Re: Why is this 400mm going for so cheap?

2013-09-12 Thread Doug Franklin

On 2013-09-12 1:37, Zos Xavius wrote:

Oh, I was looking at pentaxforums prices and saw 1500. I swear
pentaxforums reviews manipulate prices. So you are saying that the 400
is worth less? Interesting. I'd actually love to pick up a 400 even if
it said sigma on it. Those lenses were supposedly very good and work
well with matching TCs.


I don't know about that specific lens, but I have a different year or 
model of the Sigma APO 400/5.6 Macro (mine looks different) and it's a 
good lens.  I've never bought a UG (ugly) rated item from Keh, but I've 
bought numerous BGN (bargain) rated items, and been pleasantly surprised 
each time by the condition.


--
Doug Lefty Franklin
NutDriver Racing
http://NutDriver.org
Facebook NutDriver Racing
Sponsored by Murphy


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why is this 400mm going for so cheap?

2013-09-12 Thread John

That's a horse of a different color. You really can't compare the asking
price of a Pentax Medium Format lens from a private seller with KEH's
price for a third party 35mm camera lens.


On 9/12/2013 11:49 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:

http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/photographic-equipment-sale/236840-sale-pentax-67-400mm-f4.html

Of courseno automation...larger...heavier...but faster at least. :)

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Doug Franklin do...@nutdriver.org wrote:

On 2013-09-12 1:37, Zos Xavius wrote:


Oh, I was looking at pentaxforums prices and saw 1500. I swear
pentaxforums reviews manipulate prices. So you are saying that the 400
is worth less? Interesting. I'd actually love to pick up a 400 even if
it said sigma on it. Those lenses were supposedly very good and work
well with matching TCs.



I don't know about that specific lens, but I have a different year or model
of the Sigma APO 400/5.6 Macro (mine looks different) and it's a good lens.
I've never bought a UG (ugly) rated item from Keh, but I've bought numerous
BGN (bargain) rated items, and been pleasantly surprised each time by the
condition.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why is this 400mm going for so cheap?

2013-09-12 Thread Zos Xavius
I can too! :P

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:44 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
 That's a horse of a different color. You really can't compare the asking
 price of a Pentax Medium Format lens from a private seller with KEH's
 price for a third party 35mm camera lens.



 On 9/12/2013 11:49 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:


 http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/photographic-equipment-sale/236840-sale-pentax-67-400mm-f4.html

 Of courseno automation...larger...heavier...but faster at least. :)

 On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Doug Franklin do...@nutdriver.org
 wrote:

 On 2013-09-12 1:37, Zos Xavius wrote:


 Oh, I was looking at pentaxforums prices and saw 1500. I swear
 pentaxforums reviews manipulate prices. So you are saying that the 400
 is worth less? Interesting. I'd actually love to pick up a 400 even if
 it said sigma on it. Those lenses were supposedly very good and work
 well with matching TCs.



 I don't know about that specific lens, but I have a different year or
 model
 of the Sigma APO 400/5.6 Macro (mine looks different) and it's a good
 lens.
 I've never bought a UG (ugly) rated item from Keh, but I've bought
 numerous
 BGN (bargain) rated items, and been pleasantly surprised each time by the
 condition.


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why is this 400mm going for so cheap?

2013-09-12 Thread Zos Xavius
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/photographic-equipment-sale/236840-sale-pentax-67-400mm-f4.html

Of courseno automation...larger...heavier...but faster at least. :)

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Doug Franklin do...@nutdriver.org wrote:
 On 2013-09-12 1:37, Zos Xavius wrote:

 Oh, I was looking at pentaxforums prices and saw 1500. I swear
 pentaxforums reviews manipulate prices. So you are saying that the 400
 is worth less? Interesting. I'd actually love to pick up a 400 even if
 it said sigma on it. Those lenses were supposedly very good and work
 well with matching TCs.


 I don't know about that specific lens, but I have a different year or model
 of the Sigma APO 400/5.6 Macro (mine looks different) and it's a good lens.
 I've never bought a UG (ugly) rated item from Keh, but I've bought numerous
 BGN (bargain) rated items, and been pleasantly surprised each time by the
 condition.

