This pretty much describes my own experience. One thing though is the
realization how much pure Pentax photos I have. For a while I used
a Tokina zoom as my walk around and some of my best shots were taken
with that lens. Recently I have been using a Sigma lens and those
cannot be submitted as
I pulled a few discs to upload that I then realized (in time) were
Mamiya med. format. Honor system..and all.
Jack
--- Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This pretty much describes my own experience. One thing though is
the
realization how much pure Pentax photos I have. For a while I
Hi Bruce,
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:03:34 -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote:
This may sound funny, but in some respects, it almost feels like there
is a ratio - at least when you have submitted a fair number. I'm
running about 50% right now and that seems to hold steady. I'm
wondering if those who have
Yes, they're hard to predict, but they're overall mix looks good. In
the hard to predict category, I submitted both of the trailer park
images I showed here a month or so ago. The one where the woman looks
somewhat posed in the lawn chair was accepted. That one was not well
liked here. The
I agree. Seems they go for the highly juiced. I've shamefully found
myself nudging the hue/saturation slider, ever so slightly, while
questioning my moral discipline. 8-/
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still can't quite decide when they are going to accept and reject.
Many
In a message dated 3/28/2007 6:13:09 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree. Seems they go for the highly juiced. I've shamefully found
myself nudging the hue/saturation slider, ever so slightly, while
questioning my moral discipline. 8-/
Jack
No
This may sound funny, but in some respects, it almost feels like there
is a ratio - at least when you have submitted a fair number. I'm
running about 50% right now and that seems to hold steady. I'm
wondering if those who have submitted more than 20 are seeing anything
like that.
--
Bruce
There may have been a reason, Marnie, but there was never an excuse for
it. 8~O
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/28/2007 6:13:09 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree. Seems they go for the highly juiced. I've shamefully found
myself nudging
I've stopped submitting anything for the time being.
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Strangeness
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 06:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
I agree. Seems
I'm 4 for 5
Dave
On 3/28/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may sound funny, but in some respects, it almost feels like there
is a ratio - at least when you have submitted a fair number. I'm
running about 50% right now and that seems to hold steady. I'm
wondering if those who
Yep, about 50%.
Tom C.
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Strangeness
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:03:34 -0700
This may sound funny, but in some respects, it almost feels
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Strangeness
This may sound funny, but in some respects, it almost feels like there
is a ratio - at least when you have submitted a fair number. I'm
running about 50% right now and that seems to hold steady
My early submissions were more like that, but as the number grew, they
have seemed to accept about half.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, March 28, 2007, 8:40:21 AM, you wrote:
DJB I'm 4 for 5
DJB Dave
DJB On 3/28/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may sound funny, but in some
Virtually 100% were accepted in the beginning, but the percentage has
reversed itself as I've dug back further into my 'weaker' inventory.
IOW, their assessment seems to track with mine.
Jack
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm 4 for 5
Dave
On 3/28/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL
I've pretty much stopped submitting, at least for the time being, but
my hit rate dropped as my count went up.
Paul
On Mar 28, 2007, at 1:32 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Virtually 100% were accepted in the beginning, but the percentage has
reversed itself as I've dug back further into my 'weaker'
I uploaded two more recent shots. The flower and the bee (Spring Bee) and
the couple in the Corvette. Someone suggested the Corvette in the Lifestyles
Gallery, which I did.
It was rejected, but the flower/bee was accepted. Go figure. They must have
a ton of flower/insect pics already!! :-)
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Walter Hamler
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 3:18 AM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Pentax Gallery Strangeness
I uploaded two more recent shots. The flower and the bee (Spring Bee) and
the couple in the Corvette. Someone suggested the Corvette in the Lifestyles
I still can't quite decide when they are going to accept and reject.
Many of mine that were well liked here were rejected and many that
were not as well thought of have been accepted.
What makes it really tricky is deciding what to submit - since you
can't accurately guess what will be accepted,
18 matches
Mail list logo
