You can still get Duratrans or Endura Transparancy prints. A 16x20 runs about
$50 plus whatever back-light system you choose.
On 9/29/2017 10:34, P. J. Alling wrote:
I haven't read the claims in the posts you linked yet, but, this really puts me
in mind of, is when we could print on clear
in the case of my painting on glass, the painting was done on the back side
of the glass.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
> John,
>
> If I understood you correctly, you are assuming the
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 02:12:41PM -0400, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
> John,
>
> If I understood you correctly, you are assuming the photo is printed on the
> front surface of the glass. My understanding is that it is printed on the
> back surface of the glass. So, in principle, you have the same
John,
If I understood you correctly, you are assuming the photo is printed on
the front surface of the glass. My understanding is that it is printed on
the back surface of the glass. So, in principle, you have the same number
of surfaces to reflect from, as in case of a photo behind the
have another look even if you aren't buying the book... there are three
calendars too and I don't make anymore money
from the books than the calendars.
IF you have already decided to buy but just ahvent done it yet I'd be
most grateful if you can do it today or tomorrow.. so it will come to me
absolutely agree -- and always look forward to you efforts..
(of course if you are just needing an excuse for being lazy... well,
what can I say?)
ann
On 9/29/2017 10:40 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Don,
There's nothing that says you can't post here if it wasn't shot with a
Pentax. You just
I comment even less than PJ, but like he said "I like your stuff". Post
away!!
-p
On 9/29/2017 9:40 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Don,
There's nothing that says you can't post here if it wasn't shot with a
Pentax. You just need Pentax branded gear if you post to the PUG. My
opinion holds no
I have never had a photo printed on glass, but someone did a painting of my
airplane on glass, and it was a very effective presentation.
Dan
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:34 AM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> I
Don,
There's nothing that says you can't post here if it wasn't shot with a
Pentax. You just need Pentax branded gear if you post to the PUG. My
opinion holds no weight beyond my keyboard, but it's my opinion that you
should feel free to share. Heck, I don't comment much but I like your
I haven't read the claims in the posts you linked yet, but, this really
puts me in mind of, is when we could print on clear Cibachrome
materials. You display these prints back lighted and a well done print,
with the proper subject matter, was like looking at a giant color slide
on a giant
10 matches
Mail list logo