Dan, I think you documented the Painted Lady saga very well. This species,
Vanessa Cardui, is one of the few completely international butterflies,
certainly the best known. Perhaps you are on the verge of a focus stacking
adventure?
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Daniel J. Matyola
An empty chrysalis after the butterfly has emerged:
http://dan-matyola.squarespace.com/danmatyolas-pesos/2017/11/14/vacant
K-5 IIs, FA 100 mm Macro F 2.8
Comments are appreciated.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thanks, Larry.
Yes, that is a limit of SquareSpace.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> > On Nov 15, 2017, at 6:16 AM, Daniel J. Matyola
> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you, Jack
On 11/15/2017 16:47, Larry Colen wrote:
My friend Candice ccmo...@pacbell.net asked me about photoshop cc, and when I
asked why she said:
I'm looking for reviews from people I know, because Brett wants to upgrade and
just about everyone I know is still using CS5/CS6 and have pretty much
On 11/15/2017 09:11, Jack Davis wrote:
Attempted to post this yesterday, but fumbled the URL.
Posted a shot of one of these sometime ago, but like this
scene and the red eye.
C?
Thanks,
J
https://www.photo.net/photo/18436241
I saw your post yesterday, and had no problem with the URL.
--
Yes, it sure does look better.
Well done, Alan!
J
- Original Message -
From: "Alan C"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 7:02:30 PM
Subject: Re: PESOx2: Egyptian Goose
Jack, I re-worked it. Looks better.
Jack, I re-worked it. Looks better.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/wisselstroom/26671595419/
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Jack Davis
Sent: 15 November, 2017 7:48 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESOx2: Egyptian Goose
Looks sharp enough to me, Alan.
Seems somewhat
Frankly its obvious that new development is only going to be on CC
from this point forward. Lightroom 6 was constantly behind the CC
version too, so that should say a lot about how much they care about
it. Adobe wanted to pull this move to subscription all along. It makes
sense if you regularly
Didn't mean to quote John there btw either. Just a general reply. :)
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
> CC has come quite a ways since version 5. Just being able to do
> panoramas and hdr in lightroom alone is pretty huge. For $10 a month
> with photoshop
CC has come quite a ways since version 5. Just being able to do
panoramas and hdr in lightroom alone is pretty huge. For $10 a month
with photoshop its really not a bad deal at all considering what you
get. Photoshop CC is pretty nice too. The new CC Classic has a lot of
performance improvements
I've had the CC version since it was launched, and have had absolutely no
issues with it. I moved
up to it from PS Elements, and before then had CS3, so there was a significant
improvement in
functionality. The advantage of having new features and improvements available
immediately at no
I use PS CC (now 2018).
It works OK, and especially after I got the K-1 and the kamera and lens
profiles were updated pretty fast. Too often a camera upgrade earlier meant an
updated PS too, so if you change cameras (too) often the price of the CC is not
that much.
On the other hand I´m not
My friend Candice ccmo...@pacbell.net asked me about photoshop cc, and when I
asked why she said:
I'm looking for reviews from people I know, because Brett wants to upgrade and
just about everyone I know is still using CS5/CS6 and have pretty much refused
to upgrade to Creative Cloud
Would
> On Nov 15, 2017, at 6:16 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Thank you, Jack and Larry.
>
> Yes, I realize the DoF is shallow. It was worse on most of the other
> shots.The light was not great, and the damn little guy was squirming
> around a bit, so even on a tripod,
Looks sharp enough to me, Alan.
Seems somewhat contrasty.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 15, 2017, at 9:21 AM, Alan C wrote:
>
> I was reluctant to post these after seeing those fine shots of Herons &
> Shovellers, so what's the verdict? Scroll R for the other. Range about
I was reluctant to post these after seeing those fine shots of Herons &
Shovellers, so what's the verdict? Scroll R for the other. Range about 30m &
cropped. I tried some noise reduction but lost too much detail.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/wisselstroom/38384040176/
K5 with the HD 55-300
Not that surprised, Dan. I couldn't
open it on my phone, but could on
the desk top.
I'd guess there are those who often
don't often go beyond their phone.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 15, 2017, at 6:36 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> I did see it yesterday.
>
>
> Dan
I did see it yesterday.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
> Attempted to post this yesterday, but fumbled the URL.
> Posted a shot of one of these sometime ago, but like this
> scene and
Introduction:
My Metz 58AF-1 got defective zooming mechanism than I bought a Metz
58AF-2 after 3 years the flash tube blew into peaces, I opened it to try
to replace the tube and found out that the tube is too small and can be
overloaded too easy. I reworked the head to fit a bigger tube, but
Thank you, Jack and Larry.
Yes, I realize the DoF is shallow. It was worse on most of the other
shots.The light was not great, and the damn little guy was squirming
around a bit, so even on a tripod, I was afraid to slow the shutter speed
down too much.
Dan
Dan Matyola
Attempted to post this yesterday, but fumbled the URL.
Posted a shot of one of these sometime ago, but like this
scene and the red eye.
C?
Thanks,
J
https://www.photo.net/photo/18436241
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 3:22 PM, mike wilson wrote:
>> On 14 November 2017 at 20:00 Bob W-PDML wrote:
>>
>>
>> Congratulations!
>>
>> Mary McIntyre ( the Mark Roberts of Stouffville)
>>
>> That's gotta be better than being the Mark Roberts of
22 matches
Mail list logo