Re: K10D - NO PowerZoom :(

2006-09-13 Thread Jostein Øksne
PZ isn't mentioned in the press release. Either it means that it is not implemented, or it means that they don't think it's a function worth mentioning. IMO, the latter is the case. :-) Jostein On 9/13/06, Margus Männik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am I really the only one who uses and loves this

Re: K10D - NO PowerZoom :(

2006-09-13 Thread mike wilson
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] PZ isn't mentioned in the press release. Either it means that it is not implemented, or it means that they don't think it's a function worth mentioning. IMO, the latter is the case. :-) I wonder if the ILM contacts are switched other than with the

Re: K10D - NO PowerZoom :(

2006-09-13 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
On 13.09.2006, at 00:51 , Margus Männik wrote: Am I really the only one who uses and loves this feature? Don't worry, powerzoom is available in K10D and mentioned in final press release (not the one that is floating around :-) Cheers, Sylwek -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: K10D - NO PowerZoom :(

2006-09-13 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
On 13.09.2006, at 09:09 , Jostein Øksne wrote: PZ isn't mentioned in the press release. It is mentioned, but in the final press release, we have to wait till tomorrow :-) Cheers, Sylwek -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: K10D - NO PowerZoom :(

2006-09-13 Thread Kostas Kavoussanakis
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, K.Takeshita wrote: I have all PZ lenses including 28-120 28-what? Kostas -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: K10D - NO PowerZoom :(

2006-09-13 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
On 13.09.2006, at 12:14 , Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote: I have all PZ lenses including 28-120 28-what? Oh Costas, that's just another rumour about new powerzoom lens :-) Cheers, Sylwek -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: K10D - NO PowerZoom :(

2006-09-13 Thread K.Takeshita
On 9/13/06 6:14 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have all PZ lenses including 28-120 28-what? Did I say 28-120? :-). Obviously it had to be 105 on the long end. I parted it a year ago when I was selling my MZ-3 and the buyer wanted 28-105 to go with it. Now I miss it.

Re: K10D - NO PowerZoom :(

2006-09-13 Thread Lawrence Kwan
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote: Am I really the only one who uses and loves this feature? Don't worry, powerzoom is available in K10D and mentioned in final press release (not the one that is floating around :-) Hmm... I don't think so. In the specs, under Lens Mount: Power

K10D - NO PowerZoom :(

2006-09-12 Thread Margus Männik
Am I really the only one who uses and loves this feature? BR, Margus -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: K10D - NO PowerZoom :(

2006-09-12 Thread Pål Jensen
- Original Message - From: Margus Männik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Am I really the only one who uses and loves this feature? Probably -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: K10D - NO PowerZoom :(

2006-09-12 Thread Digital Image Studio
On 13/09/06, Margus Männik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am I really the only one who uses and loves this feature? The contacts are definitely there and most likely re-implemented to support the potential SSM lenses, but there are also some fairly strong rumours that the camera does support power

Re: K10D - NO PowerZoom :(

2006-09-12 Thread Rick Womer
I used it when I was using the 28-80/3.5-4.7 lens. When I got the 24-90, I stopped using it of course, and didn't miss it one bit. Rick --- Margus Männik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am I really the only one who uses and loves this feature? BR, Margus -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail

Re: K10D - NO PowerZoom :(

2006-09-12 Thread K.Takeshita
On 9/12/06 7:45 PM, Rick Womer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I used it when I was using the 28-80/3.5-4.7 lens. When I got the 24-90, I stopped using it of course, and didn't miss it one bit. I thought it was useful particularly for a longer and heavier lens such as 80-200/2.8. I had a