Thanks Jack.
-- Original message --
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Certainly well balanced lighting. Nice scene, Paul.
Jack
--- On Sat, 5/31/08, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO:
Thanks Stan. I agree. That's why I posted a second shot:-)
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like this one much better! The total combination of pose,
expression, clothing...
stan
On May 30, 2008, at 3:39 PM, Paul Stenquist
Thanks Walter. Sounds like garage sale time!
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Very nice indeed.
I was musing over my lack of a studio the other day and missing my
studio lights.
I still have the building but it is filled with
Thanks Jack. Yes, I'll brighten her face. I'm also going to soften her facial
muscles and dimples. She's a very fit young lady and will benefit from a bit of
softening.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of the two, I prefer this one,
Thanks Bruce. Yeah, this one probably won't make the cut. She like it, but I'm
falling out of love:-).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technically good - lighting, focus and such. The overall pose
doesn't really grab me -
Yes, Kim and I will have to arrive at a level of softening we both like. She's
extremely lean and muscular and works as both a fitness model and a general
purpose photo model. Her aggressive, muscular look is her calling card, so we
don't want to cancel it. But at the same time, I think I can
Nice shot. A classic image.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for your comments, Stan.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Stan Halpin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice one Dan. I walked by there 15-20 times and for some
Thanks Bruce. Lot of work left to do on this set. I shot 400 frames and have
only looked at about fifty. I'll narrow it down to 30 or so and then start
finessing them. Lots of fun. Expecially when it's a lady:-).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bruce Dayton
Thanks Christian.
-- Original message --
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Paul MIles is a perennial winner of Detroit Music Awards. He performs
at numerous venues and plays on the street in downtown Birmingham,
Michigan. Shot him
Has Nikon released a direct successor to the D80? If not, that would explain
the difference. For Pentax the K20 was hot on the heels of the K10, and it was
obviously a replacement, not just an additional product for the market. Thus,
it became important for Pentax to clear out the K10s.
Paul
Thanks Fernando.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Fernando [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Love this one. Dynamic, beautiful image.
Cheers.
On 5/24/08, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul MIles is a perennial winner of Detroit Music Awards. He performs
at
Image Quality
-- Original message --
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I keep reading about camera and lenses having an IQ.
What the hell are they talking about?
thanks
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Good one. Interesting texture and light. And the water box adds a focal point
of
interest.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A textural study ...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/84-water.jpg
Water - Sunnyvale 2008
From what I understand the hot pixel problem has to do with the amount of time
the sensor is energized. It's a firmware programming mistake that causes it to
build heat to rapidly.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original
I agree. I go to dpreview myself from time to time. I realize it has some
value. But so many things get blown out of proportion that the annoyance factor
is huge.
The initial posts about the hot pixel/mirror lockup link seem to suggest that
the hot pixel/mirror lockup problem only happens when
Much better. I like it.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks to all for your comments. Based on the universal feeling, I
have worked the image over a bit. Hopefully, this works better:
I'm happy with my K20D, but that's because it meets my needs for the kind of
photography I do. It hasn't failed me yet. Like you, I'm interested in the
technical discussions, and I do stop in at dpreview from time to time to see
what's up. But the discussions usually aren't very intelligent or
I like this one a lot. I might have preferred it a bit more to the right as
Brian says, but Im not sure. In any case, the green fields and dramatic sky are
great. No split ND filter, I assume. You obviously achieved an exposure that
allowed you to balance the elements correctly. Excellent.
Paul
Build quality and viewfinder.
That's a lot.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, well perhaps we could talk about technical things for a minute...
I'm interested in your statement cheap ones aren't as bad in
comparison as
I agree in regard to the K200D, but I wouldn't call the K10D a mistake. It
represented great value for the money, and that helped put Pentax on the
consideration list for many buyers.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The utterly
I think that's the industry standard for end of life. the Nikon D200 dropped a
level at the end of its tenure as well.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That it did, but I can't help but think Pentax would have done better
with it if
-- Original message --
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I remember those days.
Pentax is in deep doo doo now.
There's no real evidence to support that. Time will tell, but it's certainly
not a given now. They're in better shape than they were in the
Very nice. Good packing job. Have fun.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A beautiful bike, nicely packed. Bon voyage!
stan
On May 27, 2008, at 7:18 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/roadtrip.jpg
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this is it, though I hope I'm wrong. Small group this year.
Mark Roberts
Me
Cory
List guy
Patti (One of
I forgot to put a card in the camera the other day, but like you I keep a 2 gig
card in the grip. I also have a second card on my key-chain in one of those
sandisk card holders. So I always have an extra 4 gig of cards.
