Get the sigma. It's a better/faster lens. I said it.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 1:16 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Larry,
>
> Good friend of mine has Sigma lens in Canon mount. He's using it on 5dmk3.
> The results are excellent. Wide open center sharpness is really good. The
> rendering of this lens
Larry,
Good friend of mine has Sigma lens in Canon mount. He's using it on 5dmk3.
The results are excellent. Wide open center sharpness is really good. The
rendering of this lens is also very pleasing to his and actually to my eye
as well.
So if you really need 1.4 over 1.8, you cannot really go
Larry,
I perfectly understand your dilemma.
But...
Selling 31/1.8 to purchase Sigma 35/1.4 is like
selling your left kidney to finance the surgery on your right one.
IMHO, 31/1.8 is just too good of a lens to let it go.
It is almost as good as 77/1.8.
The rendering of both of these is so grea
I do a lot of my photography in really low light. The 2/3 stop between
f/1.8 and f/1.4 doesn't seem like much, but when you're talking the
difference between 1/13 and 1/20 Second, it can be a huge difference.
Similarly, doing night landscapes, the 2/3 stop can be a big deal with
star motion in
4 matches
Mail list logo