Thanks for sharing this.
There's some excellent photoshop work in those images - he must have a
really good computer.
Mark
On 4/5/2017 9:17 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
This was happening last year, but I didn't see it.
As far as I can tell, it was not discussed here. So, for those, who
like
ler
- Original Message - From: "Philip Northeast"
Subject: Re: Controversy around McCurry
Are McCurry's efforts as bad as this one?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/essays/vanRiper/030409.htm
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 6/4/17 1:26 pm, J
cer/director staging of scenes in
> war II movies shot at government request.
> As John states nothing new here.
>
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>
> - Original Message - From: "Philip Northeast"
>
> Subject: Re: Controver
ubject: Re: Controversy around McCurry
Are McCurry's efforts as bad as this one?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/essays/vanRiper/030409.htm
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 6/4/17 1:26 pm, John Sessoms wrote:
Doesn't seem to me any of the images he's acc
And that incident starts looking much more pale when outshadowed
by what the chief politicians shamelessly do these days with facts
on camera and in writing, and without any remorse when caught
with obvious contradictions.
That trend blurs the line of what's acceptable in the society in general
$1.99 good price!Burt I wouldnt part with mine even for $70...
On Amazon and on ebay for books or anything else there is always someone
who is asking rediculously high prices hoping some
sucker will search for a title or specific object and the high priced
item will come up first...
someo
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Bill wrote:
> On 4/6/2017 7:58 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:14 PM, William Robb
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> McCurry passes himself off as a photojournalist, Erwitt doesn't.
>>
>>
>> Erwitt did indeed "pass himself off" as a photojournalist, an
On 4/6/2017 7:58 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:14 PM, William Robb
wrote:
McCurry passes himself off as a photojournalist, Erwitt doesn't.
Erwitt did indeed "pass himself off" as a photojournalist, and still
does. That's according to Magnum Photos for who he was the presi
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:14 PM, William Robb
wrote:
>
> McCurry passes himself off as a photojournalist, Erwitt doesn't.
Erwitt did indeed "pass himself off" as a photojournalist, and still
does. That's according to Magnum Photos for who he was the president
for three years. "To this day he is
Philip Northeast wrote:
>Are McCurry's efforts as bad as this one?
>
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/essays/vanRiper/030409.htm
Some are worse, believe it or not.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
htt
That book is going for a range of prices from $1.99 to over 70 bucks
on Amazon. Majority in Good condition. Similar at Abe Books. How in
the world do they price these things?
I have another book from that same series and vintage, hardcover. Got
it for $8 from the US.
Good Erwitt info, Ann. Thanks
Are McCurry's efforts as bad as this one?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/essays/vanRiper/030409.htm
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 6/4/17 1:26 pm, John Sessoms wrote:
Doesn't seem to me any of the images he's accused of manipulating were
represented as "photojour
Doesn't seem to me any of the images he's accused of manipulating were
represented as "photojournalism". His photos that were represented as
"photojournalism" were not manipulated.
The Afghan girl's photo was not manipulated when originally published in
National Geographic. That he might want to
I have no problem with the staging and manipulation. If it makes for a better
photo, it's fine. But captions that suggest otherwise are a violation of
ethical standards. The picture is great. The writing is fraudulent.
Paul via phone
> On Apr 5, 2017, at 9:17 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
>
>
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 7:46 PM Bruce Walker wrote:
> Yeah, I followed this one and read that article last year. It's very
> interesting to me because a lot of folks do and have done what Steve
> did, with the main difference being that their work didn't end up in
> NatGeo -- a publication with so
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017, at 20:20, Subash Jeyan wrote:
> he is quite popular here and this controversy made mild headlines here
> in india at the time. fwiw, here is another perspective:
>
> https://thewire.in/36155/exposing-steve-mccurrys-photoshopped-world/
thank you for that, it's very valuabl
Bruce...
Yup, Erwitt set up the shot with the kid on the bicycle... (The original
is in color, by the way) _This was an advertising gig_
Never any claim made anywhere that it was candid...
He was hired by Doyle Dand Bernbach to shoot photos for the French
Tourist Office.
See page 60-61 ,
he is quite popular here and this controversy made mild headlines here
in india at the time. fwiw, here is another perspective:
https://thewire.in/36155/exposing-steve-mccurrys-photoshopped-world/
~subash
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 21:17:45 -0400 (EDT)
Igor PDML-StR wrote:
> This was happening last ye
Yeah, I followed this one and read that article last year. It's very
interesting to me because a lot of folks do and have done what Steve
did, with the main difference being that their work didn't end up in
NatGeo -- a publication with some very strong and specific guidelines
about what they will p
This was happening last year, but I didn't see it.
As far as I can tell, it was not discussed here. So, for those, who like
myself missed it completely.
Apparently, people discovered quite a few digital manipulations as well as
"staging" of the photos by Steve McCurry.
https://petapixel.com/2
20 matches
Mail list logo