-- Original message --
From: Y. Rowe
It's dpreview. It has to e taken with a grain of salt.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Follow-up: You are not the only one experiencing floating softness. See
the post here:
Sounds like you did your homework. Return the lens to the seller. I had a
centering proble on my first DA* 16-50, and BH replaced it without question.
If it's too late for that, get on Pentax. Show them your test results.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Mark
Yes. Flash filters are extinct.
-- Original message --
From: Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So. I've heard some talk about using filters on the flash to ballanse
the colour temp better
Couldn't you achieve the same effect in post processing if you shoot RAW?
A nice gallery. My favorite is the grey wall and open door. It's evocative and
unique.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a few little compositions and details that caught my eye as I pottered
about the 'hood today.
You can induce purple fringing with any lens on a digital sensor. Just shoot
dark branches against a white sky. It never fails. It's unavoidable, and it's
no reason to dismiss this lens. I expect the FA 200 would fringe even more. In
fact, based on experience with other earlier lenses, I'm sure
True. And it's a remarkably good image at 1600. But it would be a wee bit
better at 800:-). Great shot in any case.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Paul.
Perhaps you could get down to ISO 800 with some flash fill.
That's a suprise to me. Didn't see a bit of vertical banding at the size this
image was presented.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for looking commenting Dave.
Vertical banding ??
Kenneth Waller
It means I like almost all of them. Well done.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Some excellent work, Boris. The Jaguar shot is a nice composition. So
too, the X factor. But the majority are quite good.
I usually don't look at cat pics.
-- Original message --
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Stenquist wrote:
And a nice cat shot it is. You should feel honored, I'm normally pass
on the pussies.
Paul
.
um what?
ann
On May 15, 2008, at
Do you have a card reader? You don't really need (or want) to use the camera to
download. I've never done that in five years of shooting digital.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Steve Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, seems like the camera shorted or something,
Thanks Dave.
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finally got photo dot net to load up.
GREAT shot. Good pose and she has such a mature expression.
Dave
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Jack. Nope, no backfocus. The focus point is her right eye or eyelash.
At 100% it's tack sharp. Of course, as you probably know, the autofocus area
of a camera is larger than that red dot. What line or edge it will lock on is
partly a matter of chance. This was a grab shot, so I took
If it's an *ist DS2 you should go for it.
-- Original message --
From: Steve Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
maybe, but it was a model with more features
Maybe now you know why the one you bought was a hundred dollars less
William Robb
--
PDML
Good to know. i have a dream cruise book ready. Thought I had a publisher, but
with the economy going south, they bailed. I may try to publish it myself.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TN.??
Dave
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at
Thanks Dave and Frank.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good comp and colour
Dave
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7234010size=lg
--
Thanks Dave. Photo.net has been upgrading servers, so they've been off and on.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finally able to access photo dot net, must have been down for a while.
This one is great Paul. The expressions are
Happy birthday. What the heck is halloumi? Hope it's good:-).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just had my birthday dinner: Halloumi with asparagus and brown rice.
ever since my birthday party with Cotty 2 years ago it's become a
Nice esposure and rendering. Good shot. But I have to agree with Ken. I think
we're fortunate to still count you among the walking and talking:-). You are a
brave man.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And here I thought Lucky was a
Certainly among the best of your recent posts. Well done.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At the theatre for the Bette Davis Film Festival ...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/80-lonely_life.jpg
The Lonely Life -
Yum.
Good one. I'll take a lobster roll and an order of clam strips.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A shot from inside a local, (relatively at least), seafood shack.
Chick's has a great location, right across the road from the
Hot pixels, cold pixels, I dunno. My K20 takes great pictures, and I'm too busy
shooting to test.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I ran the Starzen test on my K20.
I used 1/4 second so as to not invoke the you can't turn it off
Nice composition on an obvciously dreary day. A portly misnomer? :-)
Paul
-- Original message --
From: John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just trying out the newly acquired DA 18-55 MkII, seems better at the edges
at 18mm than my previous MkI version, not as
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ken Waller wrote:
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob W wrote:
On May 9, 2008, at 1:59 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
So to clarify -- you didn't get screwed?
No Ann, it
-- Original message --
From: John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Paul
Funny you should say that, I live in a place called Rainhill would that be
the antithesis?
Only if the sun is shining on Rainhill:-).
Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Nice. A fresh perspective.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/77-flower_fence.jpg
Flowers Fence - Sunnyvale 2008
©2008 by Godfrey DiGiorgi
Olympus E-1 + SMC Pentax-M 50mm f/1.4
ISO 100 @ f/1.4
Good stuff. I especially like those whose urls end in 62,29 and 54. Nice work.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Timber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi list!
