Boris Liberman wrote:
> http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16107&full=1
>
Well seen, Boris. The natural shapes of the palms provides for a nice
counterpoint to the regularity and repetition of the sailboat masts.
Gorgeous light on the water too.
My only quibble would be what appears to be t
>
> I do believe, in anticipation of the Ulaan Bator camera show,
> that February is "talk like a mongol horde".
>
>
Indeed.
For the avoidance of doubt, they go "Har!" a lot.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 8/1/07, SJ, discombobulated, unleashed:
>and, do sharks prepare menus?
I saw some sharks prepare once.
It was Hamlet I think.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discu
On 7/1/07, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Now tie me a sheepshank, squirt!
Works better on the legs :-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
On Jan 8, 2007, at 5:16 AM, mike wilson wrote:
>
>>
>> From: SJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: 2007/01/08 Mon AM 09:44:49 GMT
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Subject: Re: PESO - Two palm trees
>>
>> On 1/8/07, mike wilson &
On 1/8/07, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: SJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On 1/8/07, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > From: Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > > I thought "Talk Like a Pirate Day" was in September.
> >
> > > Bob was doing "talk like a s
>
> From: SJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/01/08 Mon AM 09:44:49 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: PESO - Two palm trees
>
> On 1/8/07, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > From: Brian Walters <[EMAIL PR
On 1/8/07, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I thought "Talk Like a Pirate Day" was in September.
> Bob was doing "talk like a shark hunter who is about to be chomped". That's
> a January date.
what's the menu for february? or, if that
>
> From: Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/01/08 Mon AM 01:54:50 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: PESO - Two palm trees
>
>
> I thought "Talk Like a Pirate Day" was in September.
>
>
Bob was doing "
Bobby 'Bones, ;-)
> Aar! Them makes thur own followin' wind, them garlic-noshin'
> forinners.
I sure like the garlic-noshin' part ;-).
LOL.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I thought "Talk Like a Pirate Day" was in September.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Perhaps you should've dropped him a line.
>
>
> Ar. He can't stay down with three b
Bob W wrote:
>>>
>>>Well, sploice moy mainbrace if that don't sound loik an insult and
>>>foightin' tark fromm 'ee, Tug Wilson thou soak of a noin-tailed
>>>bilgerat what stinks loik a bucket o' canker-blossomed chum. I'll
>>>keel'aul thy foul leprous gunwhales sooner 'an spit on a dead
>
> man's
On Jan 7, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
>> From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> On 6/1/07, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>
>>> Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship, so I can tie
>>> her up to the dock.
>>>
>>> Cap'n Bob
>>
>> Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
>>
>> I
> >
> >
> > Well, sploice moy mainbrace if that don't sound loik an insult and
> > foightin' tark fromm 'ee, Tug Wilson thou soak of a noin-tailed
> > bilgerat what stinks loik a bucket o' canker-blossomed chum. I'll
> > keel'aul thy foul leprous gunwhales sooner 'an spit on a dead
man's
> > shan
Kenneth Waller
>From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 6/1/07, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship, so I can tie
>>her up to the dock.
>>
>>Cap'n Bob
>
> Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
>
> I didn't think you'd have a clew.
Why knot?
Wow, you must be an inexpensive date, as you are obviously easily
entertained...
Boris Liberman wrote:
> Hello there.
>
> mike wilson wrote:
>
>> Bob W wrote:
>>
>> Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship,
>>
>> so I can tie
>>
>
Hello there.
mike wilson wrote:
> Bob W wrote:
> Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship,
> so I can tie
>
>
> her up to the dock.
>
> Cap'n Bob
Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
I didn't think you'd have a clew.
>>
Bob W wrote:
Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship,
so I can tie
her up to the dock.
Cap'n Bob
>>>
>>>Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
>>>
>>>I didn't think you'd have a clew.
>>
>>Perhaps he should take a bow?
>
> >>
> >>Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship,
> >>
> >>so I can tie
> >>
> >>her up to the dock.
> >>
> >>Cap'n Bob
> >
> >Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
> >
> >I didn't think you'd have a clew.
>
> Perhaps he should take a bow?
> >>>
> >>>...
Hawse's for course's.
Dave
On 1/8/07, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Buoy this line is going adrift. Think I'll go mix something on the
> rocks.
>
> Jack
>
>
> --- Paul Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Time for this thread to take another tack...
> >
> > -P
> >
> > Jack Davis wr
Buoy this line is going adrift. Think I'll go mix something on the
rocks.
Jack
--- Paul Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Time for this thread to take another tack...
