep, it is easier to send prints to grandma. It is easier to pass prints
around for your friends to look at. Prints are really the only
Not getting personal at all ... I juust wouldn'rt expect you to see what
I'm talking about.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 4/15/2005 4:10:43 AM
Subject: Re: The Decline and Fall of the Photograph
On 4/14/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL
Time to dig out the old friction screwdriver then, looking on the brighter
side I think I've just enabled myself with a SMC Pentax (K) 135 f/2.5 :)
All the recent comment prompted me to bid one one with a K1000 body and 3rd
party 28mm 2.8. I've been looking for one for some time, but they hold
I'm a big movie fan, especially of certain older BW movies. I watch about
one a week. Last night I saw The Set-up directed by Robert Wise and
released in 1949. In its simplest form it's a boxing movie. I'd not seen
it before and so was very surprised to find that Weegee had a small role as
the
Just remember to keep telling yourself that Frank.
frank theriault wrote:
On 4/14/05, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank, spelling! Your photos are really pretty, and they're really good.
Of course they are. I was just joking around. vbg
cheers,
frank
--
I can understand why
I've never opened a KX but if it's like an MX it's under the bottom plate.
John Whittingham wrote:
If that's not it then the power switch that closes
when the shutter release is pressed part way may not
be contacting and need a cleaning.
That would be under the top plate, yes?
John
--
I
- Original Message -
From: Mishka Subject: Re: Hurrah for Shel Disrobing the Emperor
even more (by a huge margin) stuff that's produced from film
in the labs stinks.
so?
So you are a bad printer.
Thats all.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: Hurrah for Shel Disrobing the Emperor
The question that we want the answer to is What do most of the persons
in the street want out of photography? because they way forward for many
of us will be based on the companies'
Hi Bruce ...
Move the pic about in your browser window and see if losing about 1/2-inch
or so off the top gives the photo more impact. A few years ago I noticed
that the tops of heads were cut off in a lot of tight and medium head shots
in movies in order to strengthen an image. It's worth
I'm a city slicker Frank. I get a charge out of being around wild
animals. Even if it's just a little birdie. :-)
Glad you that you managed to stay awake long enough to fine a shot you liked g
Thanks for looking.
Dave S
On 4/15/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/11/05, David
I don't think that the powers that be take the total number of
computers sold and divide into the population. Estimates are done with
questionnaires and statistical extrapolation. (I wouldn't have any
computers at all since I build my own and use many cast off parts from
friends and clients
MX is different setup isnt it? MX you
don't need to pull out the wind lever no?
jco
-Original Message-
From: John Whittingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 8:55 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Pentax KX meter problem (resend)
Based on my
I've never opened a KX but if it's like an MX it's under the bottom plate.
Oh please let it be under the bottom plate, it would make life much
simpler.
John
http://www.pentaximaging.com/footer/news_media_article?ArticleId=6458800
GOLDEN, CO (March 15, 2005)PENTAX Imaging Company has announced that PENTAX
Corporation will unveil the first PENTAX 645 Digital medium-format camera at
the Photo Imaging Expo (PIE) from March 1720, 2005 in Tokyo. This
I took a few, but let's talk about one in particular.
Lens cap in place, and covering eyepiece with my thumb
Exposure 8 sec
ISO 1600
Format RAW
Noise reduction off.
I looked at the histogram of the PEF file in PhotoshopCS
The lightest pixel was at level 80; 99th percentile was 26.
I ran a
http://www.pentaximaging.com/footer/news_media_article?ArticleId=6458799
GOLDEN, CO (March 15, 2005)...PENTAX Imaging Company has announced yet another
compact, lightweight, interchangeable zoom lens for exclusive use with PENTAX
digital SLR cameras including the *ist D and the *ist DS digital
MX is different setup isnt it? MX you
don't need to pull out the wind lever no?
IIRC you do if you want the meter to stay on, I never think when I'm using
the MX it's like an extension of my mind and body, I'd have to check that.
John
Strange. All my non-photographer friends who shoot occasional snaps are more
than happy with digital. My kids, who never could be bothered with film, are
happily snapping away with digital. They e-mail a lot of pics and print a few.
It works for them. Seems to work for almost everyone I know.
Duh - sorry, bit late here...
Been too busy with work for the list lately!
-Original Message-
From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 April 2005 15:48
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: FIRST PENTAX 645 DIGITAL TO BE UNVEILED AT TOKYO TRADE SHOW
I know.
John Whittingham wrote:
I've never opened a KX but if it's like an MX it's under the bottom plate.
Oh please let it be under the bottom plate, it would make life much
simpler.
John
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive
Hi Don
No disrespect, are you sure it's under the top plate?
