Quite a good gallery, Godfrey. Good conversions.
-Brendan
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Working my way through the photos I made in SF on
Friday, I put
together a small set of 12 BW renderings.
http://www.gdgphoto.com/sfstreet/
Comments, critique and thoughts
Gotta get a big lens.
-Brendan
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
K10D, 600mmFA f4.0, 1/160, f4.0, 400 ISO on Gitzo
1548 tripod with Kirk King
Cobra Head.
Comments appreciated.
Kenneth Waller
--
On May 7, 2007, at 6:19 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
I went shooting with my spiffy new K10D on Sunday.
The old Philadelphia Waterworks on the banks of the
Schuylkill River have been restored, and this is one
view.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5942460
This shot used none of the
Hello!
Congratulations to the family.
Nice photo too! :-)
Godfrey
On May 7, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
Say hello to Finn Christopher MacRae. Born on Cinco de
Mayo @ 15:57PST.
http://www.primelensphoto.com/finn.jpg
7lbs 6.4 oz, 21 inches long. My wife really had no
pain
Congratulations!!! He's looking great and a very beautiful name
Toine
On 5/7/07, Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Say hello to Finn Christopher MacRae. Born on Cinco de
Mayo @ 15:57PST.
http://www.primelensphoto.com/finn.jpg
7lbs 6.4 oz, 21 inches long. My wife really had no
pain
In a message dated 5/7/2007 9:50:54 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, theoretically it is indeed an improvement. But I have both opened
and when I swap between them all I have to say is Bad Marnie, Bad, bad
Marnie ;-).
Boris
===
ROLF.
Marnie aka the Bad
On May 8, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Christian wrote:
Here's another olive sparrow; bathing.
http://tinyurl.com/24qpmd
That's fantastic.
- Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Yesterday I was searching for spectacular colorful flowers like
orchids and went home with these little white blossoms:
http://leende.net/peso/20070506
istD, M100/4 macro
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Yes, I see that now. That's *my* main problem with candids. Further, I
usually don't notice things such as this one. So we're on the same
page here, in a certain sense.
On 5/8/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman
Subject: Re: PESO: Listen
Having high cholesterol levels in my blood, I actually tend to eat
less meat than I used. I ain't no vegetarian yet, but I don't insist
on eating meat either.
On 5/8/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You must be a vegetarian.
That roll of toilet paper is actually part of a leg bone from
On May 7, 2007, at 11:20 PM, Peter Lacus wrote:
16.5. Christchurch
Arriving at 8am. After some 26 hours spent in planes we'll probably
rest. We also need to buy some food, mobile phone pay-as-you-go
package
and most importantly familiarize ourself with the left side of the
road
driving
Thanks - that one's my favourite.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Womer
Sent: 08 May 2007 02:51
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Green Man and Pig's Head
Very nice, especially the maypole one (top right).
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/05/07 Mon PM 10:13:27 GMT
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Green Man and Pig's Head
The sun comes out for about 5 minutes, and all the heathens rush out
to conduct their foul pagan rituals:
Wonderful photo - I really like it.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Christian
Sent: 08 May 2007 03:18
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO - another olive sparrow
Ok, last one... for a while :-) I'm catching a
Never heard of the green man. What is that all about?
the Green Man is a traditional figure representing the force of Nature
and spring, I think. Probably pre-Christian but it is carved into a
lot of churches here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Man
There was one carved in the parish
Excellent!
Toine
On 5/8/07, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, last one... for a while :-) I'm catching a plane back home tomorrow.
Here's another olive sparrow; bathing.
http://tinyurl.com/24qpmd
Same setup but no flash. We were getting set to leave the blind and had
dismantled
Another baby picture, but I can only claim the photo credit for this one!
http://tinyurl.com/ywo5p5
Technical stuff on the page
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Ditto on the maypole. The foreground figures give it dimension and
interest. Like the pig's head as well. Yumm!
Paul
On May 7, 2007, at 9:51 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Very nice, especially the maypole one (top right).
Rick
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The sun comes out for about 5
Much better. Just superb.
Paul
On May 7, 2007, at 11:55 PM, Christian wrote:
Maris V. Lidaka Sr. wrote:
Well done! Now it is a sparrow rather than being crossed with a
cardinal.
Image is sharp including the feathers. And I like the closer crop
- on 2nd
viewing of the original, the
They don't build 'em like that anymore! Modern design would call for something
purely functional with aesthetics being of little or no concern (or do I just
sound like a grumpy old man)
Anyway excellent shot. With the variation of lighting on those columns,
this might also look great
Actually, there should have been a smily at the end.
