Odd - can you paste some 'stats:' lines from the log files?
stats: 4331362754 questions, 1003788 cache entries, 100987 negative entries,
27% cache hits
stats: throttle map: 2752, ns speeds: 76672
stats: outpacket/query ratio 3205%, 2% throttled, 0 no-delegation drops
stats: 263614
Dear PowerDNS community,
PowerDNS Recursor 3.3 Release Candidate 3 is now available! It is in wide
production use already, but we'd like everyone to take a good look at it
before we release it as 3.3-final. If nothing crops up, RC3 will be the
exact same as the 3.3 release.
RC1 had some
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 07:32:51AM +0200, Thomas Mieslinger wrote:
we're using pdns recursor for out company internal name resolution.
We have some strange setups to support that can't easily be removed.
In some of our offical Zones are CNAMEs. The A records to these
Names are in our
Found it solved in http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/changeset/1716
This issue is harmless, but it is good to have it solved for the 'real'
release.
Thanks for the vigilance!
Bert
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 01:39:11PM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 01:37:30PM +0200, Detlef
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 01:37:30PM +0200, Detlef Peeters wrote:
pdns_recursor[32068]: objects-test.deviantart.com.edgesuite.net.:
our root expired, repriming from hints and retrying
pdns_recursor[32068]: s.de.net.: our root expired, repriming from
hints and retrying
Hi Detlef,
Can you list
Dear PowerDNS community,
PowerDNS Recursor 3.3 Release Candidate 2 is now available! It is in wide
production use already, but we'd like everyone to take a good look at it
before we release it as 3.3-final. If nothing crops up, RC2 will be the
exact same as the 3.3 release.
RC1 had some
Dear PowerDNS community,
PowerDNS Recursor 3.3 Release Candidate 1 is now available! It is in wide
production use already, but we'd like everyone to take a good look at it
before we release it as 3.3-final. If nothing crops up, RC1 will be the
exact same as the 3.3 release.
Tar, RPM Deb for 32
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 06:43:08PM +0700, Dmitriy Lyfar wrote:
Hi,
I'm using pdns with my own backend. Previous version I've used was 2.9.21
(from centos repo) and my backend works fine. But we decided to
move to last version (pdns-static, 2.9.22, x86_64) and it can't even run
with my
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:20:07AM +0200, Christian Kuehn wrote:
Hi,
today I installed the Recursor 3.2 in a new Solaris 10 x86 and the
process crashed immediately:
Hi Christian,
Sadly this is well known - see
http://mailman.powerdns.com/pipermail/pdns-users/2010-August/006956.html
save you an
upgrade.
Would this work for you?
Bert.
Sent from my phone.
- Reply message -
From: Simon Bedford sbedf...@plus.net
Date: Mon, Sep 6, 2010 14:16
Subject: tcp listener issue - hopefully fixed
To: bert hubert bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl
Cc: Brad Dameron brad.dame
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 08:31:45PM +0300, George wrote:
I have CentOS 5.5 and powerdns 2.9.21 set up as a slave server. My
problem is that pdns does not reply to queries that come from outside
on any secondary IP . Here's the full story:
Can you run:
grep local-address /etc/powerdns/pdns.conf
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 08:44:01PM +0300, George wrote:
Here are the outputs:
[r...@webprod02 ~]# grep local-address /etc/pdns/pdns.conf
# local-address Local IP addresses to which we bind
local-address=0.0.0.0
(...)
pdns[6269]: It is advised to bind to explicit addresses with the
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 09:17:01PM +, Brad Dameron wrote:
The release process for 3.3 can now start - only 1 feature request left
to
finish.
Good to hear Bert. I'll run it through the ringer on Monday and see if we can
reproduce the problem. Cross fingers that it is fixed.
Brad,
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 12:10:53AM +0300, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Indeed, I have confirmed that pdns does not send a complete set of
records during AXFR, by executing:
# dig example.com AXFR @dns.example.com
where dns.example.com is the pdns/ldap server. The output is exactly
the
Hi,
This message is for everyone using the PowerDNS Recursor with Solaris 10 on
x86 (non-UltraSPARC) hardware.
It turns out that Solaris 10 on x86 has some issues standing in the way of
high performance for the PowerDNS Recursor. With some care, good results can
be achieved however.