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:25:58 -0500
Subject: RE: Pentax KX meter problem
Right!
Don
-Original Message-
On 15 Apr 2005 at 10:39, Alan P. Hayes wrote:
I was a little surprised by this. I'll run through it again with a
fresh exposure when I get a chance
PC CS RAW has integrated compensation for over-exposure so don't be too
surprised. You're best off using a camera generated TIFF file for
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 15 Apr 2005 at 10:39, Alan P. Hayes wrote:
I was a little surprised by this. I'll run through it again with a
fresh exposure when I get a chance
PC CS RAW has integrated compensation for over-exposure so don't be too
surprised. You're best off using a camera generated
On 15 Apr 2005 at 8:11, David Oswald wrote:
Hmm, camera generated TIFF files if only the *ist-DS could do that.
A minimum compression jpg will suffice :-)
I forgot.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just picked up a Vivitar Series 1 70-210/3.5 constant aperture zoom on ebay.
$95 buy it now. It wasn't advertised as a Series 1, but the pictures reveal
that it is exactly that.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=48558item=7508644266rd=1
Hello,
Can anyone help me to decide if I would benefit from a correction
lens in my 6x7 eyepiece? (It's a 6x7 MLU with plain prism).
On my LX I have the FA-1 set to mid-range, so assuming a linear
scale that's about -0.75 diopters. This is the viewing experience
that I would like to duplicate
On 15 Apr 2005 at 14:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange. All my non-photographer friends who shoot occasional snaps are more
than happy with digital. My kids, who never could be bothered with film, are
happily snapping away with digital. They e-mail a lot of pics and print a few.
It works
Do you get more accurate colors, better sharpness and shadow/highlight detail
with Capture One than with Adobe RAW converter ? Or
the difference is only in speed, ease of use, etc..
What justifies the price of Capture One Pro ?
I've used both.
Capture One Pro has the edge with batch processing. That's something that
you can't do with Adobe RAW.
So, if the shots are under similar conditions and you have a lot of them,
you can basically set your parameters up on the first image in Capture One
and transfer those
I'll give that a try. I've got access to a PC right now so I may be
able to try the program you've mentioned.
Of course the question is, If you can't see 'em, does it matter?
I'll run something from the C5050 through it, too. Too bad the
coolpix doesn't do RAW, I can always recognize low key
It seems to be my morning for reporting miraculous events.
I just finished running through the second set of emergency alkaline
batteries that I'd mentioned in an earlier post. These were the
eveready E2 titanium alkalines. I appear to have gotten about 350
frames per set. I'm going to play
No. ;-)
I'm pretty sure it is but I don't have a KX to check.
Sometimes I don't remember so good. :-/
Considering the bottom plate comes off in about 15
seconds that would certainly be the first place to check.
You have to get under the bottom to check out the wiring
anyway.
Don
-Original
Yeah, that's better. Ensures that I know she is talking to the wall.
Very nice photo!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, April 15, 2005, 2:36:46 AM, you wrote:
SB Bruce suggested a slightly wider crop, so here it is. I think he was right
SB about the pic needing a little more space. Thanks,
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Ann, I've had an SF1 since 1988 have run thousands of rolls thru it. Still
have it but since I got the MZ-S *ist D, it doesn't get much use. It did
require a little maintained, but given the usage I believe it has performed
well. Built like a tank. Doesn't have all
Hello Shel,
I have tried your suggestion and cropped some off the top and the
bottom. I do believe the image is improved. Here is the new crop:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_1790a.htm
Here is the original:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_1790.htm
Thanks for the suggestion.
--
Best
Har! The noise was from a corner of the flexible circuit board
inside catching on a screw head when you focused.
A dab of contact cement and no more noise.
This thing's built like a tank! I'm surprised it had any
mechanical problems at all. All brass gears, very few plastic
parts. After a CLA it
Did Camera RAW for PS 7 ever do Pentax PEF files?
I was told by Adobe support that it did, but I can't confirm it. It was the
same guy that told me before I purchased PS 7.0 last August, that I could get
the plug in from Adobe - since confirmed as not true.
Kenneth Waller
-Original
I know I couldn't get half as much work done per day if I had to work with 8
year old hardware.
I guess it depends on what you want/expect your system to do. My 8 year old
system is only used for photoshop.
I know I will/should update but at the moment its hard to justify.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Steve Morphet Subject: 6x7 Eyepiece Correction Lenses
Hello,
Can anyone help me to decide if I would benefit from a correction
lens in my 6x7 eyepiece? (It's a 6x7 MLU with plain prism).