>
> -P
>
> Jack Davis wrote:
> > Now that's quite a reach.
> >
> > Jack
> > --- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
David Savage wrote:
> On 1/7/07, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Bob W wrote:
>>
Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship,
so I can tie
her up to the dock.
Cap'n Bob
>>>
>>>Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
>>>
>
Time for this thread to take another tack...
-P
Jack Davis wrote:
> Now that's quite a reach.
>
> Jack
> --- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship, so I can
>> tie
>> her up to the dock.
>>
>> Cap'n Bob
> Ahar Cap'n. W
On 1/7/07, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob W wrote:
> >>
> >>Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship,
> >>
> >>so I can tie
> >>
> >>her up to the dock.
> >>
> >>Cap'n Bob
> >
> >Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
> >
> >I didn't think you'd have a
>>>Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship,
>>>
>>>so I can tie
>>>
>>>her up to the dock.
>>>
>>>Cap'n Bob
>>
>>Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
>>
>>I didn't think you'd have a clew.
>
>Perhaps he should take a bow?
...or perhaps knot.
>
Now that's quite a reach.
Jack
--- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >> >>Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship, so I can
> tie
> >> >>her up to the dock.
> >> >>
> >> >>Cap'n Bob
> >> >
> >> >Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
> >> >
> >> >I didn't think you'd have a clew.
> >>
>
Bob W wrote:
>>
>>Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship,
>>
>>so I can tie
>>
>>her up to the dock.
>>
>>Cap'n Bob
>
>Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
>
>I didn't think you'd have a clew.
Perhaps he should take a bow?
>>>
>>>...or perhaps knot.
>>
On Jan 6, 2007, at 10:10 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Cotty wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/07, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>
>>> Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship, so I can tie
>>> her up to the dock.
>>>
>>> Cap'n Bob
>>
>> Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
>>
>> I didn't think you'd h
>
>
> >> >>Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship,
> so I can tie
> >> >>her up to the dock.
> >> >>
> >> >>Cap'n Bob
> >> >
> >> >Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
> >> >
> >> >I didn't think you'd have a clew.
> >>
> >> Perhaps he should take a bow?
> >
> >...or perhaps knot.
>
> Be s
>> >>Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship, so I can tie
>> >>her up to the dock.
>> >>
>> >>Cap'n Bob
>> >
>> >Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
>> >
>> >I didn't think you'd have a clew.
>>
>> Perhaps he should take a bow?
>
>...or perhaps knot.
Be stern with him.
--
Cheers,
You two are asking for a spanking...
Cotty wrote:
> On 6/1/07, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>> Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship, so I can tie
>> her up to the dock.
>>
>> Cap'n Bob
>>
>
> Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
>
> I didn't think you'd have a clew.
On 1/6/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cotty wrote:
>
> >On 6/1/07, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed:
> >
> >>Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship, so I can tie
> >>her up to the dock.
> >>
> >>Cap'n Bob
> >
> >Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
> >
> >I didn't think you
Cotty wrote:
>On 6/1/07, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship, so I can tie
>>her up to the dock.
>>
>>Cap'n Bob
>
>Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
>
>I didn't think you'd have a clew.
Perhaps he should take a bow?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Now, Boris seems to be missing. Ya better get ready to cover, Sweety.
Jack
--- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/1/07, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Thanks Cotty for being there for me.
>
> Well someone has to.
>
>
> Darling.
>
> --
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cotty
>
>
> ___
On 6/1/07, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship, so I can tie
>her up to the dock.
>
>Cap'n Bob
Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
I didn't think you'd have a clew.
--
Cheers,
Master Bates
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pas
On 6/1/07, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Thanks Cotty for being there for me.
Well someone has to.
Darling.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail L
Thanks Cotty for being there for me.
Jack
--- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/1/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Jack, what does it mean "transom"?
>
> Jack's not here, but a transom is the flat back end of a boat.
>
> A gold star to anyone who knows what a painter
Thanks Cotty for being there for me.
Jack
--- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/1/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Jack, what does it mean "transom"?
>
> Jack's not here, but a transom is the flat back end of a boat.
>
> A gold star to anyone who knows what a painter
On Jan 6, 2007, at 7:35 PM, Cotty wrote:
> Jack's not here, but a transom is the flat back end of a boat.
>
> A gold star to anyone who knows what a painter is (no cheating on
> Google!)
Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship, so I can tie
her up to the dock.
Cap'n Bob
On 6/1/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Jack, what does it mean "transom"?