 --
 Doug Lefty Franklin
 NutDriver Racing
 http://NutDriver.org
 Facebook NutDriver Racing
 Sponsored by Murphy



 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why is this 400mm going for so cheap?

2013-09-12 Thread Mark C

On 9/12/2013 9:32 AM, Doug Franklin wrote:

On 2013-09-12 1:37, Zos Xavius wrote:

Oh, I was looking at pentaxforums prices and saw 1500. I swear
pentaxforums reviews manipulate prices. So you are saying that the 400
is worth less? Interesting. I'd actually love to pick up a 400 even if
it said sigma on it. Those lenses were supposedly very good and work
well with matching TCs.


I don't know about that specific lens, but I have a different year or 
model of the Sigma APO 400/5.6 Macro (mine looks different) and it's a 
good lens.  I've never bought a UG (ugly) rated item from Keh, but 
I've bought numerous BGN (bargain) rated items, and been pleasantly 
surprised each time by the condition.


I once owned a Sigma 400 f4.6 APO Macro. There were several other SIgma 
400mm lenses around before that one, but the APO Macro was highly 
regarded. The others were not held in such high esteem. Sigma used to 
have a very bad reputation for quality - back in the 90's - but IMO they 
really turned that around. That is one of the few lenses that I sold 
that I had wished I held onto.


I wound up with a Tokina ATX 400 f5.6 which was regarded as being 
comparable in quality to the Sigma. In my opinion it is very close in 
qualty - at f8 - but lags at f5.6. Again - there were other variants of 
the Tokina lens - the SD for instance - but the ATX was the latest and 
the most highly regarded. I bought a replacement Tokina for $425 a few 
years ago.


I tested both the Sigma and the Tokina with teleconverters and did not 
find the results to be satisfactory - they are already pretty slow at f5.6.


Mark

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Why is this 400mm going for so cheap?

2013-09-11 Thread Zos Xavius
They average $1500 used usually. $90 seems like quite the steal, ugly
condition or not.

http://www.keh.com/camera/Pentax-Manual-Focus-Non-Mfg-Fixed-Focal-Length-Lenses/1/sku-PK080090382060?r=FE

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why is this 400mm going for so cheap?

2013-09-11 Thread Larry Colen
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 03:37:57PM -0400, Zos Xavius wrote:
 They average $1500 used usually. $90 seems like quite the steal, ugly
 condition or not.
 
 http://www.keh.com/camera/Pentax-Manual-Focus-Non-Mfg-Fixed-Focal-Length-Lenses/1/sku-PK080090382060?r=FE

For about a C-note, it's probably worth getting it to find out.

 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
Larry Colen  l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why is this 400mm going for so cheap?

2013-09-11 Thread John
KEH UG - Ugly Very rough looking. Multiple impressions in metal, 
excessive finish loss and brassing. Glass will have marks, fungus and/or 
haze which will affect picture quality.*


which will affect picture quality says it all for me. It's not might 
affect picture quality, it's *WILL* affect picture quality.


If KEH says it's only worth $90, I'll take their word for it.

On 9/11/2013 3:37 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:

They average $1500 used usually. $90 seems like quite the steal, ugly
condition or not.

http://www.keh.com/camera/Pentax-Manual-Focus-Non-Mfg-Fixed-Focal-Length-Lenses/1/sku-PK080090382060?r=FE



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why is this 400mm going for so cheap?

2013-09-11 Thread Zos Xavius
OhI thought that ugly lenses were still ok optically. Yeah, you
are right it probably has fungus or something really awful.

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:19 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
 KEH UG - Ugly Very rough looking. Multiple impressions in metal,
 excessive finish loss and brassing. Glass will have marks, fungus and/or
 haze which will affect picture quality.*

 which will affect picture quality says it all for me. It's not might
 affect picture quality, it's *WILL* affect picture quality.

 If KEH says it's only worth $90, I'll take their word for it.


 On 9/11/2013 3:37 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:

 They average $1500 used usually. $90 seems like quite the steal, ugly
 condition or not.


 http://www.keh.com/camera/Pentax-Manual-Focus-Non-Mfg-Fixed-Focal-Length-Lenses/1/sku-PK080090382060?r=FE


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why is this 400mm going for so cheap?

2013-09-11 Thread Darren Addy
I'm with John on this one. Somebody ELSE can have THAT steal.