If you need
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:37:42AM +0100, Simon Bedford wrote:
Just returned from annual leave to this welcome news, has anyone had
a chance to try it as yet and investigate whether the bug still
manifests? And does it no longer happen when running Brad's test
script?
Simon,
Sadly we found
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 04:56:14PM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
We've fixed yet another bug that might be causing the issue, and we are
currently testing that.
This drop can be found on
http://svn.powerdns.com/snapshots/pdns-recursor-3.3-pre.tar.bz2
Our testing shows that the problem
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 01:20:52PM +0400, Dmitry Rybin wrote:
$ dig +short my.smsfeedback.ru @78.108.89.252
click.smsbliss.ru.
$ dig +short click.smsbliss.ru @ns1.nameself.com
79.125.121.14
All fine, bind resolves this domain, unbound too, but pdns-recursor - not.
It is broken. There are
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 08:55:17AM +0200, Yves Goergen wrote:
On 12.08.2010 08:28 CE(S)T, bert hubert wrote:
If configured with 'master' in the configuration, it will periodically
retrieve a list of all SOA serial numbers, and determine which ones changed.
Does anybody know what time
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 02:24:04PM +0100, Richard Poole wrote:
We're seeing crashes in powerdns 2.9.22 when calling pdns_control
rediscover. We have a cron job that does this, currently twice an hour,
and on average about once a day it results in a crash, looking like this
in
[mailto:pdns-users-boun...@mailman.powerdns.com] On Behalf Of bert hubert
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 9:01 AM
To: Mike
Cc: Brad Dameron; pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] Possible tcp listener issue
The issue has now been reproduced on one of the PowerDNS servers
Briefly diving into this:
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:12:54AM -0400, Dave Sparro wrote:
I see this all the time on BIND resolvers. The keys to the situation are:
* Domain's old NS records have a relatively long TTL (from old auth.
servers)
* Domain owner changes auth. servers with registrar
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:49:19PM -0700, Brandon Lee wrote:
Therefore, we turned on logging by setting the log level to 6 in the
pdns.conf
file and only on the master server we saw hundreds of queries like below
being
logged whereas on the slave server this was not happening. Not sure
, you find
that BIND and PowerDNS resolve about the same amount of domains correctly.
There will be some domains that work well in PowerDNS and not in BIND and
the other way around.
So please ask 'register.it' to solve their nameserver.
Kind regards,
Bert Hubert
PS: in powerdns recursor 3.3
we made at least solves A bug just not your bug.
Sent from my phone.
- Reply message -
From: Simon Bedford sbedf...@plus.net
Date: Tue, Jun 22, 2010 09:44
Subject: [Pdns-users] Possible tcp listener issue
To: bert hubert bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl
Cc: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
From: pdns-users-boun...@mailman.powerdns.com
[pdns-users-boun...@mailman.powerdns.com] On Behalf Of bert hubert
[bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl]
Sent: 23 June 2010 12:47
To: Simon Bedford
Cc: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] Possible tcp listener issue
Simon
Simon,
the solution to your issue is almost certainly in
http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/changeset/1640
Even though you do not see the log messages, I'm pretty sure this is it.
Bert
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Hi everybody,
I'll be part of the 'DNSSEC Workgroup' over at ICANN in Brussels this coming
week. There, I will present 'PowerDNSSEC' plus our vision of DNSSEC on the
resolver side of large ISPs.
More details can be found on http://brussels38.icann.org/node/12491 and you
can even join in
at 04:16:50PM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 03:14:39PM +0100, Simon Bedford wrote:
Bert, its now climbing and not seeming to close any clients on both
servers now, although one is much worse than the other, one is at 11
and the other is at 108 tcp-clients at the moment
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 05:10:11PM -0600, Darren Gamble wrote:
We just wanted to get some information on how the recursor behaves when
presented with a NS record set containing both IPv6 and IPv4 addresses,
and/or if a NS record name has both A and records.
If there a preference by the
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:34:30AM +0200, Uroš Gruber wrote:
Hi,
here is result from one of IP
Try adding -x to the command line. From the 'dig' manpage:
'The default query type is A, unless the -x option is supplied to indicate
a reverse lookup.'
[r...@host1 ~]#dig @91.185.194.202
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:10:29AM +0100, Simon Bedford wrote:
I have been running the 'get tcp-clients' every 5 mins in cron on
both servers, one is very low 10 and fluctuates, the other is just
growing and growing and is currently at 55, hope this info is of
value for debug.