Jack's not here, but a transom is the flat back end of a boat.
A gold star to anyone who knows what a painter is (no cheating on Google!)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, P
I like the concept. I'm not sure if the trees are strong enough to
command the attention as the subject. Especially as the leading lines
don't quite lead to them. If they were placed a little to the right
(you'd have to move - can't actually move the trees ) the
leading lines of boats would work
Boats or Doorways? (Just being a wise a**).
Boris Liberman wrote:
> Jack Davis wrote:
>
>> Lighting, especially with reflections, is very nice.
>> I'd have to crop out the lower right boat transom and suck up the
>> scene. Then moving slightly to the left and shooting back a little to
>> the r
l Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Boris Liberman
> Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 7:05 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: PESO - Two palm trees
>
>
> http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16107&full=1
>
>
Ya know, for many years I'd heard that word used in reference to the
motor mounting board or aft end of a boat. I just looked it up for the
first time and it may derive from one definition of, "a horizontal
cross piece".(?)
Jack
IOW, the "aft" or back end of the boats.
--- Boris Liberman <[EMAIL
Boris, nice mood shot. I like this one better than the flamingos (if
that means anything to you). I like you mentioned, did not notice the
an until others mentioned him, and I agree with Bob that you did a
good job on the exposure, I know that if I were there I would have
underexposed, and then I
ons, no answers)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Stenquist
Sent: 6. januar 2007 20:44
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO - Two palm trees
On Jan 6, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Boris
full advantage of the light to produce a
good photo.
--
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Kenneth Waller
> Sent: 06 January 2007 18:41
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: PESO - Two palm trees
>
egian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: 6. januar 2007 20:23
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO - Two palm trees
Hi!
Tim Øsleby wrote:
> For me, the two palms are misplaced in the composition. If they whe
On Jan 6, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> I
> think that on wider FLs the SR can indeed add some blurring instead of
> actually making it sharper.
>
>
I have found exactly the opposite to be the case. SR improves
sharpness for any handheld shot of moderate shutter speed. (less than
Kenneth Waller wrote:
> Since you've titled this "Two Palm trees", I'd have to say that the lines of
> boats are a distraction.
> It would be a stronger image with less foreground & less showing of boats on
> the RH side.
> YMMV.
> Trying not to be brutal but honest.
Thanks! That's what I am alw
Jack Davis wrote:
> Lighting, especially with reflections, is very nice.
> I'd have to crop out the lower right boat transom and suck up the
> scene. Then moving slightly to the left and shooting back a little to
> the right to get more of a look at the transom line of the string of
> boats on the
Hi!
Tim Øsleby wrote:
> For me, the two palms are misplaced in the composition. If they where a bit
> more to the right, it would have worked a lot better.
> I like the light, and the lazy waves in lower right corner, adds some life
> to the scene.
Tim, I rather dislike it when composition is 10
Hi!
Markus Maurer wrote:
> I would like it more if the man on the right corner was cut away and again
> the photo looks a bit blurred to me.
> But the trees are nice indeed Boris :-)
> greetings
> Markus
Markus, I did not notice the man until I read your message ;-). As for
the blur, indeed, thi
sage -
From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - Two palm trees
> http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16107&full=1
>
> As usual brutal and honest comments are the best ;-).
>
> Boris
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDM
Nicely ironic title.
Boris Liberman wrote:
> http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16107&full=1
>
> As usual brutal and honest comments are the best ;-).
>
> Boris
>
>
--
--
The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
-- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
--
PDML
Lighting, especially with reflections, is very nice.
I'd have to crop out the lower right boat transom and suck up the
scene. Then moving slightly to the left and shooting back a little to
the right to get more of a look at the transom line of the string of
boats on the right. Maybe I'd hate the re
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: 6. januar 2007 07:05
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO - Two palm trees
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16107&full=1
As usual brutal and honest comments are the best ;-).
Boris
--
PDML Pe
I think it's a nice shot of a harbor at dawn, but the title threw me.
The palm trees seem incidental.
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007, at 1:05 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16107&full=1
>
> As usual brutal and honest comments are the best ;-).
>
> Boris
>
> --
> PDML Pen
Great moody composition and the two palm trees add a nice focal point. I agree
with Marcus that it would be better if cropped a bit on the right to remove the
'half man'.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting Boris Liberman <[EMAIL
06, 2007 7:05 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO - Two palm trees
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16107&full=1
As usual brutal and honest comments are the best ;-).
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16107&full=1
As usual brutal and honest comments are the best ;-).
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
61 matches
Mail list logo
