PUG picture limits

2006-01-30 Thread John Forbes
Here is a concrete proposal: The maximum dimensions for a PUG picture shall be 1024 pixels wide AND 768 pixels high. I would guess that a very large majority of screens nowadays can display 1024 x 768. John (expecting a deluge of posts from WAP phone users demanding 72 x 48) -- Using

RE: PUG picture limits

2006-01-30 Thread Shel Belinkoff
That doesn't work because it doesn't account for the screen real estate taken up by various browsers. Really, a maximum of about 800 pixels wide should be comfortable for just about everyone on the list. I know there are a few here using 17 monitors and lower resolutions than 1024x768. Shel

Re: PUG picture limits

2006-01-30 Thread John Forbes
Point taken. It's past my bed-time. And I have a 19 screen. Amended concrete proposal: The maximum width for a PUG picture shall be 800 pixels and the maximum height shall be 600 pixels. John On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:18:08 -, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That doesn't work

Re: PUG picture limits

2006-01-30 Thread Rob Studdert
On 30 Jan 2006 at 22:57, John Forbes wrote: Here is a concrete proposal: The maximum dimensions for a PUG picture shall be 1024 pixels wide AND 768 pixels high. I would guess that a very large majority of screens nowadays can display 1024 x 768. John (expecting a deluge of posts

Re: PUG picture limits

2006-01-30 Thread Norman Baugher
You guys are just a bunch of pessimists... Norm Rob Studdert wrote: We really should find out what our generous PUG hosts can tolerate WRT bandwidth increases before we start discussing arbitrary amendments to the current file constraints.

Re: PUG picture limits

2006-01-30 Thread Jan van Wijk
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:57:24 -, John Forbes wrote: Here is a concrete proposal: The maximum dimensions for a PUG picture shall be 1024 pixels wide AND 768 pixels high. I think that is stretching it a bit too much ... At those dimensions, the filesizes would about triple compared to