Sorry
Dave
On 5/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 5/6/2007 4:33:06 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
but.
Is this still a photograph.
Removing a tree to enhance a subject matter.
Hi gang.
Well last night was the first of 5 lighting/portrait classes in
Barrie. Long day as i was in the field until 5:30 then a made dash to
the school. Took a while to find everything, but we did.
As i walked in to the class room, one gent in the class was raving
about his new digital
David J Brooks wrote:
Hi gang.
Well last night was the first of 5 lighting/portrait classes in
Barrie. Long day as i was in the field until 5:30 then a made dash to
the school. Took a while to find everything, but we did.
As i walked in to the class room, one gent in the class was raving
Yes, and pseudphidrine is, supposedly, used in the manufacture of crack.
Hence in North Carolina, at least, it is a semi-controlled substance.
You do not need a prescription, but it is kept behind the Rx counter and
you are only allowed to buy 3 packs a year (I see nothing keeping you
from
Hey Bob,
Looks like a fun time. This one is without a doubt my favorite in the
set ...
http://www.web-options.com/Mayday/content/_5075226_large.html
I could see it rendered in BW too.
Godfrey
On May 8, 2007, at 12:19 AM, Bob W wrote:
The sun comes out for about 5 minutes, and all the
Thanks, Brian. I was thinking about that, but I enjoy
the warmth of the light. There are a few others from
the same shoot that I might try converting, though.
Rick
--- Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They don't build 'em like that anymore! Modern
design would call for something
Thanks, Godfrey. The exposure was 1/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/16, my last
beer was with lunch 5 hours earlier, and I hadn't had
any caffeine, so even the anti-shake didn't have much
to do!
On other shots, though, it has worked =very= nicely.
The camera generally handles wonderfully.
Rick
---
Thanks for the compliment! People around here might
quibble about =anything= being a step up from an LX,
though...
Rick
--- Bob Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't need fancy features to take a great
photo!
I too, have been learning the new features.
Quite a step up from a LX!
In a message dated 5/8/2007 5:16:55 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, there should have been a smily at the end.
Sorry
Dave
===
Nevermind. Mine had a smiley.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
-
Warning: I am now
In a message dated 5/8/2007 12:51:41 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the Green Man is a traditional figure representing the force of Nature
and spring, I think. Probably pre-Christian but it is carved into a
lot of churches here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Man
John Coyle wrote:
Another baby picture, but I can only claim the photo credit for this one!
http://tinyurl.com/ywo5p5
Technical stuff on the page
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
That's a very sweet photo... aww.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML
Nicely done. It's tough to find a good angle for a shot like this. You did it
well.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, Godfrey. The exposure was 1/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/16, my last
beer was with lunch 5 hours earlier, and I
Bob W wrote:
Wonderful photo - I really like it.
--
Bob
Thanks, Bob. I'm really happy with it too.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
http://tinyurl.com/24qpmd
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Brendan MacRae wrote:
Really nice shot, Christian. You nailed it. Very
interesting pose for him, too.
Thanks, Brendan. I really like the pose too.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
http://tinyurl.com/362cen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Much better. Just superb.
Paul
Thanks a bunch. Paul.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Toine wrote:
Excellent!
Toine
Thanks!
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
http://tinyurl.com/24qpmd
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
David Mann wrote:
On May 8, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Christian wrote:
Here's another olive sparrow; bathing.
http://tinyurl.com/24qpmd
That's fantastic.
Thanks, Dave. The guy in the blind with me (whom I shot with all 3
days) had a 1DMkIIn and was machine gunning the little guy at 8fps. I
Yes i will.
Both good ones and what i think are bad ones.
I'd like to get feedback on those.
Dave
On 5/8/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
Hi gang.
Well last night was the first of 5 lighting/portrait classes in
Barrie. Long day as i was in the field
Hello List
A friend of mine needs to repair an old M 2.8/28mm lens.
Some years ago someone here posted photographs about repairing/taking apart
the old Pentax lenses - like K, M or A-lenses.
Would these instructions still be available somewhere on the www, please?
Regards
Jens Bladt
Anyone ver tryied one?
This one doesn't look too bad at all:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157600191710910/
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.5/793 - Release Date:
Hi Troops
The fellow in class that had the K10D last night, has the newer Sigma
500 DG super, and he has trouble getting the wireless mode/flash to
work properly.Major under exposures.