This is a few image with the Pentax DA 12-24 f4:
2 HDRs:
http://www.pbase.com/timbercode/image/96784496
Thanks Rick.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another beautiful flower photo, Paul. The composition
and lighting are both great.
Rick
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a couple of assignments coming up where a second camera will be helpful,
so today I tested the K10D with the two DA* lenses. ARRRGGH!
It backfocuses severely. Now the lenses work fine on my K20D. Extremely fine,
in fact. (Although I did have to ask for a replacement for the 16-50/ And
No, you shouldn't care.
Given the darkroom technique you describe, you'll get much better results
shooting BW on a digital Pentax.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Michael S. Keller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been out of serious camera shopping for so long that only
-- Original message --
From: keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Stenquist wrote:
British English treats company names as plurals. American English
treats them as singular. The Brit system works better when it comes
to pronouns. It's hard to think of
HAR! Got me. Fingers on the wrong keys: But as a writer, I'd never construct
it like that. Unless, of course, I was looking to be fired. If I'm going to
be arrogant, I better proof read:-).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Steve,
Good to see you back on the list. I had two *istD cameras, and they were very
nice. Slow write speed but great images. I made many 13 x 19 prints and sold
quite a few in gallery shows. At ISO 400 or below, you can make beautiful large
prints. And if a bit of grainy noise is okay, ISO
Nice shot. I like your solution. Sounds like that would work for me as well.
Looks like some more seldom used equipment goes on the block.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Margus Männik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sometimes home and sick isn't that bad at all. At least I
I like it for the most part. The rendering is quite nice as is the tonality. I
do wish there was a little more breathing room above the flowers near the top
of frame. But overall, a nice photo.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Christine Aguila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I love it. Very nicely done.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I really enjoy the PESO/GESO postings here, and I thought others might
too. So I built a little mash-up that creates a Twitter feed. It's
at http://twitter.com/PDML which
The DA* 60-250 is coming. Should be a nice piece.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ralf R. Radermacher)
Hello all,
I'm looking for an AF version of my SMC-M 4.5/80-200 mm. Yes, I know
there's no direct AF equivalent of this lens. I'd want
Thanks Christine.Yeah, i was a bit annoyed that I missed a bit of the boot. But
I figured since the ehad was cropped it works more or less. If I was ambitious
and had extra time, I would create the rest of the boot. Maybe one of these
days.
Paul
-- Original message
Thanks Frank. Yes, what Grace says, goes. At least around here.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, that's what she said she was doing. Who am I to
Thanks Doug. You'll have to count that as another reason to be thankful you
have a boy child:-). But you really should add a girl when you're, uh,
ready:-)).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cute shot, but, um, are her pants on
I suspect all DA lenses will be useful on a FF camera, if and when it arrives.
It would almost certainly have a cropped frame mode to utilize the DA lenses.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I do still have the MZ-S . . .
Interesting and unique.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another insignificant shot from that new building in the harbour area:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=opera1
Comments welcome, obviously...
--
- Toralf
--
Thanks Dave.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Bob. I planted it fourteen years ago to commemorate a good
friend's leaving town. It was just a
Missed this one earlier. Busy day. But I like the subtle look. A fresh approach
here.
paul
-- Original message --
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I do, and I like how Brooks speaks. :)
Thanks!
Jack
--- On Sat, 4/26/08, David J Brooks [EMAIL
And BH is listing the DA* 300mm for only $1299. The Sigma is not a good deal.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oops! It is not an APO. Just DG EX
Walt
On 4/26/08, Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Christine. And thanks for commenting on my other recent pics.
Paul
(saving bandwidth:-)
-- Original message --
From: Christine Aguila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul: Great idea, excellent pose of Grace, a shot that delightfully evokes
youth dreams innocence
Thanks Christine. I appreciate the feedback (Saving bandwidth is off since
you're the only one who commented on this shot:-).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Christine Aguila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul: I like this very much. Great contrasting expressions on the
Missed this earlier. Very nice. We bought some California strawberries today,
but we've been buying Mexican berries for quire a few weeks.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Christine Aguila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Very nice Jack. Hope they tasted good. Cheers,
Very nice. Great balance of deep shadow and bright highlights. Good work.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 18/4/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Spent a bit of time experimenting with the Lightroom 2 Public Beta
It's not PC to like American Bud. But on a day when it's about 90 degrees F and
the Bud is about 35 degrees, it can be quite entertaining and rather
refreshing. It's very light yet quite alcoholic, so it's easy to consume a
quart of two in half an hour. Let the fun begin:-).
--
Thanks to all who commented on this pic.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good eye Paul.
Like the framing and depth to the shot.
Dave
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. A great shot. Congratulations.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 18/4/08, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
One is a shot of a cabin in the snow
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6924723
I absolutely love
Nice shots. Congrtulations on the magazine pub.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No big deal. A small cycling magazine from Vancouver, Momentum, will
be publishing a couple of my photos in their upcoming issue.
