Yea, he needs a camera with a "mans" negative...
Cotty wrote:
> On 12/11/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>> Um. Those are all 645 shots. Sorry.
>>
>
> Okay, sister Mark.
>
>
--
The difference between individual intelligence and group intelligence is the
difference
All are nice, but none jump out at me like the first 67 shot you
showed.
--
Bruce
Sunday, November 11, 2007, 2:35:44 PM, you wrote:
MR> Spent some time this afternoon scanning some medium format slides. For
MR> your perusal:
MR> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d704702.jpg
MR> http://www.rober
On 12/11/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Um. Those are all 645 shots. Sorry.
Okay, sister Mark.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@p
Very nice work, Mark. All 645, right?
The first two look great to me, the last three I like the
compositions but the color balance seems a little too blue-purple.
I really must take the 645 out for a walk one of these days...
Godfrey
On Nov 11, 2007 4:35 PM, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Derby Chang wrote:
>Mark Roberts wrote:
>> Spent some time this afternoon scanning some medium format slides. For
>> your perusal:
>> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d704702.jpg
>> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d704703.jpg
>> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d704704.jpg
>> http://www.robertst
Stan Halpin wrote:
>I like 704 and 710. The other three don't do anything for me. The
>first two are nice enough, they illustrate the color and detail you
>can get with a MF, but they just don't grab me. Maybe as part of a
>series. I initially liked the bridge shot but I once I disassociated
Mark Roberts wrote:
> Spent some time this afternoon scanning some medium format slides. For
> your perusal:
> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d704702.jpg
> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d704703.jpg
> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d704704.jpg
> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d704706.jpg
>
Stan Halpin wrote:
> I like 704 and 710. The other three don't do anything for me. The
> first two are nice enough, they illustrate the color and detail you
> can get with a MF, but they just don't grab me.
I think perhaps the one I like most is the bridge. Although from this
perspective it l
What Stan said, but I would add the bridge shot as an interesting
execution. And I haven't been there. Good stuff.
Paul
On Nov 11, 2007, at 11:44 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
> I like 704 and 710. The other three don't do anything for me. The
> first two are nice enough, they illustrate the color and
I like 704 and 710. The other three don't do anything for me. The
first two are nice enough, they illustrate the color and detail you
can get with a MF, but they just don't grab me. Maybe as part of a
series. I initially liked the bridge shot but I once I disassociated
myself from the famil
In a message dated 11/11/2007 2:40:30 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Spent some time this afternoon scanning some medium format slides. For
your perusal:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d704702.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d704703.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/
Nice images Mark. My favorite is 710.
Are you going to print any? How big?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Scanning MF today
> Spent some time this afternoon scanning some medium
Mark,
Those look rich. I bet they are even better on the light table.
I like the way they are simple, focused on a few things.
You have resisted the temptation to cram the big canvas with extra junk.
Regards, Bob S.
On Nov 11, 2007 4:35 PM, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Spent some ti
Spent some time this afternoon scanning some medium format slides. For
your perusal:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d704702.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d704703.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d704704.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d704706.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7
14 matches
Mail list logo