So am i.
Is this now a dead issue with the DG super, and K10D in that wireless is kaput.
If so, i quess the
My DG Super is at Sigma now getting upgraded. Stay
tuned.
Rick
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Troops
The fellow in class that had the K10D last night,
has the newer Sigma
500 DG super, and he has trouble getting the
wireless mode/flash to
work properly.Major under
Thanks, Paul. Yes, it's a difficult place to shoot.
There seem to be either parked cars in the foreground
or various architectural distractions in the
background from most vantage points.
Rick
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicely done. It's tough to find a good angle for a
shot like this.
I gave up on the Sigma. Too many problems. And it quit working completely when
I tried it on the K10D. I guess I should send it in, although it's probably off
warranty. I bought the Pentax 540. Works great. And I've now added the external
battery pack. It's a good unit.
Paul
--
Paul, is this on, and off camera?Wireless modes to.
Is the 360 the only model that does not offer swivel positions. The
500 and 540 do, correct.
Dave
On 5/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I gave up on the Sigma. Too many problems. And it quit working completely
when I tried
On 5/8/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My DG Super is at Sigma now getting upgraded. Stay
tuned.
Waiting with worms on my tongue.:-)
Dave
Rick
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Troops
The fellow in class that had the K10D last night,
has the newer Sigma
500
What? Is Godfrey in a 3rd grade photography? :-) Sorry to appear rude.
What is good about this picture? I don't find anything appealing about it.
I don't see that it took any more effort than haphazardly raising the camera
to one's eye and pressing the shutter release, maybe not even
She's a restauranteur:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=6Q6hFkxnjN
And a lovely restaurant it is, too...
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 5/7/2007 3:29:20 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hula Hanks. You've got to love a club that can convince random members
of the clientèle to become part of the entertainment. How? It could
have been the drinks, two martinis and I felt that I'd been
frank theriault wrote:
She's a restauranteur:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=6Q6hFkxnjN
And a lovely restaurant it is, too...
HAR! My ex would own/operate Stupid, Disrespectful, Insane Bitch's if
there was such a restaurant...
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I gave up on the Sigma. Too many problems. And it quit working
completely when I tried it on the K10D. I guess I should send it in,
although it's probably off warranty.
Sigma updated my EF500 free, even though it was long out of warranty.
I bought the Pentax 540.
Rick Womer wrote:
I went shooting with my spiffy new K10D on Sunday.
The old Philadelphia Waterworks on the banks of the
Schuylkill River have been restored, and this is one
view.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5942460
This shot used none of the camera's neat features; I
Charles Robinson wrote:
On May 8, 2007, at 10:10, Jens Bladt wrote:
Hello List
A friend of mine needs to repair an old M 2.8/28mm lens.
Some years ago someone here posted photographs about repairing/
taking apart
the old Pentax lenses - like K, M or A-lenses.
Would these instructions
One of the most unusual bird shots I have ever seen. That's an UNUSUAL
compliment ;-)
Or is it? Anyway, thanks Marnie.
Me puting a picture together from three shots? You got to be kidding ;-)
I'm not able to edit one shot properly in PS.
Seriuosly. To see a young Seagul next to a Eurasian
On May 8, 2007, at 10:10, Jens Bladt wrote:
Hello List
A friend of mine needs to repair an old M 2.8/28mm lens.
Some years ago someone here posted photographs about repairing/
taking apart
the old Pentax lenses - like K, M or A-lenses.
Would these instructions still be available somewhere
A very fine show Jens. What's the music, it reminds me of Phillip Cathrine?
Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 9:03 AM
Subject: DESO: Apples
Pklease take a look at my
My Sigma doesn't work at all any more. I think something popped when I tried to
use it on the K10D. It had already been upgraded for the K 100D, so I figured
it would be okay. I don't know how the 540 Pentax differs from the 360, other
than it has more range. The 500 won't work on the K10D.
I like the idea in this photo a lot. What I would like to see is a
bit more separation between the foreground bird and its surroundings.
You might be able to do that with a little bit of careful image
processing work.
Godfrey
On May 7, 2007, at 11:38 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
I've already
Though I don't get along with my ex either, IMHO this is going a bit too
far.
Maris
Christian wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
She's a restauranteur:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=6Q6hFkxnjN
And a lovely restaurant it is, too...
HAR! My ex would own/operate Stupid,
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=49fYIPjFnN
I actually focused on the prancing horse on the mirror, but it still
came out blurry. I guess it's the lens, being soft off-centre or
something. Can't be my (or the camera's) focusing, right?
