Re: Way OT: Lots of Nasty Spam (not all spam)

2003-09-23 Thread Peter Alling
The important thing is, did you have a good time. At 03:29 PM 9/21/03 +0100, you wrote: On 21/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: Last year I sent one Nigerian on a wild goose chase to an hotel by the airport to meet my 'uncle' who was visiting Lagos on business. The idiot went there and knocked

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-22 Thread graywolf
Newsgroups Steve Larson wrote: I don`t think I use usenet either. OK, what is usenet? Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California Paul Stenquist wrote: Good point. Stenquist is not a common name. Less than 50 in the US last time I checked. I do have my address on some websites, but I don't use

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-22 Thread graywolf
30,000 or so. Not all sites have all of them though. Usenet antidates the Internet by quite a few years. It pretty much started out with university servers and expanded to almost everywhere. They used UUCP (Unix to Unix Copy) to send the messages from server to server. Servers would

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread Kevin Waterson
This one time, at band camp, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: me too, hundreds of them with attachments to make things worse. I doubt that they are legit and didnt try running any of the fixes. JCO Has anyone else been inundated by e-mail purportedly from Microsoft? I have had 12

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread D. Glenn Arthur Jr.
Has anyone else been inundated by e-mail purportedly from Microsoft? It's not spam and it's not actually from Microsoft. It's the latest mail-worm that's going around. I think the various infected machines have been mailing each other counterclockwise around the net and that's the real

RE: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread J. C. O'Connell
-Original Message- From: Doug Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 1:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 01:30:58 -0400, graywolf

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread Eactivist
Has anyone else been inundated by e-mail purportedly from Microsoft? I have had 12 today, all different. Mozilla Thunderbird is doing a nice job of filtering them. I am liking this software better and better. -- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com Not sure about the Microsoft part, but for

RE: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread D. Glenn Arthur Jr.
JCO wrote: I think I coined a new computer phrase via a typo. when you get a virus email w/ attachment it's not an attachment, it's an attacKment... Into the quote-of-the-day file with you then. (Posted daily around 5:25 AM to http://www.livejournal.com/users/dglenn)

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread graywolf
21, 2003 1:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 01:30:58 -0400, graywolf wrote: Has anyone else been inundated by e-mail purportedly from Microsoft? I have had 12 today, all different. Mozilla Thunderbird is doing a nice job of filtering them. I am

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread Dag T
På søndag, 21. september 2003, kl. 08:12, skrev D. Glenn Arthur Jr.: Has anyone else been inundated by e-mail purportedly from Microsoft? It's not spam and it's not actually from Microsoft. It's the latest mail-worm that's going around. I think the various infected machines have been mailing

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread Keith Whaley
I usually get over 300/day! Having a Mac, I don't worry about being infected, but the volume of email is almost overwhelming. I use Netscape Communicator 4.79, and while the filters are okay, not all of them end up in the trash folder, but in my inbox. I know Mozilla is taking over from the

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread graywolf
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/thunderbird/release-notes.html Keith Whaley wrote: I usually get over 300/day! Having a Mac, I don't worry about being infected, but the volume of email is almost overwhelming. I use Netscape Communicator 4.79, and while the filters are okay, not all of them end

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread Paul Stenquist
I don't get any spam on my home computer. Zip, zero, none. I'm on a compuserve.net cable modem with no other ISP. Perhaps Compuserve filters well. At work I get a few spams for prescription medications but that's about it. Since both of my systmes are Macs it isn't real important, but I'm pleased

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread graywolf
You also probably don't do usenet. Seems that is where most of the spammers get their addresses from. Paul Stenquist wrote: I don't get any spam on my home computer. Zip, zero, none. I'm on a compuserve.net cable modem with no other ISP. Perhaps Compuserve filters well. At work I get a few spams

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread Paul Stenquist
Good point. Stenquist is not a common name. Less than 50 in the US last time I checked. I do have my address on some websites, but I don't use usenet. In fact, I don't even know what usenet might be :-). Mark Roberts wrote: . Some spam comes from dictionary attacks: The spammer uses software