Is there any
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 02:23:04PM +0100, Simon Bedford wrote:
It contains some other exciting stuff too, and it appears to be stable for
production use.
I have now built a static package and installed to 2 of the 8
servers after testing in isolation, they appear to be running fine
and I can
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 04:08:17PM +0100, Simon Bedford wrote:
Simon,
Could you apply this patch:
http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/changeset/1623
And periodically run 'rec_control get tcp-clients' ?
Hi Bert, I have just returned from annual leave and began to look into
this
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 08:32:00AM +0200, Thomas Mieslinger wrote:
when I set the Webseverport to 80 and run powerdns as user a non root user
then the powerdns fails to start with the message permisson denied.
Powerdns seems to drop the root priviledges too early.
Is someone willing to fix
Garry,
2.6.1 WKS WKS records are deprecated in [RFC 1123]. They serve no known
useful function, except internally among LISP machines
Normally we'd whip up an implementation just to have the issue go away, but
it is a pretty weird record type too, containing a bitmap of protocols.
Unknown
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 06:40:18PM +0200, Christof Meerwald wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:12:45 -0500, Naked Short-Selling wrote:
I read your post regarding multithreaded epoll_wait behavior on lkml a
couple of months ago:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/3/441
My understanding is that
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:12:29AM +0100, Simon Bedford wrote:
This has happened a further twice in the last week, output sent off
list, please let me know if you need any further information.
Simon,
Could you apply this patch:
http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/changeset/1623
And periodically
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:29:57AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
% pdns_recursor
% uname -a
NetBSD golgoth 5.0.1 NetBSD 5.0.1 (GENERIC) #0: Thu Oct 1 15:46:16 CEST 2009
steph...@golgoth:/usr/obj/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC i386
Hi
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:18:43AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
It was properly compiled but the Makefile contains a 'strip
$(DESTDIR)/$(SBINDIR)/pdns_recursor' :-( Debugging the non-installed
For installed binaries, this is common.
OK, the ACL parsing is not robust enough. What is
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:01:38AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
[BTW, it would be better to do so on a ticketing system but I cannot
find a way to create a new ticket in the PowerDNS Trac.]
There is some anti-spam trickery:
TO FILE BUGS, OR CHANGE THE WIKI, CLICK 'LOGIN' ABOVE, USERNAME
Derek, Dave, Stephane,
(a rare top-post!), your points are well understood, and will be addressed.
The immediate reason that the pdns-recursor did not have full auto*, and
is unlikely to get it, was the deep dissatisfaction we felt with this suite
of programs.
It turned out to be difficult to
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:15:34PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 07:57:13PM +0200,
bert hubert bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl wrote
a message of 85 lines which said:
The immediate reason that the pdns-recursor did not have full auto*,
and is unlikely to get
answer your question. The main trick is to have enough
queries operating in parallel, which incidentally is a close match to 'real
life' heavy use operation.
The operating system of the numbers above is Ubuntu Karmic Koala.
Let me know if you have further questions.
Kind regards,
Bert Hubert
On Mon
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 03:23:21PM +0800, Lee Standen wrote:
Thanks for that information, Bert.
I had seen the documentation before... perhaps I should provide some more
information.
Here are the options I'm using at the moment (I've tried several values):
Dear PowerDNS people,
The German .de zone currently has an outage on most of its TLD servers. To
keep your customers able to resolve .de domains reliably, you can use the
following configuration setting:
forward-zones=de=87.233.175.25;81.91.161.228
Please remove this setting as soon as the .DE
DENIC reports that the problem has been resolved, please remove the
'forward-zones=de..' statement again.
DENIC has indicated these two servers are not able to serve the whole world.
Kind regards,
Bert Hubert
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 02:51:16PM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
Dear PowerDNS people
contains most of the pdns-recursor sources, it is wrong
to build the recursor from there.
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-recursor-3.2.tar.bz2 this is the
correct place to start. It should compile out of the box.
Kind regards,
Bert Hubert
Operating system:
uname -a
SunOS
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 11:27:13AM +0200, Ton van Rosmalen wrote:
Our primary auth pdns didn't respond to tcp queries anymore where udp
queries still worked. A restart solved the problem.
I didn't think anything of it until I read these new messages on this
thread.