;-)
Comments welcome.
cheers,
frank
--
I'm going to send the Sigma in for an upgrade. However, I think something is
broken. It won't flash at all.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I gave up on the Sigma. Too many problems. And it quit working
At least two viewers. Frank and I both said we liked it. I find it quite
fascinating. The juxtaposition of the person and the dog adds interest. The
jacket that separates the two is sharply in focus, as the head and the dog
become slightly softer background and foreground elements. Social
The was, in some unique way, especially meaningful to one viewer. That
doesn't, necessarily, validate it to anyone else.
I think that's what every photographer and viewer has to realize.
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What? Is Godfrey in a 3rd grade photography? :-) Sorry to appear
If it were my daughter I'd be a bit disappointed in her...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 5/7/2007 3:29:20 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hula Hanks. You've got to love a club that can convince random members
of the clientèle to become part of the
My pleasure. This was all a construction site at the
time of the Philly PDML. We may have to hold another
one someday...
--- Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for posting this, Rick. Architecture like
this fascinates me,
and you've done a good job photographing it.
--
On 5/8/07, Maris V. Lidaka Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though I don't get along with my ex either, IMHO this is going a bit too
far.
I hope you didn't find this insulting, Maris.
I actually don't get along so badly with my ex. I'm just having fun
with my friends (on this list).
cheers,
Way to go :-)
Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless
- Original Message -
From: Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 11:16 PM
Subject: PESO - It's a boy!
Say hello to Finn Christopher MacRae. Born on Cinco de
Mayo @ 15:57PST.
I stipulate that we both saw the same image. Far as I'm concerned,
you're under no obligation to attempt to justify your reaction.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At least two viewers. Frank and I both said we liked it. I find it
quite fascinating. The juxtaposition of the person and the dog
frank theriault wrote:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=49fYIPjFnN
I actually focused on the prancing horse on the mirror, but it still
came out blurry. I guess it's the lens, being soft off-centre or
something. Can't be my (or the camera's) focusing, right?
;-)
Comments
let me help you out there Frank...
http://bp0.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RkBpjwA3C7I/AQ0/ZBUC62cjluY/s400/april_30+067.jpg
CW
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 1:33 PM
Subject: PESO -
Ok, that's not the first time recently that this has happened but Frank's
initial post didn't have a link when it got to my computer.
Just forget I said anything
CW
- Original Message -
From: drew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007
Granted, everyone has their own taste and I can't, nor do I want to, change
that. However, I and several others tend to find the list is often too
self-congratulatory.
Almost every single photo shown here meets with praise. That tends to
diminish the value of truly well-deserved praise, and
Hi Tom,
Let me start saying, that without getting into the story that came
with the image (which lifts the image into a different arena) and
speaking strictly about the photographic properties of the image, even
though I understand the appeal of the photograph and I like (I repeat,
I like) the
Congratulations!!!
May he live long and prosper life and shoot some Pentax ;-).
Boris
Brendan MacRae wrote:
Say hello to Finn Christopher MacRae. Born on Cinco de
Mayo @ 15:57PST.
http://www.primelensphoto.com/finn.jpg
7lbs 6.4 oz, 21 inches long. My wife really had no
pain meds. This
Humm.
I checked on Pentax Canada and Henrys cameras, and i cannot see
anything that indicates the 360 does or does not swivel. It says it
does bounce, but i like the 180 swivel feature my Nikon SB 80DX has,
including the 90 degree bounce.
Can those who have the 360 and or 540 confirm which one
The 360 does not swivel, just flip up 90*. That is why I want the 540 as
well. It has a rebate going right now, but I don't know if that is Canada
also.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thank you.
As I've stated several times. Me and PS don't get along very well.
But I think I'm open to suggestions...
Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 6:50 PM
Paul,
I'll speak my mind and hope you don't take offense, because none is
intended. You and Frank seem to like almost every single photo that's
shown. Maybe you're just two terrifically positive individuals. :-)
To some though, it may come across as undiscriminating. When my son was 2
or 3
I didn't say to use Photoshop... I said to do image processing. There
*are* other tools.
