Re: smaller resolution vs native formats (Test Results)

Ja, you're right. I'll have to do it again. Alan C On 08-Jul-18 03:02 AM, Rick Womer wrote: Methinks that unless you compare RAW files, you’re not comparing sensors, only processing. Rick On Jul 6, 2018, at 4:13 AM, Alan C wrote: OK. Here they are:

Re: smaller resolution vs native formats (Test Results)

Methinks that unless you compare RAW files, you’re not comparing sensors, only processing. Rick > On Jul 6, 2018, at 4:13 AM, Alan C wrote: > > OK. Here they are: > > https://www.flickr.com/photos/wisselstroom/43181328112/ > > K5 shown - scroll for K110D Both 6Mp 3star JPEG's. > > Both

Re: smaller resolution vs native formats (Test Results)

OK. Here they are: https://www.flickr.com/photos/wisselstroom/43181328112/ K5 shown - scroll for K110D  Both 6Mp 3star JPEG's. Both taken with the HD 55 - 300mm @ 300mm   f8   AV  Range of subject about 40m. Mininimal post processing, images uncropped, not sharpened If you look at the EXIF