Could it be a shared
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 05:37:10PM +0100, Simon Bedford wrote:
How many TCP/IP queries do you see per second, roughly? A quick run of
rec_control should dig this up.
date;rec_control get tcp-questions
Tue May 4 17:34:22 BST 2010
79371
date;rec_control get tcp-questions
Tue May 4
if you had been running BIND and were seeing
these results. But you are not.
Kind regards,
Bert Hubert
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 11:19:36AM -0400, Barron, Josh wrote:
Hello all,
I've been asked to look into the issues stemming from the changes being
rolled out in a testing form at the root
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 05:04:51PM +0100, Simon Bedford wrote:
We created a patched version in the end and rolled to one server
back on the 8th April, no fault seen since and now rolled to the
entire platform as of today, looking good.
We have now had 2 more failures of the tcp listener on
, the responses it
receive are not altered by the rollout of DNSSEC.
Some other server implementations send out 'DNSSEC OK' questions by default,
and they might be impacted by large packets, fragmentation, EDNS0 blocking
etc. But not PowerDNS.
Kind regards,
Bert Hubert
PowerDNS
PS: we note that PowerDNS
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 01:09:19PM -0600, Brielle Bruns wrote:
Querying from IPv6 host on the same LAN to the server:
www.apple.com
;; Got SERVFAIL reply from 2001:470:e867::3, trying next server
Brielle, have you added ::/0 to the allow-recurse list?
That solves the exact same issue here.
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 12:09:12PM +0200, Detlef Peeters wrote:
Hello,
I've installed yesterday the Update to PowerDNS Recursor 3.2. In the
config I've enabled EDNS with the option disable-edns=no.
Detlef,
You've discovered the (removed) EDNS support from PowerDNS. By mistake,
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 03:09:08PM +0100, Simon Bedford wrote:
A quick update - I've traced down an issue that may have been causing this.
Would you be interested in testing this small patch?
I can help test this patch Bert.
It can be found on:
http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/changeset/1546
or
A quick update - I've traced down an issue that may have been causing this.
Would you be interested in testing this small patch?
Bert
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:58:16PM +0100, Simon Bedford wrote:
We have one of the instances on our non live server happening at the
moment so I have
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 05:54:23PM +0100, Laurent Papier wrote:
I have also upgraded to pdns recursor 3.2 yesterday. And today, I have a
strange
problem on some of my systems. It seems be related to tcp DNS as the only
thing
that stopped working is using tcp dns queries. The rest of the
to PowerDNS, but only to BIND (and probably Unbound).
Kind regards,
Bert Hubert
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 08:13:42AM -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:
Its my understanding that EDNS is going to be required to exchange
keys properly for DNSSEC. Am I wrong? Is EDNS going to be a
requirement
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:43:19AM +, Simon Bedford wrote:
We have been running recursor as a caching name server for a number
of months having moved from unbound, since this time we see good, in
fact quick DNS response time but then when running 3.1.7.1 and .2
and also 3.2.1 we see
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:16:40AM +, Simon Bedford wrote:
Mar 17 11:57:02 [5] bbc.co.uk.: Resolved 'bbc.co.uk.' NS ns1.bbc.co.uk. to:
132.185.132.21
Mar 17 11:57:02 [5] bbc.co.uk.: Trying IP 132.185.132.21:53, asking
'bbc.co.uk.|A'
Mar 17 11:57:04 [5] bbc.co.uk.: timeout resolving
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:06:09PM +0100, Oli Schacher wrote:
Hi list
We upgraded our resolvers to 3.2 (Centos5, 64bit)
After the upgrade, the setting max-negative-ttl=30 does not seem to work
anymore. New records take up several minutes until they show up in the
cache.
Even if we
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 11:35:22PM +0200, Paul Wollner wrote:
I have just upgraded from PowerDNS recursor 3.1.7.2 to 3.2. Unfortunately it
appears the TTLs for records are never decremented.
For the meantime I have reverted to 3.1.7.2. Is anyone else experiencing this
problem?
Try
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:55:16AM +0100, Fabien Seisen wrote:
i have some difficulties to understand what max-cache-entries means.
Fabien,
Which PowerDNS Recursor version did you test against? For a period of 5
minutes, in 3.1.7 you might see far higher numbers. This is addressed in
3.2.
