- Original Message -
From: Jim King
Subject: Re: A 400/2.8 and A70-210/4
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=22065098
Looks _great_! (pun intended)
It requires a serious tripod, like the original TiltAll..
It appears that this lens became #100 in your
Jim, Email me off list - I have something you may be interested in. Also
noted from the dpreview, that we live close to each other.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: A 400/2.8 and A70-210/4
- Original Message -
From: Jim
- Original Message -
From: Jim King
Subject: Re: A 400/2.8 and A70-210/4
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=22065098
Sweet.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Igor Roshchin wrote on Thu, 08 Feb 2007 19:15:20 -0800
Jim,
I am glad it was helpful to someone on this list.
I just hope it's a good one that you'll be happy with.
Good luck!
Igor
PS. If I ever meet you in person, I would be curious to try the feel
of this god-child. :-)
The lens
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Igor Roshchin wrote:
BTW, there was a recent eBay auction where you can see the trunk
it normally comes with:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=190071886400
It's impressive. :-)
Wow! Thanks Igor.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Heavy on the pocket and beyond:
Seemingly a rear lens: A 400/2.8
http://www.adorama.com/US%20%20%20%20248576.html
The price seems to be rather reasonable: $2.5K for this expensive lens.
(I cannot justify anything over $1000 for myself.)
Igor Roshchin wrote on Wed, 07 Feb 2007 12:32:52 -0800:
(snip)
Heavy on the pocket and beyond:
Seemingly a rear lens: A 400/2.8
http://www.adorama.com/US%20%20%20%20248576.html
The price seems to be rather reasonable: $2.5K for this expensive
lens.
(I cannot justify anything over $1000
Igor Roshchin wrote on Wed, 07 Feb 2007 12:32:52 -0800:
(snip)
Heavy on the pocket and beyond:
Seemingly a rear lens: A 400/2.8
http://www.adorama.com/US%20%20%20%20248576.html
The price seems to be rather reasonable: $2.5K for this expensive
lens.
(I cannot justify anything over $1000
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:22:23PM -0500, Jim King wrote:
Thanks (I think) for the post, Igor. I've been looking for a copy of
this monster in reasonably good condition and at a reasonable price
for my collection of A and A* primes. I pulled the trigger and
ordered it from Adorama
Thu Feb 8 04:35:24 EST 2007 Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Heavy on the pocket and beyond:
Seemingly a rear lens: A 400/2.8
http://www.adorama.com/US%20%20%20%20248576.html
The price seems to be rather reasonable: $2.5K for this expensive lens.
(I
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:24:40PM -0500, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Thu Feb 8 04:35:24 EST 2007 Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Heavy on the pocket and beyond:
Seemingly a rear lens: A 400/2.8
http://www.adorama.com/US%20%20%20%20248576.html
The
Jim,
I am glad it was helpful to someone on this list.
I just hope it's a good one that you'll be happy with.
Good luck!
Igor
PS. If I ever meet you in person, I would be curious to try the feel
of this god-child. :-)
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:22:23PM -0500, Jim King wrote:
Thanks (I
Hello everybody!
I remember somebody was looking for an A70-210 recently.
Adorama seems to have a moderately ($84) priced one:
http://www.adorama.com/US%20%20%20%20248565.html
and another one ($94):
http://www.adorama.com/US%20%20%20%20230458.html
Heavy on the pocket and beyond:
Seemingly a
Igor Roshchin wrote:
Hello everybody!
I remember somebody was looking for an A70-210 recently.
Adorama seems to have a moderately ($84) priced one:
http://www.adorama.com/US%20%20%20%20248565.html
and another one ($94):
http://www.adorama.com/US%20%20%20%20230458.html
Heavy on the pocket
14 matches
Mail list logo
