Re: [Pdns-users] Pdns Remote vs Pipe backend performance

2013-03-07 Thread Peter van Dijk
Hello, On Mar 6, 2013, at 15:01 , Aleksey Chudov wrote: Unfortunately In the current implementation PowerDNS Pipe can not pass parameters to the application. So I had to change coprocess.cc code to connect from PowerDNS Pipe and Remote Pipe to the unix socket using socat binary. Just

Re: [Pdns-users] Pdns Remote vs Pipe backend performance

2013-03-07 Thread bert hubert
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 06:05:39PM +0200, Aleksey Chudov wrote: There is several problems if launch JVM directly from PowerDNS Indeed, these are all very convincing. In revision 3111 you'll find a version of PowerDNS that can connect to a UNIX socket if you feed one as the pipe-command. It also

[Pdns-users] dyndns webapp

2013-03-07 Thread Mario Caruso
Hello, I'm afraid that this is not 100% in topic, but I'll give it a try and face the consequences, I'm currently administering a pdns with mysql backend and I was asked to setup it in order to receive dynamic dns updates using dyndns2 protocol (so updates should came via authenticated http), so

Re: [Pdns-users] dyndns webapp

2013-03-07 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
mysql backend and I was asked to setup it in order to receive dynamic dns updates using dyndns2 protocol (so updates should came via authenticated http) I'm not aware of anything good, but it's pretty trivial to accomplish, as you probably know: obtain the (authentic) data and INSERT/UPDATE

Re: [Pdns-users] dyndns webapp

2013-03-07 Thread Mario Caruso
Il Thu, 7 Mar 2013 12:42:28 +0100 Jan-Piet Mens jpmens@gmail.com ha scritto: mysql backend and I was asked to setup it in order to receive dynamic dns updates using dyndns2 protocol (so updates should came via authenticated http) I'm not aware of anything good, but it's pretty

Re: [Pdns-users] Problem with how PowerDNS answers when not authoritative.

2013-03-07 Thread Peter van Dijk
Hello Fredrik, On Mar 6, 2013, at 13:48 , Fredrik Dahlberg wrote: I have a situation where PowerDNS Authoritative server answers queries differently from how BIND does it, when it is not authoritative for a zone. PowerDNS (3.2): ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 59699 ;;

Re: [Pdns-users] Pdns Remote vs Pipe backend performance

2013-03-07 Thread Aleksey Chudov
On 07.03.2013 11:16, bert hubert wrote: Revision 3111 can be compiled as tar.gz, rpm or deb from: https://autotest.powerdns.com/ Can you test? I repeated all the tests again with a new revision of PowerDNS 3.2.20130307.3111. All test conditions were the same as described in a previous