Although, frankly, I would suggest getting over your phobia by buying
a book and reading, understanding. Nothing kills a phobia so quickly
as understanding. ;-)
G
On May 8, 2007, at 11:37 AM, Tim
I generally don't comment on photos I don't like. That's why my responses
weight heavily on the plus side. And if you're paying attention, you'll notice
that when I do comment, I frequently offer a suggestion. If someone really
wants a thumbs up or thumbs down, I always reply honestly. I gave
Ahh yes, the freedom to be intolerant. ;-)
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re:
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 18:57:54 +
I generally don't comment on photos I don't like. That's why my
On May 8, 2007, at 10:33 AM, frank theriault wrote:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=49fYIPjFnN
I actually focused on the prancing horse on the mirror, but it still
came out blurry. I guess it's the lens, being soft off-centre or
something. Can't be my (or the camera's) focusing,
In a message dated 5/8/2007 6:54:00 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Everything not prohibited is mandatory! The only reason drugs were
made illegal in the US is because good old J Edgar Hoover blackmailed
them into making them illegal so he would not have to disband
I don't think that this is a masterpiece, I do understand why some ppl
like it and why some don't.
Peace.
On 5/8/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Fernando,
You're right. I'm not a street photographer and do not aspire to be. I
have found some photography in the genre to be very
On 8/5/07, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
Almost every single photo shown here meets with praise.
That's because a lot of people here won't comment on pics that don't do
anything for them. Me included. Policy.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On 8/5/07, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
What? Is Godfrey in a 3rd grade photography? :-) Sorry to appear rude.
What is good about this picture? I don't find anything appealing about it.
I don't see that it took any more effort than haphazardly raising the camera
to one's eye and
The AF360FGZ unit only has simple vertical movement for bounce.
The AF540FGZ unit has both swivel and vertical movements.
Check them out on the BH website: a much more succinct and
informative delineation of features and specifications than on the
Pentax site.
I would not buy a flash of this
Hi Fernando,
You're right. I'm not a street photographer and do not aspire to be. I
have found some photography in the genre to be very appealing, however,
including one of Godfrey's exhibited here a year or so ago. It was of an
older genteel lady, sitting up sleeping on a bench. I thought
I'm with you here Tom. I looked at the link and thought blah,
flat-line. But maybe other people see something that stirs some
emotion? I just dont know.
On 5/8/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Fernando,
You're right. I'm not a street photographer and do not aspire to be. I
have
congratulation Brendan!
On 5/7/07, Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Say hello to Finn Christopher MacRae. Born on Cinco de
Mayo @ 15:57PST.
http://www.primelensphoto.com/finn.jpg
7lbs 6.4 oz, 21 inches long. My wife really had no
pain meds. This wasn't her choice, there just wasn't
On 8/5/07, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
Almost every single photo shown here meets with praise.
That's because a lot of people here won't comment on pics that don't do
anything for them. Me included. Policy.
Cheers,
Cotty
That's my general policy also. It seems a disparity exists
On 5/8/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Focusing errors are never the photographer's fault. ]'-)
Not with the crutch of AF...
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 5/8/2007 6:54:00 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Everything not prohibited is mandatory! The only reason drugs were
made illegal in the US is because good old J Edgar Hoover blackmailed
them into making them illegal so he
Almost every single photo shown here meets with praise.
That's because a lot of people here won't comment on pics
that don't do
anything for them. Me included. Policy.
Cheers,
Cotty
That's my general policy also. It seems a disparity exists
as to how the
policy is
Yeah. I've heared about books ;-)
I have one about Elements, Elements in a snap. Total crap, written by a
computer geek. A lot details, but nothing giving me a general understanding.
A lot of how's, but no why's.
Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Hello Gonz,
This is a long held belief, and I'm sure some will differ.
When we see a disadvantaged person, any one not totally calloused will feel
a degree of empathy for that individual and their plight. That's a natural
emotion and a good one. I've seen so many photos displayed here of
Adam Maas wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 5/8/2007 6:54:00 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Everything not prohibited is mandatory! The only reason drugs were
made illegal in the US is because good old J Edgar Hoover blackmailed
them into
Thanks Cotty - good reply. I'm hoping to photograph some of the wacky
goings-on in Dorset around Midsummer, so there should be plenty of
ambient light, but I want to be sure I get the gnarled faces of the
peasantry as well as the burning torches.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From:
Point taken. I did give reasons for my reaction.
Yes, most of the time a non-reaction from myself means I did not feel
compelled for one reason or another.
Tom C.
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
On 5/8/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
By stating that you only comment on pictures you like, you appear to
be saying that if you don't comment, you don't like the picture - so
you are apparently commenting implicitly! Of course, this is a
fallacy, but one that many people would commit.
1 - 100 of 252 matches
Mail list logo
