Ja, you're right. I'll have to do it again.
Alan C
On 08-Jul-18 03:02 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
Methinks that unless you compare RAW files, you’re not comparing sensors, only
processing.
Rick
On Jul 6, 2018, at 4:13 AM, Alan C <c...@lantic.net> wrote:
OK. Here they are:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/wisselstroom/43181328112/
K5 shown - scroll for K110D Both 6Mp 3star JPEG's.
Both taken with the HD 55 - 300mm @ 300mm f8 AV Range of subject about
40m. Mininimal post processing, images uncropped, not sharpened
If you look at the EXIF you will see that the resolution of the K110D image is
72dpi whereas the K5 image is 300dpi.
The original K110D file is 4.64Mp & the K5 5.72Mp
Visually I can't see any difference. Both original files start to become
pixellated at about 150% zoom.
I think we need some expert comment here.
Alan C
BTW, don't you think that old K110D still does a good job?
On 06-Jul-18 06:51 AM, Alan C wrote:
I remember setting my K7 to 6Mp to compare with my K110D (max 6.1Mp). I could see no
difference but the K7 files were considerably larger than the K110D files. I'll repeat the
exercise later today with the K110D & the K5 (sold the K7) & post the images &
stats.
Alan C
On 05-Jul-18 11:22 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
are the photos from a 16Mp DSLR set to the 6 Mp setting sharper
than a 6 Mp DSLR running at full resolution? My hunch is they would be but
has anyone ever tried this or a similar comparison?
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
