Here is a concrete proposal:
The maximum dimensions for a PUG picture shall be 1024 pixels wide AND
768 pixels high.
I would guess that a very large majority of screens nowadays can display
1024 x 768.
John (expecting a deluge of posts from WAP phone users demanding 72 x 48)
--
Using
That doesn't work because it doesn't account for the screen real estate
taken up by various browsers. Really, a maximum of about 800 pixels wide
should be comfortable for just about everyone on the list. I know there
are a few here using 17 monitors and lower resolutions than 1024x768.
Shel
Point taken. It's past my bed-time. And I have a 19 screen.
Amended concrete proposal:
The maximum width for a PUG picture shall be 800 pixels and
the maximum height shall be 600 pixels.
John
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:18:08 -, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That doesn't work
On 30 Jan 2006 at 22:57, John Forbes wrote:
Here is a concrete proposal:
The maximum dimensions for a PUG picture shall be 1024 pixels wide AND
768 pixels high.
I would guess that a very large majority of screens nowadays can display
1024 x 768.
John (expecting a deluge of posts
You guys are just a bunch of pessimists...
Norm
Rob Studdert wrote:
We really should find out what our generous PUG hosts can tolerate WRT
bandwidth increases before we start discussing arbitrary amendments to the
current file constraints.
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:57:24 -, John Forbes wrote:
Here is a concrete proposal:
The maximum dimensions for a PUG picture shall be 1024 pixels wide AND
768 pixels high.
I think that is stretching it a bit too much ...
At those dimensions, the filesizes would about triple compared to
6 matches
Mail list logo