Excellent shot, Bob. I like Peter's as well. Daffodils are such a wonderful
sight at this time of year.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 16/4/08, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Must be something to do with the time of year, but
Gorgeous. A great scene. My only nit, and this may well be subjective, would be
the croppint of the tree. However, you could fix that by cloning in some sky
and trimming some branches on the left.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Congratulations to you and your lovely daughter. That's quite an achievment,
well documented here.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The dressage awards banquet and AGM was held last Sunday. Our team did
excellent in 2007.
Our
Beautiful. Love the chateau reflected in the River Cher and many of the others
as well.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Roberts wrote:
Inspired by Godfrey's excellent Isle of Man gallery I decided to finally
sort
What's more, the newest autofocus lenses offer excellent manual focus. The
focus ring on the DA* 16-45 is a delight in its smoothness and size. And its
throw is more than adequate, although not the equal of manual only lenses.
Paul
-- Original message --
From:
I agree wholeheartedly with what Godders said. I've printed on the R2400 with
several Epson papers -- ultra premium luster, premium semigloss, velvet fine
art, and enhanced matte (which has a new name) -- and have never seen a color
cast. The R2400 is a great BW printer. The key to success is
My second lens is excellent also. I'm loving it. But at least minimal testing
of new lenses is a good idea.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I bought mine very early, possibly one of the first to reach this
corner of the world.
After
Love the first one. Nice work.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here are two shots from the Alligator Farm in St.Augustine, Florida.
It's a local attraction and the birds are no fools, nesting above the
alligators.
In some cases,
Or at the Lamb Flag. Great article about Oxford pubs in today's New York
Times
travel section. Wish I had time for a visit. One of these days perhaps. (Be
afraid, Cotty. Be very afraid:-)
Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
I will do that Bob. I've been to England a few times but always for work and
never had time for the good stuff. I intend to make up for that some day.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Haven't been to the Lamb and Flag for years - let me
The *istD takes CF cars. I believe it will take an 8 gig with the latest
firmware.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And a 2nd question, will a *istD take an 8gig card?
Once upon a time, the *istDs only took 1gig sd cards...
Interesting is correct. It held my attention. Well seen.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Very interesting. The building in the background could pass as part of
a glass mosaic too. Must be a trick of the brick structure...
Jostein
What Frank said. I like the rich war light. Good shot.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:04 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last night I helped a friend celebrate leaving a job she hated after
I prefer the drama of the original. Everything doesn't have to come to an
equilibrium. Brutal shadows and highlights are a good thing.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I must say that Walter has done a good job of opening up the
That one whizzed right over my head.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: John Mustarde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Obviously, the point of the photo is
GREEK BOYS
COTTY ISLAND RESTAURANT
(waitress wanted)
and the guys on the left are encouraging Sinead on the
right to
Very interesting. But I don't think geek status is a prerequisite to enjoying
it. It's a great human interest story.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I found that interesting.
I guess that means I'm a geek (thanks for
It does look good, and I wouldn't have noticed the clone if you hadn't
mentioned it. The upper line of the truck grille seems to be isaligned, but tha
really doesn't matter here. Nice shot.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks
Broadway Photo and Abe's are two of the Brooklyn rip-off houses. I'd stick with
BH, Adorama or Amazon.com
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just saw this on dpreview:
http://www.shopcartusa.com/P_Pentax_K20D_(Body)_19381/#stores
I should add that the DA*16-50 is also much sharper at f4 than the 16-45. And
the continuous autofocus seems to be better. That being said, the DA 16-45 is a
great lens for te money. I thought long and hard about going to the 16-50. I'll
probably opt for the 60-250 as well.
Paul
Welcome to the list, Allison. Cute picture, perhaps a little dark in the
midrange. (Although I'm looking on a laptop, and it's tough to see accuraely.)
My daughter, Heidi Stenquist, is a graduate of the Art Institute of Pittsburgh.
About 2003, I believe. She's now an art director in Chicago.
The rendering looks quite good. But I'm on my daughter's POS laptop, so I can't
comment in detail. But really like the shot. I do wish his hand wasn't
tangential to the edge of the frame. But it's still an excellet pic.
Paul
-- Original message --
From:
What Ken said. Good to see you around here again.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Welcome back John, good to hear from you.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: John Mustarde [EMAIL
If I'm taking one lens, I definitely want the flexibility of a zoom with fairly
wide range. I would probably take a DA 16-45 or DA* 16-50.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bran Everseeking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:57:54 +1000
Peter McIntosh
601 - 700 of 4441 matches
Mail list logo