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:19 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
 KEH UG - Ugly Very rough looking. Multiple impressions in metal,
 excessive finish loss and brassing. Glass will have marks, fungus and/or
 haze which will affect picture quality.*

 which will affect picture quality says it all for me. It's not might
 affect picture quality, it's *WILL* affect picture quality.

 If KEH says it's only worth $90, I'll take their word for it.


 On 9/11/2013 3:37 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:

 They average $1500 used usually. $90 seems like quite the steal, ugly
 condition or not.


 http://www.keh.com/camera/Pentax-Manual-Focus-Non-Mfg-Fixed-Focal-Length-Lenses/1/sku-PK080090382060?r=FE


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.



-- 
Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why is this 400mm going for so cheap?

2013-09-11 Thread Stan Halpin
Thanks - I'll let you know how it checks it.

stan

On Sep 11, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Darren Addy wrote:

 I'm with John on this one. Somebody ELSE can have THAT steal.
 
 On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:19 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
 KEH UG - Ugly Very rough looking. Multiple impressions in metal,
 excessive finish loss and brassing. Glass will have marks, fungus and/or
 haze which will affect picture quality.*
 
 which will affect picture quality says it all for me. It's not might
 affect picture quality, it's *WILL* affect picture quality.
 
 If KEH says it's only worth $90, I'll take their word for it.
 
 
 On 9/11/2013 3:37 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
 
 They average $1500 used usually. $90 seems like quite the steal, ugly
 condition or not.
 
 
 http://www.keh.com/camera/Pentax-Manual-Focus-Non-Mfg-Fixed-Focal-Length-Lenses/1/sku-PK080090382060?r=FE
 
 
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.
 
 
 
 -- 
 Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes.
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why is this 400mm going for so cheap?

2013-09-11 Thread Paul Stenquist
Non manufacturer 400s average $1500? Not on this planet.

Paul via phone

On Sep 11, 2013, at 7:54 PM, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:

 Thanks - I'll let you know how it checks it.
 
 stan
 
 On Sep 11, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
 
 I'm with John on this one. Somebody ELSE can have THAT steal.
 
 On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:19 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
 KEH UG - Ugly Very rough looking. Multiple impressions in metal,
 excessive finish loss and brassing. Glass will have marks, fungus and/or
 haze which will affect picture quality.*
 
 which will affect picture quality says it all for me. It's not might
 affect picture quality, it's *WILL* affect picture quality.
 
 If KEH says it's only worth $90, I'll take their word for it.
 
 
 On 9/11/2013 3:37 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
 
 They average $1500 used usually. $90 seems like quite the steal, ugly
 condition or not.
 
 
 http://www.keh.com/camera/Pentax-Manual-Focus-Non-Mfg-Fixed-Focal-Length-Lenses/1/sku-PK080090382060?r=FE
 
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.
 
 
 
 -- 
 Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes.
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions.
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why is this 400mm going for so cheap?

2013-09-11 Thread Zos Xavius
Oh, I was looking at pentaxforums prices and saw 1500. I swear
pentaxforums reviews manipulate prices. So you are saying that the 400
is worth less? Interesting. I'd actually love to pick up a 400 even if
it said sigma on it. Those lenses were supposedly very good and work
well with matching TCs.

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
 Non manufacturer 400s average $1500? Not on this planet.

 Paul via phone

 On Sep 11, 2013, at 7:54 PM, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:

 Thanks - I'll let you know how it checks it.

 stan

 On Sep 11, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Darren Addy wrote:

 I'm with John on this one. Somebody ELSE can have THAT steal.

 On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:19 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
 KEH UG - Ugly Very rough looking. Multiple impressions in metal,
 excessive finish loss and brassing. Glass will have marks, fungus and/or
 haze which will affect picture quality.*

 which will affect picture quality says it all for me. It's not might
 affect picture quality, it's *WILL* affect picture quality.

 If KEH says it's only worth $90, I'll take their word for it.


 On 9/11/2013 3:37 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:

 They average $1500 used usually. $90 seems like quite the steal, ugly
 condition or not.


 http://www.keh.com/camera/Pentax-Manual-Focus-Non-Mfg-Fixed-Focal-Length-Lenses/1/sku-PK080090382060?r=FE

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.



 --
 Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes.

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions.


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions.

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.