On my LX I have the FA-1 set to mid-range, so assuming a linear
scale
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert Subject: Re: Re: Hurrah for Shel Disrobing the Emperor
On 15 Apr 2005 at 14:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange. All my non-photographer friends who shoot occasional snaps are
more
than happy with digital. My kids, who never could be bothered
Don, it is scheduled to appear in June. If history is any guide it will be in
Europe well before it is available in the U.S. Here's a couple of recent
comparisons:
DA 14 appeared in Europe last June. I got mine in October.
DA 40 appeared in Europe in January. I got mine yesterday.
So most
I think I like it!!
OK, for $45.00 shipped, I love it!
http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/Sigma24_2.8.htm
Don
Thanks Joe, I'll try to be patient. ;-/
don
-Original Message-
From: jtainter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 12:00 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: DA 50-200/4-5.6 ED, Any news?
Don, it is scheduled to appear in June. If history is any
You can batch process with the PSCS Raw Converter. Just dial in the first shot,
choose those settings as your default and fire off the rest of them. Simple and
efficient.
Paul
I've used both.
Capture One Pro has the edge with batch processing. That's something that
you can't do with Adobe
I'm not sure about here, but I do recall a few people mentioning that
they've either returned to film or are using more film rather than shooting
all digital. Of course, that changes nothing: crap is crap, good work is
still good work, and digital is going to be around a long time. I'd just
like
No. ;-)
I'm pretty sure it is but I don't have a KX to check.
Sometimes I don't remember so good. :-/
Considering the bottom plate comes off in about 15
seconds that would certainly be the first place to check.
You have to get under the bottom to check out the wiring
anyway.
Cheers Don, my
I think I like it!!
OK, for $45.00 shipped, I love it!
Very nice the 24mm manual focus version was and still is one of my favourite
lenses.
John
William Robb wrote:
Minilabs are doomed anyway.
Print counts from digital won't keep them open, and while I
am seeing a blip
at the moment, I am sure that is all it is.
As much as i would like it to be otherwise
The bulk of the people I mix with are camera owners and make no pretence of
One thing that I've noticed that surprised me is that the LEG (one of the
Leica lists) has a substantial number of photographers shooting more
digital than I'd have expected, and from what I can see, the cameras of
choice are Canon and ... Pentax! Canon has been chosen because a lot of
Leica
You forgot to mention, iti's also macro-focusing! Very nice find indeed!
keith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just picked up a Vivitar Series 1 70-210/3.5 constant aperture zoom on ebay.
$95 buy it now. It wasn't advertised as a Series 1, but the pictures reveal
that it is exactly that.
Shel opined:
More and more I'm seeing flower pictures
Shel! It's Spring! Get out there and smell the roses vbg. Seriously, for
those of us in northern climes that may well be a seasonal phenomenon.
Would
some photogs be choosing their subjects and framing with a better eye
towards
Yes, you're right. A good flower shooter vbg. I'm looking forward to playing
with it.
You forgot to mention, iti's also macro-focusing! Very nice find indeed!
keith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just picked up a Vivitar Series 1 70-210/3.5 constant aperture zoom on
ebay.
$95 buy
Many up load problems last night, connection kept crashing,but here is the site
i
made,about 3/4 loaded
up.
go to:
http://www.caughtinmotion.com\paecwinter\index.htm for the page itself. Just
delete the
index and
folder to get to ,main page.
The problem: No file numbers in larger pictuyre
I
On Fri Apr 15 16:32 , 'William Robb' [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
Find out from your optometrist what your glasses correction is, and try to
find a diopter in the same range.
Thanks Bill. I will pay them a visit tomorrow and see what they can do.
I'm sure they'll be able to find me something that
It wasn't advertised as a Series 1, but the pictures reveal that it is
exactly that.
Yes, indeed. It's the original version of the VS1 70-210/3.5. A sturdy
classic...
Fred
On Apr 15, 2005, at 8:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David Zaninovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you get more accurate colors, better sharpness and shadow/highlight
detail with Capture One than with Adobe RAW converter ? Or
the difference is only in speed, ease of use, etc..
What justifies the
That's most of what I use my desktop computer for too, other than
noodling about in these forums and such. I want [EMAIL PROTECTED] editing,
so Photoshop 7 is only really half-way there for me, and such editing
takes a lot of system power and resources.
Godfrey
On Apr 15, 2005, at 9:51 AM,
So why does the Capture One Pro costs almost as much as the whole Photoshop ?
:)
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: Capture One Pro vs Adobe RAW converter
On Apr 15, 2005, at
Ok.
So I'm obviously not using my Photoshop CS as much as I used to since using
Capture One.
Personally.. that's my preference currently - as to why - well.. maybe
because I had used it back when I had the 10D and Photoshop never offered
an integrated RAW converter before CS (it was offered as a
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