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread Keith Whaley
Paul Stenquist wrote: Good point. Stenquist is not a common name. Less than 50 in the US last time I checked. I do have my address on some websites, but I don't use usenet. In fact, I don't even know what usenet might be :-). Heck, I don't, either! But, I'm pretty sure SOME of the

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread Steve Larson
I don`t think I use usenet either. OK, what is usenet? Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California Paul Stenquist wrote: Good point. Stenquist is not a common name. Less than 50 in the US last time I checked. I do have my address on some websites, but I don't use usenet. In fact, I don't even

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread Steve Larson
Lots of Nasty Spam Good point. Stenquist is not a common name. Less than 50 in the US last time I checked. I do have my address on some websites, but I don't use usenet. In fact, I don't even know what usenet might be :-). Mark Roberts wrote: . Some spam comes from dictionary attacks

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread Eactivist
I don`t think I use usenet either. OK, what is usenet? Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California One can put spam blockers in one email address when using usenet. There are way to avoid spam when using usenet. Most of the spam I get on AOL is just directed to AOL members. People new to the Net

RE: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread J. C. O'Connell
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 9:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam I don`t think I use usenet either. OK, what is usenet? Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California Paul Stenquist wrote: Good point. Stenquist is not a common name. Less than 50

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread Steve Larson
, 2003 6:49 PM Subject: Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam I don`t think I use usenet either. OK, what is usenet? Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California One can put spam blockers in one email address when using usenet. There are way to avoid spam when using usenet. Most of the spam I get on AOL

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread Herb Chong
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 9:49 PM Subject: Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam People new to the Net just know pretty much about webpages, someone can fill you in on usenet better than I regarding how long it's been

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread Cameron Hood
Yes, I think the attachments are viruses or something, at least I hope so; I've been saving them for my collection. Another joy of Macs: virus collections! C On Saturday, September 20, 2003, at 11:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone else been inundated by e-mail purportedly from

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread Cameron Hood
On Saturday, September 20, 2003, at 11:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another triumph for MS software http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/32925.html Oh, goody! A worm collection! C

Re: Way OT: Lots of Nasty Spam (not all spam)

2003-09-21 Thread Cameron Hood
I usually tell them I'm sending them a cheque for $80,000,000.00, and include a smattering of viruses disguised as pictures of my vacation. C. On Sunday, September 21, 2003, at 05:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am happy to report that after getting a few about a month ago I haven't had

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread Eactivist
Thanks Doe. I have a recollection of it now, my neighbor used them, and I think I had a program that did it. It`s kind of like a DOS prompt newsgroup, eh? Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California Sort of. All text, anyway. Most newsgroups don't allow attachments, a few do, but not many. But

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-21 Thread Anders Hultman
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Doe. I have a recollection of it now, my neighbor used them, and I think I had a program that did it. It`s kind of like a DOS prompt newsgroup, eh? Sort of. All text, anyway. Most newsgroups don't allow attachments, a few do, but not

OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-20 Thread graywolf
Has anyone else been inundated by e-mail purportedly from Microsoft? I have had 12 today, all different. Mozilla Thunderbird is doing a nice job of filtering them. I am liking this software better and better. -- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-20 Thread Doug Franklin
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 01:30:58 -0400, graywolf wrote: Has anyone else been inundated by e-mail purportedly from Microsoft? I have had 12 today, all different. Mozilla Thunderbird is doing a nice job of filtering them. I am liking this software better and better. There's a new worm running

RE: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-20 Thread J. C. O'Connell
-Original Message- From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 1:31 AM To: Pentax Discussion Malling List Subject: OT Lots of Nasty Spam Has anyone else been inundated by e-mail

Re: OT Lots of Nasty Spam

2003-09-20 Thread Otis C. Wright, Jr.
Yes, very high rate for two days now. Lots of virus activity early today. Both seem to have subsided for now. Otis graywolf wrote: Has anyone else been inundated by e-mail purportedly from Microsoft? I have had 12 today, all different. Mozilla Thunderbird is doing a nice job of