Re: smaller resolution vs native formats (Test Results)
Ja, you're right. I'll have to do it again. Alan C On 08-Jul-18 03:02 AM, Rick Womer wrote: Methinks that unless you compare RAW files, you’re not comparing sensors, only processing. Rick On Jul 6, 2018, at 4:13 AM, Alan C wrote: OK. Here they are: https://www.flickr.com/photos/wisselstroom/43181328112/ K5 shown - scroll for K110D Both 6Mp 3star JPEG's. Both taken with the HD 55 - 300mm @ 300mm f8 AV Range of subject about 40m. Mininimal post processing, images uncropped, not sharpened If you look at the EXIF you will see that the resolution of the K110D image is 72dpi whereas the K5 image is 300dpi. The original K110D file is 4.64Mp & the K5 5.72Mp Visually I can't see any difference. Both original files start to become pixellated at about 150% zoom. I think we need some expert comment here. Alan C BTW, don't you think that old K110D still does a good job? On 06-Jul-18 06:51 AM, Alan C wrote: I remember setting my K7 to 6Mp to compare with my K110D (max 6.1Mp). I could see no difference but the K7 files were considerably larger than the K110D files. I'll repeat the exercise later today with the K110D & the K5 (sold the K7) & post the images & stats. Alan C On 05-Jul-18 11:22 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote: are the photos from a 16Mp DSLR set to the 6 Mp setting sharper than a 6 Mp DSLR running at full resolution? My hunch is they would be but has anyone ever tried this or a similar comparison? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: smaller resolution vs native formats (Test Results)
Methinks that unless you compare RAW files, you’re not comparing sensors, only processing. Rick > On Jul 6, 2018, at 4:13 AM, Alan C wrote: > > OK. Here they are: > > https://www.flickr.com/photos/wisselstroom/43181328112/ > > K5 shown - scroll for K110D Both 6Mp 3star JPEG's. > > Both taken with the HD 55 - 300mm @ 300mm f8 AV Range of subject about > 40m. Mininimal post processing, images uncropped, not sharpened > > If you look at the EXIF you will see that the resolution of the K110D image > is 72dpi whereas the K5 image is 300dpi. > > The original K110D file is 4.64Mp & the K5 5.72Mp > > Visually I can't see any difference. Both original files start to become > pixellated at about 150% zoom. > > I think we need some expert comment here. > > Alan C > > BTW, don't you think that old K110D still does a good job? > > > On 06-Jul-18 06:51 AM, Alan C wrote: >> I remember setting my K7 to 6Mp to compare with my K110D (max 6.1Mp). I >> could see no difference but the K7 files were considerably larger than the >> K110D files. I'll repeat the exercise later today with the K110D & the K5 >> (sold the K7) & post the images & stats. >> >> Alan C >> >> >> On 05-Jul-18 11:22 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote: >>> are the photos from a 16Mp DSLR set to the 6 Mp setting sharper >>> than a 6 Mp DSLR running at full resolution? My hunch is they would be but >>> has anyone ever tried this or a similar comparison? >>> >> >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus >> >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: smaller resolution vs native formats (Test Results)
OK. Here they are: https://www.flickr.com/photos/wisselstroom/43181328112/ K5 shown - scroll for K110D Both 6Mp 3star JPEG's. Both taken with the HD 55 - 300mm @ 300mm f8 AV Range of subject about 40m. Mininimal post processing, images uncropped, not sharpened If you look at the EXIF you will see that the resolution of the K110D image is 72dpi whereas the K5 image is 300dpi. The original K110D file is 4.64Mp & the K5 5.72Mp Visually I can't see any difference. Both original files start to become pixellated at about 150% zoom. I think we need some expert comment here. Alan C BTW, don't you think that old K110D still does a good job? On 06-Jul-18 06:51 AM, Alan C wrote: I remember setting my K7 to 6Mp to compare with my K110D (max 6.1Mp). I could see no difference but the K7 files were considerably larger than the K110D files. I'll repeat the exercise later today with the K110D & the K5 (sold the K7) & post the images & stats. Alan C On 05-Jul-18 11:22 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote: are the photos from a 16Mp DSLR set to the 6 Mp setting sharper than a 6 Mp DSLR running at full resolution? My hunch is they would be but has anyone ever tried this or a similar comparison? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