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:04:16AM -0500, Ross Halliday wrote:
We don't have PowerDNS rolled out here yet so I can't speak from
experience, but it makes sense to me that PowerDNS might just
regurgitate the contents of the record for a CNAME whereas everything
else is processed internally,
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 08:43:46AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
You have just given the answer to yourself. :-)
thanks for confirming this! Now, what is the status of the WIP? 5%
done, 99% and quite ready for release, else?
The current status is that PowerDNSSEC 'lite' will be released in very
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 03:29:50PM +, Chris Sarginson wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm trying to use the authoratitive server with a MySQL backend to do
multipart TXT records - on the advice of someone in IRC I just tried
inserting multiple records, however doing this is resulting in the record
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:51:45PM +0100, Udo Rader wrote:
2.1.13.172.in-addr.arpa name = weird.example.com.
exit
hmm, I just tried something else from a remote server that has the
troublesome pdns server as its primary nameserver:
$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 172.13.1.1
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 08:54:23PM +0100, Marcel Pennewiß wrote:
* Domains can now be forwarded with the 'recursion-desired'
bit on or off. Feature suggested by Darren Gamble,
implemented in commit 1451. DOCUMENTATION FORTHCOMING!
Maybe Bert will write a few lines about this feature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everybody,
Please find below the release notes of the PowerDNS Recursor version 3.2,
release candidate 1.
RC1 is already deployed in a number of large places, and it appears to be
holding up well. In addition, a number of future users have
Community to interact, than
for there to be two (which do not mutually communicate).
Kind regards,
Bert Hubert
('ahu' on #powerdns)
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 02:28:53AM +0100, Chris wrote:
Earlier I set this the recursor to some random dns server on the
internet. But there's the problem that pdns should serve some
private zone that's not resolvable through the root servers.
That works pretty well, as long as you don't use
This question keeps getting asked, I've put a note about this in the
documentation, http://doc.powerdns.com/backends-detail.html#AEN5622
For completeness:
Besides regular query types, the DNS also knows the 'ANY' query type. When
a server receives a question for this ANY type, it should reply
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 08:07:23AM +0100, ab...@t-ipnet.net wrote:
mydomain.net=172.17.18.241;172.17.18.242
maybe you have different zone data on your auth servers. What is the
result of
# dig @172.17.18.241 smtp.mydomain.net.
and
# dig @172.17.18.242 smtp.mydomain.net.
In
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 10:20:44AM +, Chris Maciejewski wrote:
Hi,
Just wanted to let you know I recently released a new PowerDNS GUI.
It is a GPL v2. licensed and hosted at http://code.google.com/p/pdns-gui/
What can I say except: LOOKING GOOD!
I see there is a demo on
Hi everybody,
I promised several people to summarise what we discovered about the spike of
packets. It is not quite conclusive, but enough that we know what to do.
The short summary is that the upcoming 3.2 release will contain some slight
tweaks to improve stability, but that there is no reason
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 03:35:59PM +0100, Michael FROMENT wrote:
I've test DNS packet size with my pdns-resursor and it seems that I cannot
get packet size over 512bytes.
(...)
The PowerDNS Recursor can do 512 packets over TCP/IP fine. Outside of
DNSSEC, 512 byte packets are exceedingly rare.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 01:15:04PM +0100, Sean Boran wrote:
The PDNS tarball on :
http://www.powerdns.com/en/downloads.aspx
is still the same version, 2.9.22, which is the version that was around a
year ago.
Sean,
That is the version number for the Authoritative Server - for the Recursor
it
Hi Pizza,
I briefly thought you were Anthony Mangieri ;-) But he has better things to
do than manage DNS.
Can you show an AXFR of your foobar.com domain? I'm not too aware of the
exact workings of the LDAP backend, so I need to see if your problem is
simply DNS related.
Thanks.
Bert
their older versions too once we get round to shipping the
patch to 3.1.4.
Many thanks to Imre Gergely, who mangled the patches for Ubuntu.
Bert
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 04:19:56PM +0100, bert hubert wrote:
The correct links to the .deb packages are:
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/deb
us.
Kind regards,
Bert Hubert
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
/pdns_recursor.
Bert
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 04:11:09PM +0100, bert hubert wrote:
Dear PowerDNS Users,
Two major vulnerabilities have recently been discovered in the PowerDNS
Recursor (all versions up to and including 3.1.7.1). Over the past two
weeks, these vulnerabilities have been
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:07:18AM +, Josh Berry wrote:
I am having a problem with the powerdns recursor where the TCP listener
dies every now and then unless the daemon is restarted periodically.
