[Original Message]
From: Albano Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 11/10/2005 8:24:21 AM
Subject: Re: Speed of memory cards...
ok, then again, very intersting talk, but my
question
remians:
it's important the speed of the card? extra fast
cards
Hi gang,
Just wanted to know, based in your experience, how
important is the speed of memory cards (SD) and how it
affects camera's performance.
Regards
Albano Garcia
Photography Graphic Design
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar
http://www.flaneur.com.ar
and would prefer to use RAW
-- but this would be quite impossible.
Don
Albano Garcia wrote:
Hi gang,
Just wanted to know, based in your experience, how
important is the speed of memory cards (SD) and how it
affects camera's performance.
Regards
Albano Garcia
Photography Graphic Design
http
wanted to know, based in your experience, how
important is the speed of memory cards (SD) and how it
affects camera's performance.
Regards
Albano Garcia
Photography Graphic Design
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar
http://www.flaneur.com.ar
-- but this would be quite
impossible.
Don
Albano Garcia wrote:
Hi gang,
Just wanted to know, based in your experience, how
important is the speed of memory cards (SD) and how it
affects camera's performance.
Regards
Albano Garcia
Photography Graphic Design
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar
http
- Original Message -
From: Don Williams
Subject: Re: Speed of memory cards...
For my work rather important. I've been taking series of pictures of
dynamic events and after about four pictures the camera needs to unload
the buffer into the card. This interrupts the record
- Original Message -
From: Don Williams
Subject: Re: Speed of memory cards...
I didn't know that -- what a chump! I should have checked. But I have one
further problem. The RAW files can be converted in Photoshop easily and
further processed -- but when I convert (to TIFF) and send
.
Don
Albano Garcia wrote:
Hi gang,
Just wanted to know, based in your experience, how
important is the speed of memory cards (SD) and how it
affects camera's performance.
Regards
Albano Garcia
Photography Graphic Design
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar
http://www.flaneur.com.ar
William Robb wrote:
If you check file sizes, I think you will find that TIFFs are larger
than RAW files.
If this is the case, then it would be faster to write RAW files to the
card.
My experience is with the istD, which definitely has smaller RAW files
than TIFFs.
William Robb
Has to be
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Speed of memory cards...
That's a PS issue, or more likely a PSP issue. My offhand guess is that
PSP is not honouring the embedded colour profile. Convert them to sRGB and
you should be good to go. Or send them as PSD's, which PSP
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Speed of memory cards...
Has to be the D anyways, the DS and co don't do TIFF.
I was just testing you.
William Robb
On 10 Nov 2005 at 9:30, William Robb wrote:
I just checked the Corel website regarding this. It looks like you need
version X to get 16 bit support, which is what the istD TIFFs need out of
the camera.
TIFF straight out of the *istD are 8 bit.
It's hard to say exactly what Don means by
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: Speed of memory cards...
On 10 Nov 2005 at 9:30, William Robb wrote:
I just checked the Corel website regarding this. It looks like you need
version X to get 16 bit support, which is what the istD TIFFs need out of
the camera
PEF doesn't have a colourspace per se. The convention holds from the
JPEG and TIFF's and also affects the embedded JPEG as well as the
default conversion settings, but as the PEF is raw sensor data it can't
have a colourspace.
I use ProPhotoRGB for my PEF conversion space just fine.
-Adam
ok, then again, very intersting talk, but my question
remians:
it's important the speed of the card? extra fast cards
are worth it?
Regards
Albano
--- Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10 Nov 2005 at 9:30, William Robb wrote:
I just checked the Corel website regarding this.
It
Moderately fast cards will be beneficial, although the camera will not
take full advantage of the fastest cards available. You will still see a
noticable boost in a card reader with the fastest cards, which aids in
getting images off the camera (use a card reader, the in-camera USB is
slow and
On Nov 10, 2005, at 7:30 AM, William Robb wrote:
I just checked the Corel website regarding this. It looks like you
need version X to get 16 bit support, which is what the istD TIFFs
need out of the camera.
The *ist D TIFFs are [EMAIL PROTECTED] First I'd ever heard that.
Godfrey
On Nov 10, 2005, at 5:37 AM, Albano Garcia wrote:
Just wanted to know, based in your experience, how
important is the speed of memory cards (SD) and how it
affects camera's performance.
Cards that are slower than the camera's IO capability will present
the limit to how fast a camera can
Thanks for the info!
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 10, 2005, at 5:37 AM, Albano Garcia wrote:
Just wanted to know, based in your experience, how
important is the speed of memory cards (SD) and
how it
affects camera's performance.
Cards that are slower than
- Original Message -
From: Albano Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: Speed of memory cards...
ok, then again, very intersting talk, but my question
remians:
it's important the speed of the card? extra fast cards
, based in your experience, how
important is the speed of memory cards (SD) and how it
affects camera's performance.
Regards
Albano Garcia
Photography Graphic Design
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar
http://www.flaneur.com.ar
__ Yahoo! Mail
@pdml.net
Date: 11/10/2005 8:24:21 AM
Subject: Re: Speed of memory cards...
ok, then again, very intersting talk, but my question
remians:
it's important the speed of the card? extra fast cards
are worth it?
On 10 Nov 2005 at 11:17, Adam Maas wrote:
PEF doesn't have a colourspace per se. The convention holds from the
JPEG and TIFF's and also affects the embedded JPEG as well as the
default conversion settings, but as the PEF is raw sensor data it can't
have a colourspace.
Of course but the
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 10 Nov 2005 at 11:17, Adam Maas wrote:
PEF doesn't have a colourspace per se. The convention holds from the
JPEG and TIFF's and also affects the embedded JPEG as well as the
default conversion settings, but as the PEF is raw sensor data it can't
have a colourspace.
On 10 Nov 2005 at 18:33, Adam Maas wrote:
Of course the issue there isn't Pentax's fault. The standard is broken
(Massively), and Pentax is just folowing the standard for it's naming
convention.
How so? EXIF 1.0 has the ability to contain a standard colorspace tag, isn't it
simply the case
of memory cards...
The problem is that colorspace in a PEF is denoted by file name
conventions not
embedded, so the recipient has to know that an underscore preceding the
name
indicated that the assumed colorspace is AdobeRGB and assign it manually,
a
crap system really.
On 10 Nov 2005 at 21:26, Herb Chong wrote:
my RAW files are not named any differently whether set to Adobe RGB or sRGB.
the
JPG and TIFF files are named differently.
Sorry yes you are correct, I intended the comment to refer to camera generated
TIFF and JPEG files as did the initial query.
On Nov 10, 2005, at 2:58 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Of course but the in-camera TIFF or JPEG files are processed to
conform with
either sRGB or AdobeRGB yet the colorspace information isn't
embedded. It's
assumed that the file will be opened and assigned the correct
colorspace
manually by
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 10 Nov 2005 at 18:33, Adam Maas wrote:
Of course the issue there isn't Pentax's fault. The standard is broken
(Massively), and Pentax is just folowing the standard for it's naming
convention.
How so? EXIF 1.0 has the ability to contain a standard colorspace
On 10 Nov 2005 at 20:05, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
When I open a JPEG file that has been made in-camera with Adobe RGB
colorspace, it puts the funny file name on it and Photoshop opens it
directly. If it had no colorspace profile or one that wasn't A-RGB,
it would ask me whether I wanted
On Nov 10, 2005, at 10:13 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 10 Nov 2005 at 20:05, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
When I open a JPEG file that has been made in-camera with Adobe RGB
colorspace, it puts the funny file name on it and Photoshop opens it
directly. If it had no colorspace profile or one that
31 matches
Mail list logo