Josh,
Can you tell us if you are behind a firewall? Perhaps iptables on the host
itself?
Are
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:30:25AM +, Josh Berry wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:07:18AM +, Josh Berry wrote:
Can you tell us if you are behind a firewall? Perhaps iptables on the host
itself?
The server is not behind a firewall, it is behind a load balancer (Nortel
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 09:14:28PM +0100, Gerhard Gaußling wrote:
I'm using powerdns since a long time on ubuntu/hardy amd64.
My ISP changed his behaviour and now I get on NXDOMAIN an ad site with a
search form. But I prefer to get the firefox error page.
I can understand.
How do I
Hi everybody,
Over the past few months, the PowerDNS Wiki and Subversion servers had a
hard time and were no longer able to keep up with the growing amounts of
traffic. Since these servers also routed my personal email, I had little
choice but move the flood of spam to gmail. But no more!
We
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 06:54:55PM -0800, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
After resetting my working copy and running bootstrap and
CXXFLAGS=-I/opt/local/include/ ./configure --with-modules=pipe
The current subversion trunk may indeed have problems compiling the
Authoritative Server.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Barron, Josh jbar...@afsnetworks.com wrote:
Ok looks like PDNS-Recursor compiled.
I've attached the errors I received during the compilation. FYI I'm using
the following platform:
SunOS ns1 5.10 Generic_141444-09 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T1000
Now on to
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Barron, Josh jbar...@afsnetworks.com wrote:
Has anyone gotten the latest version of PDNS to install on Solaris 10
Sparc??
Lots of random posts out there but nothing much definitive…
Josh,
Can you try
Robert,
The suggestion is to not compile the recursor from the authoritative
tarball - this is not supported!
So remove --enable-recursor, and things should be fine.
Good luck!
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Robert Dunkley rob...@saq.co.uk wrote:
Can anyone offer any advice on this? Have
Hi everybody!
Sorry for being a bit silent over the past two weeks, have been very busy
with our newly born son Guus! Mother and son are doing really well.
In the meantime, you may enjoy the propaganda below from DNS vendor Nominum,
who I know are stalking many subscribers of this list to
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Fagyal Csongor
conc...@conceptonline.hu wrote:
The question is: if I know I have wildcard records, then I have to do a
wildcard query? Currently what I do is to first query non-wildcard records,
and if none is found, then I do a wildcard match. Is that correct?
if you want to attend.
I wish his family and everyone who knew Jorn lots of strength in dealing
with this tremendous loss.
Bert Hubert
PowerDNS.COM
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns
Hi everybody,
The presentation from last Friday can be found on
http://tinydns.com/powerdns DNS Security in the Broadest Sense.
In addition, a movie of the presentation, two interviews (radio video) and
some nice photos can be found on:
This should of course read: http://tinyurl.com/powerdns
Apologies for the confusion!
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 03:55:56PM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
The presentation from last Friday can be found on
http://tinydns.com/powerdns DNS Security in the Broadest Sense.
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com
Dear PowerDNS Users currently at HAR2009,
Besides benefiting from PowerDNS serving the DNS at HAR2009, if you are
interested in PowerDNS, you could consider attending my presentation about
DNS Security in the Broadest Sense tomorrow (Friday) at 14:00 CET.
Also, let me know if you want to meet
to either
acquire a support contract with us, or to fund DNSSEC development directly.
If you are interested, or know someone who might be, please let us know and
we can send you the 'PowerDNS DNSSEC Enhancement Project Proposal', which
includes the budget we are trying to raise.
Kind regards,
Bert
Release notes with clickable links available on:
http://doc.powerdns.com/changelog.html#CHANGELOG-RECURSOR-3-1-7-1
Download from:
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-recursor-3.1.7.1.tar.bz2
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/rpm/pdns-recursor-3.1.7.1-1.x86_64.rpm
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Bryan
Branniganbr...@branniganventures.com wrote:
I would like to configure PowerDNS to log all DNS queries to a text
file or to a MySQL table. Does anyone know if this is possible?
Bryan,
The PowerDNS Authoritative Server does not have this ability, the
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Brendan Oakleygent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Bryan Brannigan wrote:
I would like to configure PowerDNS to log all DNS queries to a text
file or to a MySQL table. Does anyone know if this is possible?
There is the query-logging
501 - 600 of 844 matches
Mail list logo
